Microsoft claims that digitally overlaying maps is owned by the software giant.
Following Motorola's rare German lawsuit victory against software giant Microsoft, the latter company is due to add the former's parent company Google into another lawsuit over Android.
Microsoft stated that Google's Android mobile platform infringes its software patents. However, until now, the firm has thus far pursued handset firms for the payment of royalties as opposed to Google itself.
In a court in Munich, Microsoft said, in what would mark the first time the two technology companies have directly battled in court over Android, Google will be added as a defendant in a case that sees the former saying a mapping feature on Motorola smartphones infringes one of its patents.
"It became necessary to add Google to this particular case because Motorola maintains that it lacks sufficient information about actions occurring on Google's servers," said a Microsoft spokesperson.
The lawsuit claims Motorola infringed on patents that involves Google Maps overlaying multiple map data. For instance, in order to overlay two sets of data, a device will obtain a map from one database, then utilize information such as the location of a business stemming from a second database.

I would wouk 1 year and make ton of publick money...
I would wouk 1 year and make ton of publick money...
Not sure why all the people who criticize Apple are not equally upset with Microsoft, considering Microsoft has taken more money since Android's inception than Apple has.
Dude...if anyone pays royalties to any company, it is NOT because the VIOLATE any patent...royalties is the legal term for LEGALLY licensing the patented tech. So in short, if Google is paying royalties to MS for tech...it is legal and legit, not because Google is violating anything. And MS is not taking money...it is legit. I'm not a huge fan of patent wars, but I'd say MS is usually on the losing side of this crap because they are MS...like when they were court ordered to offer different Internet Browsers because it was some sort of Monopoly to include IE in Windows. Now tell me how is it not a Monopoly for Apple, or Google on their Phones, etc?
Apple and Microsoft are buddies, they have have cross-licensing privledges (Microsoft). MS has pretty much free reign against Apple. This is why Windows Phone has basically nothing to worry about and may end up being the only real competition to Apple soon. Let's just hope MS makes some good products and that Win8 goes away fast and is replaced by Win9...
Ok, you apparently have not been following this for the past few years.
Let me break this down to you, Google and Motorala (Google owned now) are not paying for disputed patents that Microsoft is claiming regarding Android.
Other hardware manufacturers that are using Android as their OS have made agreements with Microsoft to AVOID litigation (they may or may not have a case, but they are not siding with Google and Motorolla on this) and pay Microsoft royalties on each device they sell with Android.
Again, Google and Motrola are in disagreement with Microsoft and are not paying the same royalties other manufacturers are.
http://cdn.androidpolice.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/7624.androidpatent.jpg
http://www.androidpolice.com/2011/10/24/microsoft-getting-royalties-from-over-half-of-android-phone-sales-plus-an-interesting-android-licensing-infographic/
I may have said Samsung in my earlier post, should have put Motorola.
Bang on, its the Patent office that is stifling innovation not promoting it by giving frivolous patents to these large firms. That then in turn have the monetary clout to bully smaller firms and competitors around. It's not really protecting innovation more protecting monopolies and oligopolies.
So really, Motorola are to blame for dragging Google into this
...
Technically speaking, the item that has not been licensed and Google are not paying royalties for could be something as small as the equivalent of a lighbulb filament and Google are utilising it to create the Christmas Tree lights outside the Trump Tower (example) so whilst Google maps may be a ubiquitous tool and reknown throughout the world, it would shine nearly as brightly if not for the tiny bit of Microsoft owned IP
...
If this were RAMBUS I would be the first to call patent-troll but Microsoft do have theor own actual products that are having marketshare impinged through Googles continued use. But here's the killer point, Microsoft have not sought and do not want to seek and injunction, the do not want Google products banned and their code stripped out, they just want what is rightly licensable so that everyone can have a share of the pie. That is the fundamental difference between Microsoft and Apple, Apple want everyone else dead. Microsoft just want you to pay fairly for what you use.
Droidsheep will not agree of course. Hard to acknowledge the truth. I just hope US tech companies can play well together instead of going to court to under cut each other which will stifle innovation. Though I will agree that if you do not play well with others then there is no other choice than to go to court.
probably because apple took someone to court over a rounded rectangle.
microsoft, for all i think the patent is bs, at least has a legitimate patent, not some design patent .