Best Basic PC Antivirus Software

Phishing scams, ransomware, malvertising and run-of-the-mill malware lurk everywhere on the internet. So which antivirus program should you get if you need to safeguard a Windows system without spending a lot?

Based on our tests and research, among the eight inexpensive Windows antivirus packages we recently reviewed, Bitdefender Antivirus Plus offers the best combination of very good malware protection, a very light system-performance impact and the greatest number of additional defenses and tools.

Kaspersky Anti-Virus was a close runner-up, with excellent malware protection that was offset by a lack of extra tools and features. Norton AntiVirus Basic, Trend Micro Antivirus+ Security and F-Secure Anti-Virus tied for third place. All have excellent or very good malware protection, but take a heavy toll on system performance.

Panda Antivirus Pro and ESET NOD32 Antivirus suffered from middling malware-detection scores, while McAfee Antivirus Plus' decent set of extra tools couldn't make up for its relatively poor malware-detection rate.

All these programs offer essential antivirus protection without many of the side features, such as parental controls or backup software, that are often found in midrange and premium antivirus packages. If you're just looking to protect a PC and don't need many extra bells and whistles, basic antivirus software may be what you need.

How We Tested

Our evaluations are based on three different criteria: malware protection, performance impact and extra features. How good is the program at detecting and removing malware? How much do scans slow down the computer's performance? Does the program have any additional tools, and are they useful? Most antivirus programs have user-friendly interfaces, but we’ll ding one if it’s too hard to find important tools.

All of our tests were performed on the same Asus X555LA laptop running 64-bit Windows 10, with an Intel Core i3 processor, 6GB of RAM and a 500GB hard drive containing 36GB of files. To assess a program's impact on system speed, we used our custom OpenOffice benchmark test, which matches 20,000 names and addresses on a spreadsheet. The longer it took the laptop to finish the test, the heavier the performance impact.

For malware-detection scores, we turned to the most recent available testing results from an independent testing lab, AV-TEST of Germany. AV-TEST regularly subjects the major antivirus brands' flagship products to stress tests involving hundreds of previously unseen pieces of malware and thousands of instances of known malware.

[Editor's Note, Sept. 11, 2017: Best Buy has removed Kaspersky Lab products from its shelves, citing concerns regarding Kaspersky's alleged (but as yet undocumented) ties to the Russian government. However, until we see evidence that Kaspersky software is a threat to consumers, we will continue to recommend it. Here is further clarification of our position.]

Create a new thread in the Antivirus / Security / Privacy forum about this subject
96 comments
Comment from the forums
    Your comment
  • Paul NZ
    No you dont. I've never bothered with using a separate Av or firewall. I'm still here.

    They're all a waste of money. NOD32 is probably the only one worth getting. If I did use t
    -2
  • JazzAzz
    Why isn't ClamAv for Macs mentioned???
    0
  • James_397
    Anonymous said:
    Whether you're running Windows, macOS or Android, you need antivirus software. The question is what you want -- and how much you should pay.

    Best Antivirus Software and Apps 2016 : Read more


    Yet another silly thread. If you have Windows installed, use Defender... period. Stop listening to all the third-party marketing hype. There is no need for anything other than what comes with the OS.
    1
  • Audcurr
    I think customer service should be taken into consideration as well. Bitdefender is the worst, I bought it and the activation key wouldn't work, it took for ever to get it straighten out and they are quite rude.
    0
  • jackj59
    Fwiw, dealing with an issue now, of virus and/or malware, and after running bitdefender and it clearing what it found, I ran malwarebytes and it found over 10 more instances of malware. So though one shouldn't run live more than one at a time, I recommend having malwarebytes and run it periodically, too.
    1
  • jackj59
    Correction: including PUP's - from something called AnonymizerGadget - malwarebytes now found hundreds of more that bitdefender, avast and TrendMicro all missed when using their free online scan. And they aren't simply "potentially" unwanted programs, that AnonymizerGadget is defintely mal/spy/virus ware.
    1
  • Alan_K
    I'm curious about why you didn't test Norton Internet Security. Not that I'm advocating it; indeed I look forward very much to spitting on Symantec's grave some day and only found this article while looking for alternatives. (That was after I found that Norton charged me three times for two subscriptions last year because they set up two automatic deductions on one of the subscription accounts. They then refused to refund the double payment because it was out of the "60 day guarantee period". Burn. In. Hell, Symantec.) However given that Norton would have a not-insignificant market share I would have thought that it would have been one of the ones to test. I would have been curious to see how it performed.
    1
  • Paul NZ
    Yup most of them are a waste of money.

    Doesnt matter what you get. And if you're stupid enough to use programs like Utorrent and get dodgy programs.

    Whats the point in having one anyway. Any AV program doesnt detect everything. And your system will end up infected anyway
    -1
  • Bill_123
    For people who seem to think anti virus programs are waste of time if they go on the internet and they depend on windows to protect them I would say there is a 99.9 percent chance they are already infected with some form of virus or malware. I have found that the better ones are VERY hard to breach and although it is still possible to get a virus the odds are slim to none. Without them your almost guaranteed you will pick something up in short order is just a fact in the modern age. The biggest issues I have is how much do they impact computer performance and how good is their detection. Some are like dropping a boat anchor dragging your computer down some almost unnoticeable. So instead of spreading viruses to all your friends and family get a good virus program and save yourself and everyone you know a lot of grief.
    1
  • espressonator
    Why isn't there a comparison chart? I've used Avast for years; it's free, and it's very good. Why did not Mr. Tom mention Avast as either better or worse than these paid products? My guess is that Mr. Tom is really acting as an advertiser. If he were "non-partisan", then I think he would provide a comparison chart or so to explain why it's worthwhile to pay for products like this instead.
    0
  • Bill_123
    Anonymous said:
    Why isn't there a comparison chart? I've used Avast for years; it's free, and it's very good. Why did not Mr. Tom mention Avast as either better or worse than these paid products? My guess is that Mr. Tom is really acting as an advertiser. If he were "non-partisan", then I think he would provide a comparison chart or so to explain why it's worthwhile to pay for products like this instead.


    You can find dozens if not more reviews on AV programs all of them will vary on who and why they think one is better than another. If you want to believe Avast free is the top choice based on your experience you can find a review to tell you that. Tomsguide is just that a guide based on things they feel are important. Pay programs come with many more features! If you feel you don't need or want these features then without a doubt they are not a good choice for you. What I want and need in a AV is very specific and might not be suitable for you. Same for most people there is no ONE SIZE fits all. It does not make them dishonest or biased just makes them have their own opinion no more or less. I come to this site for their opinion for a good reason I respect there opinions whether I agree with them or not.
    0
  • jraju1954
    Hi, I think that most of the av app for android is always running type taking phone battery resources. Is there a demand type scan antivirus prog for android in free version. Would someone say. i tried avast, it gives protection, but i do not know whether it has a demand type run of program. It does not have a user control install of its acessory software . Anybody knows
    0
  • tizziocaio
    Anonymous said:
    Fwiw, dealing with an issue now, of virus and/or malware, and after running bitdefender and it clearing what it found, I ran malwarebytes and it found over 10 more instances of malware. So though one shouldn't run live more than one at a time, I recommend having malwarebytes and run it periodically, too.


    bitdefender dont like it because forces to make an account and sign in before using it..like "meh rly?"
    Also does way to often background scans and updates like 10 times every day...
    0
  • boma23
    I was running a repair and IT solutions shop a few years back. We regularly installed a free solution on MACs that came in, ahnd a busy week might see 5 - 8 Macs in the shop at once. Sophos free (which is what we used at the time) probably found nasties on around 60% of Macs that came in without protection. Make of that what you will, if you are in the "AV for mac is pointless" camp.
    0
  • Thomas_223
    Sophos auto-update is the worst. Hangs your computer until it completes. No way to stop it or schedule it. Kills productivity until it hopefully finishes or fails and you have to try again.
    0
  • Nickynike
    AVG is a very good freebie. It finds viruses and scans emails. Yet, no mention. Then I scan with Malwarebytes, again free.
    0
  • dusty13
    so microsoft did not pay there way into getting the definitions from the independent security institutes it seems ... because no one heard about av-studios "optimizing" their results in these tests ... ever ...
    0
  • Sue_21
    I have always used trend micro and I noticed they are not there. and it is really getting pricey $268 for virus. so i am looking for one that is not as expensive but as good
    any recommendations please
    0
  • Chris_361
    I agree that Kaspersky is far and away the best and nowadays uses the least resources . I don't know how they did it but it's amazing.
    0
  • Sreekanth_3
    Hi, I installed Norton Mobile AV on my Samsung S6 with Android 6.0.1 , but it's not helping with what I really wanted, which is to prevent my Chrome browser from being occasionally directed to random annoying sites. For example, one which says you have a virus, or one which says you won a prize. They don't do any damage, and I just ignore them and reopen the page I want, but it's the principle of the thing. How do I remove whatever malware is doing this? Thanks
    0