Product Use case Rating
Kaspersky Total Security Best Premium Antivirus Overall 8
Bitdefender Total Security 2017 Best Premium Antivirus Runner-Up 8
Avast Premier 7
Trend Micro Premium Security 7
AVG Ultimate 6
McAfee LiveSafe 6

Best (Premium) Internet Security Software

It's a cruel world out there, with no shortage of malware, ransomware and phishing attacks to swoop in and steal your data, money and online persona. What is the best way to protect your devices, and your peace of mind?

The answer is to build the tallest and thickest wall around your digital life with a premium antivirus suite. Based on our extensive testing, your best option is Kaspersky Total Security. It not only offers excellent malware detection but also a sandboxed browser for banking and shopping, plus unique webcam protection.

Why Premium Antivirus?

Premium antivirus products cost upward of $100 per year, but offer a world of extra features that low-cost or free antivirus programs don't have. Their product licenses often cover multiple installations on several platforms — including OS X, Android, iOS and, sometimes, Windows Phone — although other platforms' software may be more limited than the Windows version. The most cost-effective premium packages offer all-you-can-scan plans, with unlimited device installations across multiple platforms.

How We Tested

We've done extensive evaluations on six of the latest flagship antivirus suites from Avast, AVG, Bitdefender, Kaspersky Lab, McAfee and Trend Micro. We installed the latest version of each suite on a 2-year-old Dell Inspiron 7537 that had a Core i5 4200 processor, 6GB of RAM and a 700GB hard drive, of which 114GB was filled with an assortment of data and programs. The system ran 64-bit Windows 8.1.

To assess each suite's ability to protect against malware, we used the most recent set of antivirus-software evaluations conducted on Windows 8.1 by Germany's AV-TEST lab. The anti-malware engines were subjected to an onslaught of the world's worst malware in January and February of 2015. We also gauged the program's impact on system performance by comparing three sets of OpenOffice benchmark scores — one before we loaded the program, and the other two while performing a full scan and a quick scan.

In addition to looking at each app's security and privacy features, we dove deeply into their setups, interfaces and ease of use.

Create a new thread in the Antivirus / Security / Privacy forum about this subject
13 comments
    Your comment
  • Paul NZ
    No you dont. I've never bothered with using a separate Av or firewall. I'm still here.

    They're all a waste of money. NOD32 is probably the only one worth getting. If I did use t
    1
  • JazzAzz
    Why isn't ClamAv for Macs mentioned???
    0
  • James_397
    Anonymous said:
    Whether you're running Windows, macOS or Android, you need antivirus software. The question is what you want -- and how much you should pay.

    Best Antivirus Software and Apps 2016 : Read more


    Yet another silly thread. If you have Windows installed, use Defender... period. Stop listening to all the third-party marketing hype. There is no need for anything other than what comes with the OS.
    0
  • Audcurr
    I think customer service should be taken into consideration as well. Bitdefender is the worst, I bought it and the activation key wouldn't work, it took for ever to get it straighten out and they are quite rude.
    0
  • jackj59
    Fwiw, dealing with an issue now, of virus and/or malware, and after running bitdefender and it clearing what it found, I ran malwarebytes and it found over 10 more instances of malware. So though one shouldn't run live more than one at a time, I recommend having malwarebytes and run it periodically, too.
    2
  • jackj59
    Correction: including PUP's - from something called AnonymizerGadget - malwarebytes now found hundreds of more that bitdefender, avast and TrendMicro all missed when using their free online scan. And they aren't simply "potentially" unwanted programs, that AnonymizerGadget is defintely mal/spy/virus ware.
    0
  • Alan_K
    I'm curious about why you didn't test Norton Internet Security. Not that I'm advocating it; indeed I look forward very much to spitting on Symantec's grave some day and only found this article while looking for alternatives. (That was after I found that Norton charged me three times for two subscriptions last year because they set up two automatic deductions on one of the subscription accounts. They then refused to refund the double payment because it was out of the "60 day guarantee period". Burn. In. Hell, Symantec.) However given that Norton would have a not-insignificant market share I would have thought that it would have been one of the ones to test. I would have been curious to see how it performed.
    1
  • Paul NZ
    Yup most of them are a waste of money.

    Doesnt matter what you get. And if you're stupid enough to use programs like Utorrent and get dodgy programs.

    Whats the point in having one anyway. Any AV program doesnt detect everything. And your system will end up infected anyway
    -1
  • Bill_123
    For people who seem to think anti virus programs are waste of time if they go on the internet and they depend on windows to protect them I would say there is a 99.9 percent chance they are already infected with some form of virus or malware. I have found that the better ones are VERY hard to breach and although it is still possible to get a virus the odds are slim to none. Without them your almost guaranteed you will pick something up in short order is just a fact in the modern age. The biggest issues I have is how much do they impact computer performance and how good is their detection. Some are like dropping a boat anchor dragging your computer down some almost unnoticeable. So instead of spreading viruses to all your friends and family get a good virus program and save yourself and everyone you know a lot of grief.
    0
  • espressonator
    Why isn't there a comparison chart? I've used Avast for years; it's free, and it's very good. Why did not Mr. Tom mention Avast as either better or worse than these paid products? My guess is that Mr. Tom is really acting as an advertiser. If he were "non-partisan", then I think he would provide a comparison chart or so to explain why it's worthwhile to pay for products like this instead.
    1
  • Bill_123
    Anonymous said:
    Why isn't there a comparison chart? I've used Avast for years; it's free, and it's very good. Why did not Mr. Tom mention Avast as either better or worse than these paid products? My guess is that Mr. Tom is really acting as an advertiser. If he were "non-partisan", then I think he would provide a comparison chart or so to explain why it's worthwhile to pay for products like this instead.


    You can find dozens if not more reviews on AV programs all of them will vary on who and why they think one is better than another. If you want to believe Avast free is the top choice based on your experience you can find a review to tell you that. Tomsguide is just that a guide based on things they feel are important. Pay programs come with many more features! If you feel you don't need or want these features then without a doubt they are not a good choice for you. What I want and need in a AV is very specific and might not be suitable for you. Same for most people there is no ONE SIZE fits all. It does not make them dishonest or biased just makes them have their own opinion no more or less. I come to this site for their opinion for a good reason I respect there opinions whether I agree with them or not.
    0
  • jraju1954
    Hi, I think that most of the av app for android is always running type taking phone battery resources. Is there a demand type scan antivirus prog for android in free version. Would someone say. i tried avast, it gives protection, but i do not know whether it has a demand type run of program. It does not have a user control install of its acessory software . Anybody knows
    0
  • tizziocaio
    Anonymous said:
    Fwiw, dealing with an issue now, of virus and/or malware, and after running bitdefender and it clearing what it found, I ran malwarebytes and it found over 10 more instances of malware. So though one shouldn't run live more than one at a time, I recommend having malwarebytes and run it periodically, too.


    bitdefender dont like it because forces to make an account and sign in before using it..like "meh rly?"
    Also does way to often background scans and updates like 10 times every day...
    0