Interest in EV trucks like F150 Lightning is plummeting — here's why

Ford F150 Lightning test drive for a weekend.
(Image credit: Future)

I never once imagined ever being enticed by a pickup truck, but that all changed when I test drove the Ford F150 Lightning over a weekend. Just in that time alone, I was convinced about many things regarding electric vehicles, even though I had challenges filling up at a Tesla Supercharger station. Yet, it looks like I’m in the minority because the latest reports indicate that demand for electric trucks like the F150 Lightning have waned.

On one hand, I’m not terribly surprised by this, but Ford took this gamble with its most popular pickup truck model. It was just days ago when Ford announced layoffs for 1,400 of its workers in its factory in Michigan that manufactures the F150 Lightning, which only compounds the year-over-year decrease in sales posted for Q4 2023.

Not only have sales been softer than expected, but it appears as though inventory is also beginning to pile up at Ford dealerships — again, an indication of how interest is plummeting around EV trucks. Even Tesla is not immune to the downturn, with the company reporting the first Tesla delivery decline in nearly four years. So what's going on?

Just downright expensive

Ford F150 Lightning charging at Tesla station

(Image credit: Future)

One of the biggest reasons for the slowed interest is because EV trucks are obnoxiously expensive, including the base model of the Ford F150 Lightning. That one starts at $49,995, while a top-of-the-line F150 Lightning Platinum will set you back $92,000 at the very least. If you think that’s outrageous, there’s also the F150 Platinum Black Edition that’s being offered in a limited batch of 2,000 models for $97,000 starting.

It’s not just a Ford problem either, as other EV pickup trucks are priced just as much — including the Rivian R1T that starts at $69,900 and Tesla’s Cybertruck at $57,390. Those prices are for their respective base models, with top-of-the-line models getting close to that six figure mark.

Car shopping site Edmunds released a study that found the desired price range for an EV is $30,000 to $40,000 with those surveyed. This range isn’t all that impractical, given how there are more all-electric sedans and small SUVs in this range than ever before. Take the Tesla Model 3 and Model Y, which both start under $40,000 after rebates.

To be fair, though, Tesla has cut prices and the company's deliveries have still declined by 8.5% during the first quarter. The company says this is partly due to preparing one of its factories to handle an updated Model 3 and shutdowns at its Berlin plant. But there still seems to be softer demand and also increased competition from Chinese automakers like BYD. 

Competition from SUVs and crossovers

Toyota RAV4 Prime being driven outdoors.

(Image credit: Toyota)

At the same time, EV truck demand isn’t as high as it should be because of the competition from smaller SUVs and crossovers. Edmunds’ study found that 10% of those surveyed were interested in an electric pickup truck, while SUVS and crossovers ranked higher with 43% and 42%, respectively.

It also helps when many of these SUVs and crossovers have tens of thousands in savings over an EV pickup truck like the Ford F150 Lightning. In exploring EVs more, I’ve rediscovered another type of vehicle that could be taking away interest from pricey EV trucks. During the New York Auto Show 2024, I was pleasantly surprised by the Toyota RAV4 Prime — a plug-in hybrid SUV that looks and functions like its gas-powered sibling, but has an all-electric engine that’s good for up to 42 miles of range.

Consumers who are apprehensive about committing to a fully electric vehicle could be swayed by plug-in hybrids like the RAV4 Prime, mainly because they don’t have the same constraints of ‘filling up’ on long road trips. At the same time, they can experience the savings of all-electric power — despite having much less range. For drivers expecting to use it on short trips and commutes, these plug-in hybrids have value. To its credit, Ford does offer a plug-in hybrid in the Ford Escape.

Ford should’ve started small

Ford F150 Lightning test drive for a weekend.

(Image credit: Future)

Pricing has been a roadblock for many potential EV buyers, even though there are generous federal and state rebates that discount them by even more. Instead of Ford going big and gambling on an F150 Lightning, I think it should’ve gone after a smaller pickup truck that inherently would’ve been cheaper as well.

The Ford Maverick was the only truck that had positive sales during Q4 2023, a 22% increase that totaled 22,628 units sold. Given the consumer interest in smaller SUVs and crossovers, Ford could’ve drawn wider appeal by making an all-electric version of the Maverick. The base version starts at around $24,000, which looks much more attractive on paper over the $50,000+ cost of most EV trucks.

Edmunds reports that the average EV sale price came to about $61,700 last year, roughly $14,250 more than the price paid for nonelectric vehicles. Even if an all-electric Maverick came out to around $40,000, that’s still a significant savings over what you’d pay for a Ford F150 Lightning.

I really hope that there’s still time to turn things around because unlike their gas-powered counterparts, all-electric pickups like the F150 Lightning have nearly the same acceleration and range as your average sedan — while offering the utility of its towing capacity and flatbed.

I understand that needs will differ from person to person, but smaller EV trucks could just have enough of an appeal to rival these other all-electric SUVs and crossovers.

More from Tom's Guide

John Velasco
Senior Channel Editor for Phones

John’s a senior editor covering phones for Tom’s Guide. He’s no stranger in this area having covered mobile phones and gadgets since 2008 when he started his career. On top of his editor duties, he’s a seasoned videographer being in front and behind the camera producing YouTube videos. Previously, he held editor roles with PhoneArena, Android Authority, Digital Trends, and SPY. Outside of tech, he enjoys producing mini documentaries and fun social clips for small businesses, enjoying the beach life at the Jersey Shore, and recently becoming a first time homeowner.

  • FrankC76
    They can't tow in any feasible, practical way. It took awhile for this to really sink in because the manufacturers and the media that cover EV kept the fact hidden for as long as they could. Motor trend truck of the year! Okay. Now Motor trend regularly publishes articles about the horrors of towing with it. How did that happen?? EV trucks cannot tow, regardless of their impressive tow ratings. For a wide swath of truck owners, telling us to buy a $70,000 electric truck (or in some cases, $100,000) that will barely make it past your town's city limits (assuming there is no grade) with your travel trailer or boat is a kick in the teeth.
    Reply
  • LRG-DNA
    Towing and distance are two big issues with EV trucks. That's why my latest purchase was a hybrid F150. Good mileage and great towing. I definitely would like to go electric but until we have another battery/ charging breakthrough, I don't see it for large SUVs or trucks, especially if towing is a big consideration.

    I am very interested in the plug in hybrid RamCharger pickup coming out at the end of this year. Fully electric drive train with a V6 under the hood that only serves as a generator. You can get around 140 miles fully electric before it starts using the V6 to charge the battery. This gives you the daily driver benefits of electric while giving you up to 690 miles on a full charge and full tank. This is the middle ground truck I've been waiting for and one that would probably satisfy those wanting electric work trucks. Still possible to use only electric in a workday, but if you have to do a lot of towing or extra long drives, you're still good with the gas motor backup generator. Something I'll likely look at in a few years when I'm ready to possibly trade in the F150.
    Reply
  • curt504
    Other then some Gov mandate for EV, in my view, I've not heard a good answer to; why EV or even plug in for a working truck?

    My digging into the CO2 math finds EV stays net negative throughout its life time, unless very small battery / elec motor in a hybrid. Even on a small battery the CO2 break even is closer to 10yrs out and that assumes the original battery / whole vehical lasts that long. Ok some will break even. But many won't. This whole EV/Co2 thing just doesn't pencil out... ;(

    And I'm an "environmentalist". But I punch a calculator and not listen to Gov mandates. LOL then where is all this new electricity going to come from? Its all mess. Especially where its cold. Just a mess.

    BTW those pictures from Chicago circa last Dec +/- at public charging stations was sad, very sad. I wonder why big and expensive EVs are not selling. Tesla just disappointed with dropping saless, Detroit EVs are tanking.

    I might have mis heard; only 10% of car drivers park their cars in a garage where a charger can be located. LOL thats just 10% of the market that makes sense for full EV... ;( Living in an apartment and charging at public stations is where the brick wall is at practically then the price / mortgage.. Doesn't make sense.
    Reply
  • Maxwell3
    A question for Tom Valasco: In the article, you wrote "demand for electric trucks like the F150 have waned", and, for evidence to back that up, you like to a Business Insider article that includes lots of data about all sorts of things, but not data that demand for electric trucks has waned.
    Then you wrote "Ford announced layoffs for 1,400 of its workers in its factory in Michigan that manufactures the F150 Lightning, which only compounds the year-over-year decrease in sales posted for Q4 2023." To back up your claim of a year-over-year decrease in sales, you link to a Ford Authority article that reports year-over-year changes in sales, but not a decrease. The Ford Authority article reports that sales of the Ford F-150 Lightning rose 73.62% in Q4, and 54.74% YTD. 73.62% up and 54.74% up is not what is called "waning". That is demand waxing.
    To help you read that Ford Authority article, they colored the YOY cells green and added "+". It's hard to imagine someone being confused by the chart.
    My question is, "what is going on?" I see you wrote four articles that day. Were you just tired? Did an oil company PR person send you text? Have you gotten guidance that EV bashing is good clickbait? What's up?
    Reply
  • DrPlanarian
    There is a concerted and VERY widespread and sophisticated PR campaign, probably coordinated by the membership of API and related organizations, to turn the public away from purchasing EVs. You can't swing a dead cat without hitting an article critical of some aspect of EVs, from pointing out that some manufacturers overstate range, or some public charging ports malfunction, or the travails of the poor lithium or cobalt miner, or the horror of range anxiety or battery lifespan and cost of replacement, or how much you'd miss the rumble of a V8 or the visceral thrill of the stick shift, or about Elon Musk's latest outrage, or how unpopular EVs are (so they MUST be bad, right?).

    Many of these arguments particularly appeal to those manly men devoted to their pickup trucks. "Hey, you don't want to be seen driving a GOLF CART around, do you?"

    Now, mind you, the purpose of these articles is to discourage the purchase of truly SUPERIOR products, ones that no longer rely on the oil industry's wares. EVs are faster, cleaner, more reliable and MUCH cheaper to operate than ICE vehicles, provide the convenience of "refueling" in your driveway while you sleep, and allow designers a freedom they could only dream of with ICE vehicles by removing any need to accommodate a big engine, transmission, drive shaft and gas tank.

    The fact is, most of the people who purchase EVs love them and would NEVER go back.
    Reply
  • DrPlanarian
    curt504 said:
    Other then some Gov mandate for EV, in my view, I've not heard a good answer to; why EV or even plug in for a working truck?

    My digging into the CO2 math finds EV stays net negative throughout its life time, unless very small battery / elec motor in a hybrid. Even on a small battery the CO2 break even is closer to 10yrs out and that assumes the original battery / whole vehical lasts that long. Ok some will break even. But many won't. This whole EV/Co2 thing just doesn't pencil out... ;(

    And I'm an "environmentalist". But I punch a calculator and not listen to Gov mandates. LOL then where is all this new electricity going to come from? Its all mess. Especially where its cold. Just a mess.

    BTW those pictures from Chicago circa last Dec +/- at public charging stations was sad, very sad. I wonder why big and expensive EVs are not selling. Tesla just disappointed with dropping saless, Detroit EVs are tanking.

    I might have mis heard; only 10% of car drivers park their cars in a garage where a charger can be located. LOL thats just 10% of the market that makes sense for full EV... ;( Living in an apartment and charging at public stations is where the brick wall is at practically then the price / mortgage.. Doesn't make sense.
    Your "digging" must have been in the wrong spot. There is a HUGE CO2 advantage with EVs. You "break even" on CO2 with an ICE vehicle in the first couple thousand miles.

    Furthermore, depending on where you live, EVs only obtain some percentage, and in some cases that percentage is zero, of their energy from sources that produce CO2 emissions. If your electricity comes from nuclear, hydroelectric or solar, your indirect emission would be zero (your direct emission from an EV is always zero). But even if the energy is from gas-fired generators it is far more carbon-efficient than burning gasoline in your car.

    Sure, extremely cold weather diminishes EV range. But ICE vehicles under the same conditions often will not start at all.

    And a level 2 charger need not be mounted inside a garage. It can be mounted on an outside wall. It's still tough for apartment dwellers, who in most cases will need to rely on public chargers But EVERYONE, irrespective of dwelling, who owns an ICE vehicle needs to go to a public refueling station.
    Reply
  • WHamilton
    admin said:
    Ford recently announced layoffs in its factory that produces the F150 Lighting, which is a sign that interest in EV trucks is starting to lessen. Here's why.

    Interest in EV trucks like F150 Lightning is plummeting — here's why : Read more
    Regardless of how many are sold, any EV is nothing more than a town car. For some, that might be enough. But for vacation travel, the lack of sufficient charging infrastructure to meet demand, charge times that take longer than a sit-down meal, lack of decent range between charges simply rule any EV out for me. I don't care how efficient they are or how much you save on maintenance, they are inconvenient.
    Reply
  • Zmonster
    Where is this $57k cybertruck price coming from. Even on Tesla's site the lowest is $60k. And that won't be available til sometime next year. You can get a base model Lightning or R1T in as little as a week or two.
    Reply
  • john_velasco
    FrankC76 said:
    They can't tow in any feasible, practical way. It took awhile for this to really sink in because the manufacturers and the media that cover EV kept the fact hidden for as long as they could. Motor trend truck of the year! Okay. Now Motor trend regularly publishes articles about the horrors of towing with it. How did that happen?? EV trucks cannot tow, regardless of their impressive tow ratings. For a wide swath of truck owners, telling us to buy a $70,000 electric truck (or in some cases, $100,000) that will barely make it past your town's city limits (assuming there is no grade) with your travel trailer or boat is a kick in the teeth.
    Fair point. It explains why I have only seen one F150 Lightning on the roads by me. But I think it's worth highlighting that the F150 Lightning still has benefits over buying a comparably priced EV sedan or SUV.
    Reply
  • john_velasco
    LRG-DNA said:
    Towing and distance are two big issues with EV trucks. That's why my latest purchase was a hybrid F150. Good mileage and great towing. I definitely would like to go electric but until we have another battery/ charging breakthrough, I don't see it for large SUVs or trucks, especially if towing is a big consideration.

    I am very interested in the plug in hybrid RamCharger pickup coming out at the end of this year. Fully electric drive train with a V6 under the hood that only serves as a generator. You can get around 140 miles fully electric before it starts using the V6 to charge the battery. This gives you the daily driver benefits of electric while giving you up to 690 miles on a full charge and full tank. This is the middle ground truck I've been waiting for and one that would probably satisfy those wanting electric work trucks. Still possible to use only electric in a workday, but if you have to do a lot of towing or extra long drives, you're still good with the gas motor backup generator. Something I'll likely look at in a few years when I'm ready to possibly trade in the F150.
    In another article, I mentioned exactly why plug-in hybrids should be the focus for now because they offer the best of both worlds -- without investing fully into EV.
    Reply