Skip to main content

Symantec Source Code Released Today, Says Hacker

On Friday, hacker Yama Tough, one of the "Anonymous Avengers of Indian Independence Frontier," said on Twitter that the hacktivist group will release on Friday stolen Norton Utilities source code to accompany the current class-action lawsuit filed against Symantec in California.

The news follows a similar threat last week made by the hacker group Lord of Dharmaraja who claimed to have retrieved the source code while raiding servers of the Indian Military Intelligence. The group posted the source code's documents as proof of their bounty, and promised to release the actual data once the download mirrors were established.

"We are working out mirrors as of now since we experience extreme pressure and censorship from US and India government agencies," the group said.

Eventually Symantec confirmed that a segment of Norton's source code used in two of the older enterprise products was retrieved, one of which has been discontinued. However the company's own network wasn't breached in order to gain access to the code, but rather it was grabbed from a third party's server.

"We are still gathering information on the details and are not in a position to provide specifics on the third party involved," Symantec said last week. "Presently, we have no indication that the code disclosure impacts the functionality or security of Symantec’s solutions. Furthermore, there are no indications that customer information has been impacted or exposed at this time."

On Friday company spokesman Cris Paden said Symantec had no additional information, "particularly with regards to any new claims Anonymous is making."

On Tuesday, James Gross, a resident of the state of Washington, filed a class-action lawsuit in District Court in San Jose, California, against Symantec, accusing the security firm of using scareware tactics to sell its products. Scareware is typically malicious software used to scare consumers into buying products by making false claims in pop-up notifications like "you're PC is infected" or "your PC might be running too slow."

According to the lawsuit, Symantec allegedly distributes a trial version of Norton Utilities, PC Tools Registry Mechanic and PC Tools Performance Toolkit that uses a separate software scanner to diagnose the consumer's system. This scanner then reports that harmful errors, privacy errors and other problems exists on the PC even if the machine isn't experiencing those problems.

"The software is falsely informing the consumer that errors are high priority and in addition it is falsely informing the consumer that their overall system health and privacy health is low," said Chandler Givens, an attorney with Edelson McGuire LLP, the firm that filed the suit on behalf of Gross.

The lawsuit later labels Norton Utilities and PC Tools as forms of scareware. As previously mentioned, Norton Utilities is the source code Anonymous threatens to release sometime today.

  • freggo
    "This scanner then reports that harmful errors, privacy errors and other problems exists on the PC even if the machine isn't experiencing those problems."

    If this turns out to be true it should be treated as fraud with criminal charges against those of management responsible. It is totally unacceptable for a 'security' company to behave just like the criminals they claim to protect us from.
    Reply
  • darkchazz
    Awwww YEAH !!
    Hit 'em hard !!
    Reply
  • styrkes
    I'm not sure about Norton and consumer versions (because I don't use them) but I have used Symantec Enterprise Edition ver 11 and 12. They are both very good and has a low cpu usage as an overall antivirus/spyware/firewall protection. I'm just surprised by how much hate there is in the consumer products. Those harmful errors never happened with me.
    Reply
  • kikireeki
    tomorrow's news:
    Symentec Systems is laying off employees , but it's nothing out of the ordinary, claims Symentec.
    Reply
  • kristoffe
    symantec. I wish you well, but your software has 'kinda' sucked for about a decade now. heal well, get stronger.
    Reply
  • EDVINASM
    Tried a variety of antivirus and Internet Security packages. Most would make my PC crawl, especially when daily check is running, just drop your work and run.. NIS and NAV so far are my best investment. Price is very competitive too. Use it on netbook, notebook and PC. All perform reasonably well. As user above mentioned, surprised to see so many people shouting at Symantec.
    Reply
  • freggo
    Back in the days when Peter Norton was turning out the original Norton Utilities his name stood for quality and reliability. Now 'Norton' stands simply for bloatware and greed.
    Reply
  • xx_pemdas_xx
    edvinasmTried a variety of antivirus and Internet Security packages. Most would make my PC crawl, especially when daily check is running, just drop your work and run.. NIS and NAV so far are my best investment. Price is very competitive too. Use it on netbook, notebook and PC. All perform reasonably well. As user above mentioned, surprised to see so many people shouting at Symantec.
    The reason it works so good is becuase it fake scans. The proof is in the pudding. run malware anti malware and you will find viruses that NAV missed ( because it does not work) the price is not competative. for free you can have microsoft security essentials with malware anti-malware way better value (free).

    The question is. What other better preforming software are you comparing NAV NIS to? your not. So go test out other programs before you can worship one.

    *side note.* Friends new laptop his dad bought him his dad makes him use norten so he can monitor what his son downloads, I have had to remove several viruses already even though nortan is up to date and siad there where none.


    Me and my friends have had two netbooks (acer aspire one) on with NAV is not able to watch a movie.. The other with AVG is able to watch movies, and play big openGL games. This is due to the fact that NAV processes data slower then other programs.
    Reply
  • NuclearShadow
    freggo"This scanner then reports that harmful errors, privacy errors and other problems exists on the PC even if the machine isn't experiencing those problems."If this turns out to be true it should be treated as fraud with criminal charges against those of management responsible. It is totally unacceptable for a 'security' company to behave just like the criminals they claim to protect us from.
    Should but will not. It is extremely rare when a corporation faces criminal charges.
    Just look at Wal-Mart when they would lock the doors at night and make employees work more than scheduled hours (if I am not mistaken without pay too) locking the employees inside the store. This is a insane a large list of crimes committed and each time for each employee would be a added account. Yet of course no one was sent to jail and in the end the employees won a class action which gave them all a amazing $15 each.

    Remember corporations are people, big people, much too big for petty things like the law.

    Note to self: Trademark that ^^^^^ and when I turn 40 run for president as a Republican.
    Reply
  • captaincharisma
    look out people that means there is a new virus in the wild :)
    Reply