Sony Makes the PlayStation 3 Slim Official, $299

By Marcus Yam, published on August 18, 2009 at 3:01 PM
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: , , , , | Themes: Digital Entertainment
Syndication: Add to your Google homepage Add to My Yahoo!

It's slimmer and cheaper, but no more PS2 compatible.

Earlier today we uncovered pretty good evidence from K-Mart that there would be a new, slimmer PlayStation 3 coming very soon. And now Sony has made it all official.

At Sony's GamesCom media event in Cologne, Germany, all rumors were confirmed as the PS3 Slim was announced to be real.

Sony hasn't yet released official press shots yet (but we'll post those as soon as they're out), but from the slides shown at the conference, many of the leaked shots appear to have been legitimate.

The new PS3 slim measures 33 percent smaller, 36 percent lighter and consumes 34 percent less power. It'll also pack a 120 GB hard drive as a middle ground between the current 80 GB and the 160 GB SKU. The 120 GB size will also put it head-to-head with the Xbox 360 Elite.

Besides the new hardware, perhaps the biggest news is that the PS3 Slim will also bring with it a much slimmer price tag of $299, or 299 Euros, or 29980 yen.

For those of you who've been on the fence about buying a PS3, does this new hardware and price do it for you?

UPDATE: Click here for the official pictures.

Comments | Print | Send to a friend
Slideshows related to this news

Sponsored links

Comments

Gedoe_ 08/18/2009 9:20 PM
Hide
-7+

yes im most interrested in PSN games so this price cut is gonna help for sure, also less heat = less noise so this is definatly an upgrade.

also

FIRST!

aznguy0028 08/18/2009 9:23 PM
Hide
-11+

After many months of Sony saying there was no price cut in sight, finally a breather for PS3 fans.

valcron 08/18/2009 9:25 PM
Hide
--1+

About time they dropped the price. I can honestly tell you while the new price is attractive for once. I will still wait until the PS3 has games worth buying. At the moment the only games on the system that I would buy are ratchet and clank and maybe the Drakes Fortune (forget the name of the series).

Sony has really let me down with RPG's this generation. Thankfully Micrsoft surprised the hell out of me. I will buy a PS3 sooner or later though for Versus XIII if they don't decide to make that 360 as well.

anamaniac 08/18/2009 9:27 PM
Hide
-6+

I'm no longer interested in a PS3 because my i7 is being shiped to my house as I speak...

domenic 08/18/2009 9:27 PM
Hide
-0+

Yes, because that was the number one complaint for the PS3, "It's too damn thick!". I'll definetly get one now that it fits on my shelf.

theholylancer 08/18/2009 9:43 PM
Hide
--1+

goooo 299 good web server or file server with some HDD modding!

tayb 08/18/2009 9:45 PM
Hide
-0+

So how are they going to price the non-slim PS3? What I've read says it will be $299.99. How in the world are they going to clear stock trying to sell it at the same price as the slim? Maybe $250? Only thing I care about is now I'll be able to get one even cheaper off of craigslist.

njalterio 08/18/2009 9:50 PM
Hide
-1+

Previously I was among the most adamant in bashing the PS3 for it costing too much, but at this price I will be rethinking that stance. At $300, it is competitive just as a networked bluray player! Add in the gaming capability and I think this is a good deal.

Being a Final Fantasy fan, I am glad that I can reasonably get a PS3 (which is not coming out for PC, and its looking grim for a future port) for the upcoming FF13. Killzone 2 and MGS4 are also games I would like to play...

However, I will be waiting several months to make sure there are no hardware bugs. As good as a deal I think this is, I do not trust Sony.

gamerk316 08/18/2009 9:52 PM
Hide
--3+

Any word on backward compatability?

bucifer 08/18/2009 9:54 PM
Hide
-7+

Nice conversion rate Sony 299$ does not equal 299euro!

thepetey 08/18/2009 9:55 PM
Show
rooket 08/18/2009 9:55 PM
Hide
-0+

Pretty cool since the original PS3 is a boat. $299 though, that still costs almost 2x as much as an xbox arcade but comes with a hard drive hmm..and with microsoft tax on hard drives I guess maybe it's about the same. Hopefully this will cause microsoft to lower prices on their drives. All their drives are a piece of plastic surrounding a sata 2.5" hard drive, nothing special. I still prefer xbox360 over ps3, I doubt I'll buy one at $299..maybe of it was $199.

mlopinto2k1 08/18/2009 9:57 PM
Hide
-0+

Hmm, anyone ever see people linking these things together to compute on-the-fly ray tracing? Pretty neat. Maybe they can utilize the smaller size and price and hook more up. Look it up on youtube.

Mach5Motorsport 08/18/2009 10:00 PM
Show
thepetey 08/18/2009 10:15 PM
Hide
-1+

lol why am i getting thumbs down ... it clearly says

"It's slimmer and cheaper, but no more PS2 compatible."

thats why that guy is dumb.. for not being able to read the subtitle of the article.. geeez.

insider3 08/18/2009 10:42 PM
Hide
-1+

thepetey :
lol why am i getting thumbs down ... it clearly says "It's slimmer and cheaper, but no more PS2 compatible."thats why that guy is dumb.. for not being able to read the subtitle of the article.. geeez.



Because instead of being an ass and acknowledging that he might have missed that part of the article, you could have helped him out. You just called him a dumbass and we gave you thumbs down.

rooket 08/18/2009 10:43 PM
Show
grieve 08/18/2009 10:44 PM
Hide
-0+

gamerk316 :
Any word on backward compatability?


Slim is not backward compatable... Ill keep my original one. :(

insider3 08/18/2009 10:44 PM
Hide
-0+

I really don't like the design, but it's not about the design right? Saving money on energy is a plus and some of the users can now fit their PS3 in their entertainment system. I don't have that problem plus I don't play mine enough to save energy. But I'm glad that Sony finally surprised everyone with this price cut. That should get a lot of people off of their backs now.

da bahstid 08/18/2009 10:55 PM
Hide
--1+

In and of itself, the price tag is good enough for me, but I really don't want to buy a PS2 separately...ever. Though I appreciate Sony's probably put a lot of effort into making this financially feasible and competitive...personally I'd happily pay $50 more to get BC with the PS3's upscaling as well.

Maybe I can find an old one used that has BC and upscaling for something reasonable by now. I wouldn't care if the HD is only 60GB or whatever it was.

ViPr 08/18/2009 11:03 PM
Hide
--2+

thepetey :
lol are you dumb?!



it's not dumb to ask about PS2 backwards compatibility on the slim even though the article says that the slim doesn't have PS2 backwards compatibility and that is because it might be possible in future to use an all software based emulator to achieve it which could mean that all PS3s, from the past even, will be PS2 backwards compatible.

ravenware 08/18/2009 11:10 PM
Hide
--2+

Damn, they drop the price and now I have other plans for my money :D

taiso 08/18/2009 11:13 PM
Hide
--2+

its not like the recent ps3 models have been backwards compatible with ps2 games anyway! only the first series models were. but thumbs up to sony for actually getting serious in competing with the other consoles from a value point of view...finally

gorehound 08/19/2009 12:08 PM
Hide
--2+

who really cares about the vastly inflated blu-ray when you have the cool cheap DVD upsampled properly.

anonymous x 08/19/2009 12:13 PM
Hide
--1+

gorehound :
who really cares about the vastly inflated blu-ray when you have the cool cheap DVD upsampled properly.


you seriously can't tell the difference? You can't just make pixels out of nothing, that is why blu-ray>dvd, upsampled or not.

bogcotton 08/19/2009 1:27 AM
Hide
-0+

To the guy who mentioned the Euro conversion rate, (I noticed too, except I live in UK so it might be even worse),

299 Euros = 422.76 U.S. dollars.

Why!?

rooket 08/19/2009 1:36 AM
Hide
-0+

299 euros and $299 US? does that mean europeans are getting ripped off? ;) well I hear their games cost a lot more than ours anyhow.

pswenne 08/19/2009 4:59 AM
Hide
-0+

well I guess we canadians are winning here then : 299$ ca is 271$ US so we pretty much pay less for ours :p

goose man 08/19/2009 7:11 AM
Hide
-0+

Actually the Japanese who is being ripped off ?
Why ?

First, 29980 yen = 316 USD. I know $15 doesn't seem much but ...

Second, Let's say that the actual cost plus profit of this thing is N, then N = $299 - X, where X is shipping cost plus imported tax (from Japan to USA)

So they should sell this thing in Japan at N, so they ripped off japanese people as much as $15+X

The value of X for Europeans may be significantly higher than for USA, after all the distance from Japan to Europe is longer than to USA and the imported tax is possibly higher too.

So N+X for Europeans is probably is at 299 Euros (plus minus)

Anonymous 08/19/2009 8:40 AM
Hide
-0+

1€ is not equal with $1. Bloody stupid policy if they keep it in 299€..

bin1127 08/19/2009 9:06 AM
Hide
-0+

K-mart, Good Job!

and +1 for net rumours.


Sponsored links