Download the
Tom's Guide App from the AppsStore
News and trends on internet
/ mobile / "sound & picture" / IT
Yes No

Minimalist Digital Watch is a 4cm Square

- By - Source : Tom's Guide US

By staying away from edgy yet ultimately dated stylized aesthetics, the Sputnik watch is a potential classic

The unimaginatively-named Sputnik is nevertheless a creatively-designed watch that shows that less is more.

Essentially a four-centimeter square that's a centimeter thick, Sputnik is a plane-jane digital watch. The watch's strap threads through a slot on the main unit, making the whole design look like a thick waistband with a flattened ornament.

Even better, Sputnik is actually available for pre-order! This means we can actually share some spec with you, for a better idea of how this tiny modern timekeeping piece works. To quote verbatim from the site:

  • Size: 40 x 40 x 10mm/Band Width: 30mm
  • Color: Black, White, Silver and 16 bright colors 
  • Water Resistance: 3ATM 
  • Functions: Alarm, Chronograph, Date, Time 
  • Battery: CR2016 Battery (3.0VDC Operating Voltage) 
  • Module: 32,768Hertz Quartz Crystal Oscillation Frequency 
  • Display: TDF LCD Display 
  • Electroluminescent(EL): Backlight (with Auto – EL option) 
  • Case Material: ABS plastic 
  • Case Back: ABS plastic /Screw In 
  • Wristband: Silicone and ABS plastic buckle 
  • Warranty: 1 Year

You can order Vadim Kibardin's creation through the link below. Unfortunately, as Kibardin's online shop isn't 100% working yet, you'll have to inquire for specific details on price and shipping costs.

Sputnik @ Kibardindesign

Share:
26
Comments
X

Comments

shin0bi272 06/08/2010 3:14 AM
Hide
-10+

ladies and gentlemen the iWatch.

let the countdown to the apple lawsuit begin...

g-thor 06/08/2010 3:15 AM
Hide
-5+

Interesting. I have to disagree with you, Rico. Being old enough to remember, I think Sputnik is a good name. It evokes the time when that was the first man-made satellite orbiting earth. I remember being outside at night, watching the sky to see it - and I remember the first time I saw it. For some, the name carries an old promise of the future, so it gets some nostalgia points.

captainnemojr 06/08/2010 3:23 AM
Hide
-3+

Now if they can just remake the Super Mario Bros. watch I used to have.

vartok 06/08/2010 4:14 AM
Hide
-5+

Steve Jobs: "Call it the "iWatch" and double... no triple the price "

husker 06/08/2010 4:23 AM
Hide
-7+

Why is the watch so bulky? I think with today's technology the watch itself should be indistinguishable from the band.

twisted politiks 06/08/2010 4:37 AM
Hide
-7+

guys, guys... this thing works, it can't be an iWatch.

:D :D :D

stingstang 06/08/2010 6:12 AM
Hide
-2+

Is the selling point just the size of it?....cause I have a 5 dollar watch that's about half as thick. It's black too, oooooh!

agnickolov 06/08/2010 7:02 AM
Hide
-2+

Well, the name means companion for those that don't know Russian. I don't know if it's imaginative or not, but the name is definitely apt...

eklipz330 06/08/2010 6:59 AM
Hide
-0+

i like it. lol

lightbulbsocket 06/08/2010 7:30 AM
Hide
-0+

I'm not a "watch guy" but if it didn't feel to bulky I'd probably wear one. I think the Q-time watch on their website would be way cooler (if it works) though.

1st duke of marlborough 06/08/2010 9:18 AM
Show
gilbertfh 06/08/2010 9:25 AM
Hide
-2+

Maybe I am old fashioned but I like normal looking watches... To me this is ugly.

princeofdreams 06/08/2010 1:13 PM
Hide
-1+

Looks like something cheap bought from a street vendor, though I am sure there are lots of people who like style over substance, just ask jobs :)

jellico 06/08/2010 3:40 PM
Hide
-1+

Kinda retro looking... and ugly as sin. It's not exactly cutting edge, so I'm not quite sure where the "technology" part of the article is. Is there a USB drive tucked away in that monstrosity that we can't see in the pics?

Pei-chen 06/08/2010 4:19 PM
Hide
-4+

The 60s' called and they want their technology back.

bildo123 06/08/2010 4:35 PM
Hide
-0+

Ugly, do not want.

misry 06/08/2010 5:00 PM
Hide
-0+

pei-chen :
The 60s' called and they want their technology back.



You're thinking `70's and it was LED's that you had to push a button on. It weighed .3 pounds and battery life was measured in the number of times the output was viewed.

lamorpa 06/08/2010 5:13 PM
Hide
-1+

It's way to thick and large. I would think that a minimalist watch would be small. Is this a joke?

Hupiscratch 06/08/2010 5:35 PM
Hide
-0+

One day I saw an Ekranoplan watch. It was HUGE, just like the original Ekranoplan KM.

thekitty 06/08/2010 6:00 PM
Hide
-1+

An iWatch needs iTunes connectivity to change the time or adjust the wristband.

joelupchurch 06/08/2010 6:49 PM
Hide
-1+

Who wears a watch anymore? If I need to know the time, I just check my phone.

cekasone 06/08/2010 7:05 PM
Hide
-0+

next week there will be a gold plated version with diamonds all around it costing 50k

Anonymous 06/08/2010 7:22 PM
Hide
-0+

Heeeeey, don't be calling Jane a plane...or plain :P

gm0n3y 06/08/2010 9:40 PM
Hide
-0+

Why is this on Toms? It is technology from 40 years ago. And not even interesting old tech.

zaznet 06/09/2010 6:17 PM
Hide
-0+

I want a clock that fits in the space of a ring (wedding band) with just the time shown. This thing is huge to make a "minimalist" statement without any serious innovation.

Anonymous 10/17/2010 10:27 PM
Hide
-0+

lol, its huge like iPod nano :p