A few missteps leading into a new year.
The immense fiasco that is Netflix's second half of 2011 has finally reached its inevitable outcome: the company predicts that it will fail to turn a profit in 2012. That startling admission was sneaked into the prospectus for the stocks part of Netflix's new stocks and convertible bonds offering, buried at the bottom of the summary statement under an inscrutable layer of obscure business-speak:
"Consistent with our Q4 guidance, our domestic streaming and DVD gross cancellations continued to steadily decline in October and the first half of November, while gross additions of new streaming subscribers remained strong," the concluding paragraph reads. "As a result, consistent with our prior guidance, we continue to expect our domestic streaming net additions to be about flat for November as a whole and strongly positive for December. We expect that consolidated quarterly revenue will be relatively flat until we can achieve positive net subscriber additions. As a result of the relatively flat consolidated revenues and previously announced increased investment in our International segment, we expect to incur consolidated net losses for the year ending December 31, 2012."
This is part of a larger bleak portrait painted by the prospectus, which outright states that investment in Netflix offers a high degree of risk. "We cannot assure you that our domestic streaming cancellations will continue to decline or that gross new additions will remain strong. If we are unable to repair the damage to our brand and reverse negative subscriber growth, our business, results of operations, including cash flows, and financial condition will continue to be adversely affected."
Simply put, after a period of crisis that began with an unpopular price hike and continued with a terrible-sounding (and quickly abandoned) rebranding, the streaming and DVD rental service continues to bleed customers, and there is no guarantee the problem isn't fatal. Though the company's stock price once peaked at $300.00, it now sits around $75.00.
Netflix is pinning hopes for future success on original content, beginning with a deal that will bring the classic cult TV series Arrested Development back for a fourth season in 2012. The stocks and convertible bonds offering is intended to raise $400 million in funding for such endeavors. Though there's no way to assure wary customers that other original content will be as good as Arrested Development, at least those productions will make up for the noticeable decline in the Netflix streaming library that now forces even fans of shows like Babylon 5 to watch on DVD. Just as long as the block of original programming shows isn't given some ridiculous name, like TVster.
I've got a solution for you. Learn to run a business.
Netflix didn't increase prices for the lulz, they increased them because their costs went up. Netflix initially licensed streaming content when networks thought it was worthless and took whatever they could get on it. The licenses expired and they had to renegotiate them, obviously for more because the license is worth more.
I've got a solution for you. Learn to run a business.
Netflix didn't increase prices for the lulz, they increased them because their costs went up. Netflix initially licensed streaming content when networks thought it was worthless and took whatever they could get on it. The licenses expired and they had to renegotiate them, obviously for more because the license is worth more.
Considering the limited selection for streaming, and the extended wait time on new releases. The current price point for either service on it's own is excessive. Honestly, Netflix cost me more per year than renting from Blockbuster does.
They deserve to fail not because they tried to raise prices but because the entire thing was done in such a poor way that you can't help but piss people off. Whatever person's idea it was to implement these things in the fashion that they did should get out of business and stay out of it because they have no clue and will probably cripple the next company they go to work for as well.
As a side note the content of their streaming service was always pretty lackluster. Most of the content was either old movies or B-rated and TV shows. Most of the good content they had was from STARZ, now that they jumped ship and signed on with Blockbuster most of what is left is trash and not even worth paying for. The DVD/Blueray service was the only part that actually had a good selection of newer movies and even that you had to wait a month to watch new releases after everyone else had them. Those things were acceptable at the old price, but under the new structure it is hard to justify, especially now that STARZ content is history.
You shouldn't be so quick to shove Netflix under the bus though. None of their competing services would be around were it not for them. Blockbuster would still be charging you more than the price of a new DVD for a late fee and no one would be questioning why they pay so much and watch so little on cable. There's stormy seas ahead for them between renegotiating contracts with studios that are becoming hostile to the devaluing of their content and ISPs becoming hostile over the bandwidth being used by the service.
Maybe we'll get a better broadband infrastructure out of it...
nah...
The new generation doesn't have a TV and doesn't want to pay $100/mo for crappy cable. We want instant access to whatever we want (within reason). If Netflix goes down, megavideo will prosper.
Blame property values increasing.
Netflix is great. If you can't afford it, go back to watching PBS with your CRT bunny-ear TV from 1987.