Galaxy battle: I walked 5,500 steps with the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 vs Galaxy Watch 7 — here's the winner

Close-up of a user's wrist wearing the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic (left) and Galaxy Watch 7 (right)
(Image credit: Dan Bracaglia/Tom's Guide)

Samsung makes some of the best smartwatch models available in 2025, including both the Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 and the newer Samsung Galaxy Watch 8.

I've already covered the differences between the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 vs. the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 in terms of features, design, and battery life, but what about fitness-tracking accuracy?

To find out which Samsung smartwatch is the more precise workout companion, I sported one on either wrist and embarked on a 5,500-step walk — manually counted, of course — around my neighborhood in Seattle, Washington.

Scroll down the page to see how my post-workout stats compare, including steps, distance, climb, pace, heart rate, and calories burned.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 vs. Galaxy Watch 7: Quick comparison

Close-up of the Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 and Galaxy Watch 8 Classic in a user's hand showing the app screens

(Image credit: Dan Bracaglia/Tom's Guide)

But first, a quick comparison: The Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 and Galaxy Watch 8 feature the same onboard health sensor array, but the newer model has a couple of exclusive wellness features, including insights into a user's cardiovascular load and antioxidant levels.

The Galaxy Watch 8 also has a brighter screen and slightly better battery life. Design-wise, the older model sports a simple, circular case, while the Galaxy Watch 8 has a 'cushion case' similar to the Galaxy Watch Ultra.

Another major distinction: Only the Galaxy Watch 8 is available in Samsung's 'Classic' edition, which features a fan-favorite rotating bezel.

Those core differences aside, from a fitness-tracking perspective, these two devices are essentially an even match. So, which model, the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 or Galaxy Watch 7, came out on top in my walk test? Read on to find out.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic
Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic: $499 at Samsung

The latest Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 comes in three varieties, including my favorite, the 'Classic' edition. This version spots an extra, programmable 'Action' button and a fan-fav rotating bezel. It's also the longest-lasting Galaxy Watch 8 option, cruising for ~42 hours per charge in my testing.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 7
Samsung Galaxy Watch 7: was $299 now $239 at Amazon

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 is last year's model, but it offers most of the same features, including best-in-class sleep tracking, as the newer Galaxy Watch 8, just at a lower price point and in an arguably sleeker package. The tradeoff is reduced battery life and a less bright display.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 vs. Galaxy Watch 7: Walk test results

For this walk test, I wore the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic on my left wrist and the Galaxy Watch 7 (40mm) on my right wrist. As a control, I manually counted my steps, denoting every hundred taken with a click of my trusty tally counter. As a control for distance, elevation, and pace data, I ran Strava on my iPhone.

To avoid either device piggybacking on location data from my paired Samsung Galaxy S24, I left it behind.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 vs. Galaxy Watch 7 walk test results
Header Cell - Column 0

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic

Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 (40mm)

Control

Step count

5,531 steps

5,475 steps

5,500 steps (manual count)

Distance

3.08 miles

3.20 miles

3.16 miles (Strava)

Elevation gain

221 feet

211 feet

237 feet

Average pace

16 mins 22 secs per mile

16 mins 12 secs per mile

16 mins 19 secs per mile

Average heart rate

130 bpm

131 bpm

n/a

Max heart rate

160 bpm

161 bpm

n/a

Total calories burned

352 calories

328 calories

n/a

Device battery usage

8%

12%

n/a

This is as close as they come. Both the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 and Galaxy Watch 7 recorded step count tallies that fall well within a reasonable margin for error. The former overcounted by just 31 steps and the latter undercounted by a mere 25 steps.

Strava, for what it's worth, measured a step count total of 5,524 steps.

Distance-wise, both smartwatches also proved accurate, with less than a tenth of a mile separating the totals from Strava's count.

The Galaxy Watch 8 seems to have undecounted my climb by a manageable 16 feet, while the Galaxy Watch 7 was off by a more notable 26 feet. Beyond that, pace, heart rate, and calorie data are all anear-match across the board.

Finally, the Galaxy Watch 7 burned more battery during my 50-minute walk, which was to be expected.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 vs. Galaxy Watch 7: And the winner is...

Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 in 40mm on a user's wrist

(Image credit: Tom's Guide)

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 is just as competent at tracking workouts as the newer Galaxy Watch 8.

While the Galaxy Watch 7 was ever-so-slightly more accurate at counting my steps and measuring my distance, the Galaxy Watch 8 was noticeably more precise at measuring my climb.

So, which device wins this bout? I'm giving the championship belt to the Galaxy Watch 7, but I strongly suspect that these two titans of the wrist will be squaring up again sometime soon (perhaps for a bike ride). As noted above, this was an exceptional close comparison.

More importantly, you now know that the Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 is just as competent at tracking workouts as the newer Galaxy Watch 8, and either is a great choice to keep tabs on your next walk, run, hike, or pickleball match.

More from Tom's Guide

Dan Bracaglia
Senior Writer, Fitness & Wearables

Dan Bracaglia is the Tom’s Guide editorial lead for all things smartwatches, fitness trackers and outdoor gear. With 15 years of experience as a consumer technology journalist testing everything from Oura Rings to instant cameras, Dan is deeply passionate about helping readers save money and make informed purchasing decisions. In the past year alone, Dan has assessed major product releases from the likes of Apple, Garmin, Google, Samsung, Polar and many others. 

An avid outdoor adventurer, Dan is based in the U.S. Pacific Northwest where he takes advantage of the beautiful surroundings every chance he gets. A lover of kayaking, hiking, swimming, biking, snowboarding and exploring, he also makes every effort to combine his day job with his passions. When not assessing the sleep tracking and heart rate accuracy of the latest tach gadgets, you can find him photographing Seattle’s vibrant underground music community.

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.