I tested the Amazfit Active 3 Premium for a month — and these 3 features beat my Apple Watch

I reviewed the Amazfit Active 3 Premium a couple of weeks ago before, and given it's not left my wrist for a second, this is definitely one of the best fitness trackers. It does everything I want and more: great sleep tracking, accurate activity tracking — all while looking great and lasting up to (and sometimes over) 12 days on one charge!

I also have an Apple Watch SE 3, which is Apple's newest budget fitness tracker. The Apple Watch SE 3 will set you back $249 compared to the Amazfit Active 3 Premium's $169.

You'd think loads of features would've been scrapped to save that extra $70, but you'd be wrong. I think the Amazfit Active 3 Premium actually beats my Apple Watch SE 3 in some key ways — affordability, sleep tracking, and the all-important battery life. Here's why.

Budget fitness trackers in all flavors

1. Amazfit Active 3 Premium is $70 cheaper

Of course, price is the biggest hurdle when choosing new gadgets. Case in point: I've wanted a Kobo e-reader for about five years, but I can't part with my precious $250. If it were $100, I'd probably have bought it ages ago.

Amazfit, however, seems to have mastered premium-on-a-budget. Its gear is gorgeous, functional, and wildly affordable. The Active 3 Premium is just $169 — $70 cheaper than the Apple Watch SE 3's MSRP of $249.

And there really aren't many sacrifices for that saving. Sure, you have to download a separate app, whereas my Apple Watch feeds data into my phone's native Health app. But at the end of the day, the products do the same thing.

The Active 3 Premium doesn't integrate with my iPhone 16 Pro quite as seamlessly — sometimes it takes a moment to sync to the app — but this doesn't affect the overall functionality of the A3P. It's literally a second or two.

2. Amazfit Active 3 Premium sleep tracking is better

This might ruffle some feathers, but I think the Active 3 Premium is a better sleep tracker. Last night (as in, the night before I am writing this), I wore both the A3P and the SE 3. These screenshots are from that night. I remember waking up at around 4 for at least 10 minutes. Take a look to see which tracker picked up on this.

As you can see, it was the Amazfit, not the Apple Watch, that tracked this entire wakeup. I was surprised to see this.

Another major disappointment is the Apple Watch's inability to track sleep HRV continously. Apple will say this is a feature, not a bug — the watch is only intended to capture "windows" of HRV and will extrapolate data from said windows — but the A3P tracks HRV 24/7.

Take a look at the two results below. Remember, this is just from one night, so you won't be able to see historic data.

With the Amazfit, you get a graph of your entire sleep HRV. Please ignore my terrible score — maybe I was subliminally stressed about getting good sleep data last night or something — but you can see from the images how much more detailed the Zepp app is.

For this reason, I'm choosing the A3P when it comes to sleep tracking.

3. Amazfit Active 3 Premium battery life... need I say more?

It goes without saying that Apple really needs to do something about the battery life on its smartwatches and fitness trackers. We've been asking — nay, begging — for improved battery life for years.

The Apple Watch SE 3 taps out at just 18 hours. As I'm writing this, it's exactly 12:00pm midday, and my watch is at 25% — I charged it yesterday evening before bed.

Comparatively, my Amazfit Active 3 Premium lasts a whopping 12 days between charges. According to the Zepp app (Amazfit's health tracking app), I last charged my A3P 7 days ago, and it's still at 53%.

One could argue the discrepancy between battery lives lies in the power usage of each product, but honestly... the A3P does everything the SE 3 does. And more.

The Amazfit takes body temperature, blood oxygen, stress levels, gives you hourly stand reminders, tracks sleep with minute detail, can track for hypopnea, monitors respiratory rate, and even monitors HRV all the time.

As I mentioned in the "sleep tracking" section, the Apple Watch does not monitor HRV continuously. It takes "windows" of data.

I really don't get why the Apple Watch's battery still trails this far behind the budget competition. For these 3 reasons, I think I'm sticking with my Amazfit.

Follow Tom's Guide on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds.

More from Tom's Guide

• Start running for as low as $30 this spring — 19 Adidas running shoe deals with up to 50% off
• Asics just dropped a huge spring sneaker sale — 13 running and walking deals from $59
• This 'gold standard' sleep tracker is the closest I'll ever get to a real sleep study — 3 ways it has already improved my sleep, from sleeping longer to sleeping deeper