Download the
Tom's Guide App from the AppsStore
News and trends on internet
/ mobile / "sound & picture" / IT
Yes No

Man Who Tweeted Airport Bomb Hoax is Charged

- By - Source : Tom's Guide US

A man who tweeted about blowing up an airport if his flight was delayed has been charged.

In January, Paul Chambers was planning a little holiday to Ireland to escape the bucketloads of snow that had been dumped on England. The week before he was due to fly, he began to worry that his flight would be canceled because of the snow. "Robin Hood airport is closed," he tweeted. "You've got a week and a bit to get your shit together, otherwise I'm blowing the airport sky high!!"

A week later Chambers was brought into the police station under the Terrorism Act and questioned for 7 hours. "I had to explain Twitter to them in its entirety because they'd never heard of it," Chambers told the Independent at the time. "Then they asked all about my home life, and how work was going, and other personal things. The lead investigator kept asking, 'Do you understand why this is happening?' and saying, 'It is the world we live in'."

Chambers was released on bail; and this week police said the 26-year-old man has been charged with sending a menacing message.

The Independent cites a police spokesperson as saying, "A 26-year-old Doncaster man has been charged with sending by a public communications network a message that was grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character contrary to Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003."

A force spokesman said Chambers is set to stand before a court of law today.

Share:
59
Comments
X

Comments

sliem 02/19/2010 5:14 PM
Show
tommysch 02/19/2010 5:14 PM
Hide
-17+

Another case of ignorant pigs trying to impress the public...

Hupiscratch 02/19/2010 5:18 PM
Hide
-9+

Idiot. He's lucky the bomb explosions that happened on London's subway stations are a bit cold now, otherwise police wouldn't treat him so lightly.

touchdowntexas13 02/19/2010 5:18 PM
Hide
-9+

What a moron. The police were right. You can't say stuff like that with the world we live in.

Sarcasm + airport = you getting arrested

Not much room for jokes there.

PC_GI 02/19/2010 5:20 PM
Hide
-20+

At least in America we have free speech... as long as you don't say that.. Or anything that another individual might find offensive for any particular reason...

drksilenc 02/19/2010 5:21 PM
Show
divis0nby0 02/19/2010 5:22 PM
Show
insider3 02/19/2010 5:25 PM
Hide
--3+

How did everyone else reading this article catch on to the sarcasm in that tweet except the police?

logitic 02/19/2010 5:58 PM
Hide
-14+

Bah the Terrorist win every time something stupid like this happens. For the love of God use some common sense next time!

blasterth 02/19/2010 6:00 PM
Hide
-14+

I think divis0nby0 comment is way too menacing, I think he is threatening Paul Chambers life. I suppose police should question him before something happen to Paul Chambers.

officeguy 02/19/2010 6:06 PM
Show
thepetey 02/19/2010 6:32 PM
Hide
-2+

The coutless amount of times I have said "OH how i wish Rogers/______* would just blow up and do us all a favour" on msn/to my friends... I guess I am just lucky they dont monitor or dont act on what is said on those conversations... or I would be in big trouble.. :O

*Insert crappyy Company here

Anonymous 02/19/2010 6:37 PM
Hide
-12+

You're missing the point, the government and the autorities need to keep up the momentum on the 'war on terror', so they can justify taking our rights away 1 by 1.

the_krasno 02/19/2010 6:38 PM
Hide
-7+

Quote :"It is the world we live in"


This world is crap, then.

jerther 02/19/2010 6:39 PM
Hide
-8+

I don't approve but If he were a real terrorist, he would shout threats where it matters, not on twitter... I'm starting to thing that twitter and facebook are being taken too seriously.

the_krasno 02/19/2010 6:40 PM
Hide
-17+

A few years back, the london police gave chase, detained and then shot over a dozen times at a brazilian tourist that they thought looked suspicious.
That is paranoia for you. Still think the cop's actions were justified by "terrorism"?

touchdowntexas13 02/19/2010 6:51 PM
Show
grieve 02/19/2010 6:57 PM
Show
jerther 02/19/2010 7:19 PM
Hide
-14+

grieve :
They guy is a retard....Free speech isn't really free speech, some things you should just never say!


Who decides what can be said? you?

tommysch 02/19/2010 7:40 PM
Show
djackson_dba 02/19/2010 7:46 PM
Hide
--2+

Jerther :
I don't approve but If he were a real terrorist, he would shout threats where it matters, not on twitter... I'm starting to thing that twitter and facebook are being taken too seriously.


I don't know about that. Some dillweed just took out a building with a plane after posting on a blog. I'm not sure I would care what medium is used.

tamalero 02/19/2010 7:57 PM
Hide
-4+

lol, and americans insist "terrorists didnt win!, they didnt changed anything of us".... open your eyes guys, they just transformed your country into the most paranoic country ever.
anyone shouting "it was a bomb man, a bomb of a party.." they would be detained even when they mean it was a cool party?

djackson_dba 02/19/2010 7:58 PM
Hide
-7+

"So what, some IRS dude died."
Nice. That was just some guy working at his desk.
His name was Vernon Hunter and he had a family.
Your liberty ends at the border of actions that threaten the life or liberty of others. Go past this line and you should not have any rights beyond that of a fair trial. Trial finds you innocent, you get your rights back.

On the other side of your argument, liberty and rights are not about numbers. They are about ideals and I agree that the first compromise is simply the segway to others. It should not matter 30,000 or 60,000,000. You either stand by your beliefs or you have no real standards.

djackson_dba 02/19/2010 7:59 PM
Hide
-3+

tamalero :
lol, and americans insist "terrorists didnt win!, they didnt changed anything of us".... open your eyes guys, they just transformed your country into the most paranoic country ever.anyone shouting "it was a bomb man, a bomb of a party.." they would be detained even when they mean it was a cool party?


Big difference between "it was a bomb of a party" and "I'm going to bomb your party."

ik242 02/19/2010 8:19 PM
Show
rsud 02/19/2010 8:26 PM
Hide
-3+

PC_GI :
At least in America we have free speech... as long as you don't say that.. Or anything that another individual might find offensive for any particular reason...



Not true...

You can not yell 'Fire!' in a theater in the USA.
It's illegal and makes sense.
Speach that can panic / endanger the public is not protected.

LORD_ORION 02/19/2010 8:27 PM
Hide
-4+

It's a matter of context...

In the context of his message, it should be quite obvious he was not going to bomb the airport.

Additionally, do terrorists ever indicate their targets before they attack? Seems to be every headline reads either "Such and such claimed responsibility for the attack" or "Nobody has claimed responsibility".

Anyone supporting his arrest is liken to a Nazi.

rsud 02/19/2010 8:32 PM
Hide
-1+

TommySch :
So what, some IRS dude died. I dont think its worth giving away an inch of liberty. The guy is right, this is simply giving in to the terrorist. The best course of action is to ignore the problem altogether, if it gets out of hand, we can always bomb a random country to oblivion.Terrorism is not a real threat, they cannot inflict any damage worth mentioning. Like comparing 9/11 to pearl harbor is blatant ignorance. 9/11 is nothing, 3000 people died (its sad but life goes on), 60 000 000 people died in WW2. The numbers speaks for themselves.




The death toll at pearl harbor was around 3000. How you jump from your pearl harbor "example" to WW2 is some disfunction in your head.

Some IRS dude died? I'm sure he had a name and a family.

Grow up.

djackson_dba 02/19/2010 8:36 PM
Hide
-2+

Some basic thoughts.

First, from personal experience, when someone posts a bomb threat on some anonymous forum for the building you are in your first thoughts are not going to be...
1) Some dude is depriving me of my liberty.
2) I wonder what context that threat was made in. Sarcasm?
3) Can't be serious. It was posted on(insert Facebook, Twitter, etc...).
Unless you are intellectually challenged in some severe way your first thoughts will most likely be "I'm outta here!", "Where are the stairs?", "I can rationalize on this later!" and "I've got one life!".

Second, our rights do have limits in that our rights cannot supercede each other. Your freedom of speech cannot supercede my freedom of speech, personal liberty or my expectation to not live under threat. It is a damned good arrangement. There is no absolute right to free speach. If there were, other people could deprive you of your rights at a whim.

DearSX 02/19/2010 8:38 PM
Hide
-1+

I think most people here are overeating and don't appreciate or understand human rights and lack compassion and integrity. No one has a right to tell another what they can and can't say, imo. I understand retaining someone for crying wolf, but that does not mean I'm right and they are wrong. It means I'm afraid and choose to take anothers freedom for my own selfish life style. I'm willing to live with that, but I also accept that I'm hurting another to get my way.

bamslang 02/19/2010 8:41 PM
Hide
-4+

kingnoobe :
You're all just as stupid as this guy is. You all should be lined up and freaking hung.



Hanged.