Claude Code vs ChatGPT Codex: Which AI coding agent is actually better?

Face Off
By published

I tested two of the top coding agents to determine which one actually thinks like a developer to ship safer code

Amanda's AI Lab
(Image credit: Future)

In the fast-moving world of generative AI, the "chat" interface is being replaced with agents that do so much more than answer questions and summarize documents. Early 2026 has officially ushered in the era of the agentic coder. We are no longer just asking for snippets of code and can now get the full architecture in minutes. Adoption of coding agents is rising quickly, with measurable GitHub usageacross projects.

This week, I put the two reigning titans — Anthropic’s Claude Code and OpenAI’s GPT-5.3 Codex—through a grueling two-part test. First, a "Bug Hunt" designed to reveal hidden security flaws and memory leaks. Second, a "Creative Terminal" challenge where I asked them to build a functional command-line interface for my own sci-fi novel, "Elara: The Vega-9."

The 'Bug Hunt': Finding the invisible

screeneshot

(Image credit: Future)

I gave both models a Node.js script riddled with three "landmines": a classic SQL injection point, a runaway setInterval logic bug and an unbounded global cache (the silent server-killer).

Claude Code felt like a Senior Architect. It went beyond finding bugs to actually teach me how to avoid them. Using a "librarian" analogy to explain SQL injection, Claude prioritized readability and deep architectural reasoning. It was the only model of the two to realize that one of my bugs was so useless it should simply be deleted.

ChatGPT Codex felt like a Lead Developer under a deadline. It was fast, aggressive and highly defensive. It went beyond the prompt to add "Input Validation" (preventing oversized text from crashing the database) — a pro-level move that Claude missed.

Verdict: Keep in mind, no single agent leads across all tasks.. So there isn't a single winner here. Claude Code teaches you how to prevent problems while Codex protects you from the ones you missed. One thinks like an architect — the other ships like an engineer on deadline.

Coding with creativity

screenshot

(Image credit: Future)

For the second test, I pivoted from security to storytelling. I asked for a shipboard terminal for the Vega-9, which is the name of the spaceship in my sci-fi novel. I truly enjoy how easy it is to bring coding into everyday creativity.

Claude's response was a love letter to the sci-fi aesthetic. While the agent itself is a terminal-based tool, the CLI output and code it generated prioritized creative sci-fi touches, delivering ASCII art headers and a 'flickering' CRT screen effect.

Codex excelled at the "lived-in" universe. It added random ship anomalies — like "thermal blooms on Deck 3" because someone left tea unattended. It prioritized the experience of the terminal over the visual "look" of the code.

Verdict: Claude focused on stylistic authenticity, using visual flourishes to capture the retro sci-fi feel. Codex emphasized immersion and systems behavior, layering in environmental details that made the terminal feel operational.

The verdict

vibe coding

(Image credit: Pixabay)

In the current landscape of early 2026, the choice between these two depends entirely on whether you prioritize the philosophy of the code or the fortification of the final product. While both have reached near-human levels of proficiency, their distinct personalities create very different development experiences:

Claude Code is the master architect: It dominates in logic and architectural clarity, using intuitive analogies to explain complex vulnerabilities. I recommend it for developers who want clean code and deep reasoning, as evidenced by its ability to identify unnecessary logic and its flair for visual, in-universe creative styling. I also find it simply easier to use with a better interface without ever leaving Claude.

ChatGPT Codex is the agentic powerhouse: It excels in production-ready speed and defensive programming. Codex looks beyond the prompt to implement "bonus" security guardrails — like input validation and header redaction — making it the more reliable partner for shipping high-velocity code in real time.

The creative edge: Surprisingly, for narrative and UX, the choice is a toss-up. While Claude doesn't have a native visual engine, its CLI output and the code it generates prioritize creative touches. Meanwhile, Codex excels at 'lived-in' world-building details. I'm looking forward to further world-building testing with Codex in the future.

Bottom line

If you're using AI as a creative collaborator, I'd say Claude Code is the superior choice. Its ability to use ASCII art to simulate a visual interface (despite being text only) shows a higher level of cognitive empathy. In addition, when it comes to finding bugs, it feels much more intuitive, making it the better tool for a developer who wants to learn as well as execute.

For those looking to build an actual application, Codex wins hands down. It is the best for developers or those with a solid understanding of coding. In my opinion, it's not as plug-and-play as Claude Code. Codex's agentic capabilities make it a solid choice because of its ability to run long simulations in the background.

Claude Code acts like a senior developer guiding complex decisions, while Codex behaves more like an autonomous engineer executing tasks quickly. It's arguably the powerhouse to beat.

Google News

Follow Tom's Guide on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds.

More from Tom's Guide

TOPICS
Amanda Caswell
Amanda Caswell
AI Editor

Amanda Caswell is an award-winning journalist, bestselling YA author, and one of today’s leading voices in AI and technology. A celebrated contributor to various news outlets, her sharp insights and relatable storytelling have earned her a loyal readership. Amanda’s work has been recognized with prestigious honors, including outstanding contribution to media.

Known for her ability to bring clarity to even the most complex topics, Amanda seamlessly blends innovation and creativity, inspiring readers to embrace the power of AI and emerging technologies. As a certified prompt engineer, she continues to push the boundaries of how humans and AI can work together.

Beyond her journalism career, Amanda is a long-distance runner and mom of three. She lives in New Jersey.

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.