Source: Tom's Guide | Keywords: Asus, 900, eee | Themes: Laptops and Notebooks
- 1. More: Screen and Scrolling
- 2. More: Storage and Memory
1. More: Screen and Scrolling
With the original Eee PC, ASUS made a tiny footprint and a tiny price tag desirable, even with tiny storage and basic performance. If you’ve been hanging on for the Windows XP version, the Eee PC 900 gives you more than just the choice of OS, with a larger screen, more memory and more storage. But does that mean small and cheap is looking big and bloated?
From the outside, the Eee 900 looks almost identical to the previous model, if you choose white rather than the promised range of pastel colors; it’s a fraction larger and more than a fraction heavier.
Open the lid and the 8.9" screen is a big improvement over the original 7" screen, because now you can see a whole Web page or a full document without scrolling or zooming out. The resolution goes up from a tiny 800 by 480 to a reasonable 1024 by 600, or 1280 by 768 if you want to scroll to see the whole screen. The quality of the screen is average for a notebook. Even at full brightness it is hard to see in direct sunlight and you couldn’t call it vivid, rich or colorful. Pictures tend to look bland and washed out but video fares better and detail is crisp.
The larger screen doesn’t make the case much bigger because it takes up the dead space in the lid formerly used for the speakers. These disappear underneath, reducing the already average sound quality even further. That means there’s no extra room for the keyboard and ASUS has made virtually no changes to the layout or key spacing, which means it is still too small for adult fingers to type on comfortably at any speed. Anyone looking for a usable keyboard in this size of PC would do better with the HP Mini-Note, which fits keys that are only 8% smaller than a normal notebook keyboard into virtually the same size case as the Eee.
The trackpad does change. It’s wider, so it’s a better match to where you want to put the cursor on screen, and the two buttons are more responsive. ASUS has also added Mac-style multi-touch, which it calls FingerGlide. This allows you to scroll up and down by swiping two fingers anywhere on the touchpad, which is certainly more convenient than using a marked area at the side of the pad. It also gives you two-finger zoom. Although pinch and stretching with your fingers zooms images out and in, rotating your fingers on the touchpad works rather better.
This is the first time we’ve seen multi-touch on Windows and the innovation ought to be a huge leap forward, because without a touchscreen it’s awkward to scroll and zoom normally if you’re trying to hold the Eee in one hand. Unfortunately, the touchpad is so tiny that you still have to make very small, controlled movements to get exactly the zoom level you want. This could improve as more software supports multi-touch input and gestures are better understood.
Also improved is the Webcam, which goes from 0.3 to 1.3 megapixels. The fixed focus and poor depth of field make it a very basic tool suitable only for adding video to an IM. You pay a lot more for higher-quality Webcams and this is both cheap and integrated, but even so the quality is disappointing.
- Next page More: Storage and Memory



Do not get fooled by Asus! How can you imagine if there is only 4GB in C:
I think most people do not expect it is 4GB + 12GB for Windows XP Home version or 4GB + 16GB for Linux version (P.2 is wrong in this article)
Asus does not mentioned that in the USA website
http://usa.asus.com/products.aspx? [...] odelmenu=2
But mentioned in Taiwan website (Chinese, but anyone can read the SSD part)
http://tw.asus.com/products.aspx?l [...] odelmenu=2
One problem I have with the review is the Windows-centric approach to a machine that is built for Linux. My "favourite applications" all run on Linux but not necessarily on Windows.
Secondly, what's with the outdated fear-mongering about driver availability in Linux? Generally there are fewer driver problems with Linux than with Windows these days, for the simple reason that hardware manufacturers don't want to lose that share of their business.
With Windows you still get asked to provide driver disks and have to decide whether you want the latest Windows version or the manufacturers version. Not a problem with Linux.
Nor do you have to worry about a driver not being available for your version of Windows. With Linux the drivers are kept up to date and frequently back-ported to earlier versions of the kernel. Poor Windows users have to agonize over which version of Windows has the drivers for their hardware. And they to pay for their decisions.
alantlchan seems to have it right. There are two versions and both start with a 4G flash disk. I've also read another review that states you can get the smaller storage version with Linux for a reduced price. I haven't seen it advertised for sale anywhere however. Of course, it's still hard to find the new models advertised anywhere.