Whoop wins injunction to block sale of rival Lexqi band — what does this mean for Polar?
A legal win for Whoop
Here at Tom’s Guide our expert editors are committed to bringing you the best news, reviews and guides to help you stay informed and ahead of the curve!
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Daily (Mon-Sun)
Tom's Guide Daily
Sign up to get the latest updates on all of your favorite content! From cutting-edge tech news and the hottest streaming buzz to unbeatable deals on the best products and in-depth reviews, we’ve got you covered.
Weekly on Thursday
Tom's AI Guide
Be AI savvy with your weekly newsletter summing up all the biggest AI news you need to know. Plus, analysis from our AI editor and tips on how to use the latest AI tools!
Weekly on Friday
Tom's iGuide
Unlock the vast world of Apple news straight to your inbox. With coverage on everything from exciting product launches to essential software updates, this is your go-to source for the latest updates on all the best Apple content.
Weekly on Monday
Tom's Streaming Guide
Our weekly newsletter is expertly crafted to immerse you in the world of streaming. Stay updated on the latest releases and our top recommendations across your favorite streaming platforms.
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
Whoop has scored an early win in its case against Lexqi after a judge granted a preliminary injection to halt sales of the Chinese brand’s screenless fitness tracker in the U.S.
Last year Whoop sued both Lexqi and Polar for ‘copying’ the design of its wearable—allegations that Polar firmly denied when we asked them for comment on the case—and while both cases are ongoing, this injunction seems to strengthen Whoop’s case against Lexqi in particular.
The injunction orders Lexqi to immediately stop selling its device in the U.S. while the litigation continues, and the court found Whoop was likely to be successful in its claim that Lexqi infringed on its trade dress.
What is the Whoop trade dress?
Both the Lexqi and Polar cases hinge on the claim that rival products infringe on the Whoop trade dress, which is the design of the tracker.
Whoop claims certain key design features are part of this trade dress — namely “a continuous fabric band that wraps over the device (i.e. a faceless device) with thin metal accents on the side of the device.”
This trade dress is argued to be aesthetic rather than functional, which is important because if the design choices were functional they wouldn’t be protectable.
Whoop’s argument is the design is distinctive and identifiable as a Whoop brand, so products that infringe on the trade dress could confuse consumers.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Based on this injunction, the court agrees with Whoop on this front with regards to Lexqi’s tracker.
What does this mean for other screenless wearables?
While nothing is yet decided in either of Whoop’s legal cases, this injunction certainly strengthens its claims that similar products infringe upon the Whoop band’s trade dress.
The case against Polar relates to the Polar Loop tracker and is being held in a different court in New York. Whoop has also filed for a preliminary injunction, but the request is still being reviewed.
Should Whoop be successful in both cases it will be significant in how other brands look to enter the screenless wearable market. Garmin is one brand that has long been rumored to be making a screenless tracker, and did launch one of sorts in the Garmin Index Sleep Monitor last year, though this is only designed to track sleep, not daily activity.
If Whoop’s design is determined to be distinctive and protectable, other brands may have to take a very different approach with any wearables in the area.
Follow Tom's Guide on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds.
More from Tom's Guide

Nick Harris-Fry is an experienced health and fitness journalist, writing professionally since 2012. He spent nine years working on the Coach magazine and website before moving to the fitness team at Tom’s Guide in 2024. Nick is a keen runner and also the founder of YouTube channel The Run Testers, which specialises in reviewing running shoes, watches, headphones and other gear.
Nick ran his first marathon in 2016 and became obsessed with the sport. He now has PBs of 2hr 25min for the marathon and 15min 30sec for 5K. Nick is also a qualified Run Leader in the UK.
Nick is an established expert in the fitness area and along with writing for many publications, including Live Science, Expert Reviews, Wareable, Coach and Get Sweat Go, he has been quoted on The Guardian and The Independent.
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.
