If you haven’t heard of Grokipedia, you’re not alone. In fact, it’s not even available yet. The Wikipedia alternative, dreamed up by Elon Musk and developed by his xAI team, was supposed to launch in beta by now. But just days before the expected rollout, Musk slammed the brakes. His reason? The AI-generated platform still contains “too much legacy propaganda,” according to a recent post on X.
That might sound dramatic, but considering that Grokipedia was thought up by the controversial Elon Musk, and the dramatic idea itself is promised to be a real-time, AI-powered encyclopedia meant to rival Wikipedia, only faster, looser and far more opinionated. What could go wrong, right?
Here’s everything we know about Grokipedia, why it’s controversial before it’s even live, and what it could mean for the future of how we find facts online.
What is Grokipedia?
Grokipedia is Elon Musk’s bold attempt to build a “maximum truth-seeking” alternative to Wikipedia. The site is AI-powered and trained on real-time data from X. The purpose of the site is designed to eliminate what Musk calls “propaganda.”
Unlike Wikipedia, which relies on human editors, citations and a global network of contributors, Grokipedia would be written and maintained by Grok — xAI’s conversational chatbot that pulls from a live feed of the internet, including posts from X.
In his post, Musk says the goal is to offer a faster, less censored source of truth; one that reflects what’s really happening rather than what traditional editors or institutions choose to publish.
But that mission is also where the trouble starts. Grok hasn't exactly been the paradigm of truth or moral integerity.
Why was Grokipedia delayed?
Postponing Grokipedia v0.1 launch to end of week. We need to do more work to purge out the propaganda.October 20, 2025
Just days before the planned debut of Grokipedia version 0.1, Musk announced that the launch would be delayed indefinitely. The reason? Too much “propaganda” in the training data.
While he didn’t clarify what content raised red flags, the post suggests a major rework is underway to align Grokipedia with Musk’s vision of “truth”—a vision that often clashes with mainstream moderation standards.
Obviously, this opens the door for bias in the opposite direction, especially since the system lacks Wikipedia’s core safeguards: transparent citations, edit histories and decentralized moderation.
But I think the billion-dollar question here is really, is Grokipedia even possible? Can Elon Musk and his team really build a real-time, AI-updated encyclopedia? Without proper transparency, source validation and accountability, it could also amplify errors or personal bias faster than traditional platforms can correct them.
Plus, Grok has already been flagged for generating inaccurate or politically charged responses. Launching a knowledge platform on top of it only raises the stakes.
Final thoughts
Grokipedia isn’t here yet, but it’s already part of a growing conversation about who controls truth in the age of AI. If it succeeds, it could reshape how we access knowledge. With 45% of AI-generated news aready wrong, Elon Musck could be building more than an encyclopedia but challenging what we see as actually true.
Follow Tom's Guide on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!
More from Tom's Guide
- After major upgrades, I tested Sora 2 vs. Veo 3.1 — and only one nailed my most creative prompts
- Claude Memory just launched and it syncs with ChatGPT — here’s how it works
- Microsoft's Copilot just got a major AI overhaul, looking to compete with ChatGPT Atlas — here's what's new
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.
