The Google Pixel 8 Pro didn’t get this upgrade — and it’s a problem

Google Pixel 8 Pro hands-on.
(Image credit: Future)

I honestly had low expectations for the Pixel 8 Pro — so much so that I largely didn’t pay much attention to all the leaks in the build-up to the phone's release this week. However, my mind quickly changed once the Pixel 8 Pro was officially announced at the Made by Google event, and I got to check it out in person during my hands-on time

It's an impressive phone, but there was one odd thing that flew under the radar and got under my skin. The Pixel 8 Pro features a godawful 128GB of storage in its base model.

For the last few years, 128GB has been the industry standard for most high-end smartphones. But as we’ve seen this year, that’s all changed. Google spent a lot of time talking about all of the Pixel 8 Pro's cool new features, like the enhanced Call Screen capabilities that actually make Google Assistant sound and act more like a real assistant. Then there’s also the new Pro Controls and Magic Audio Eraser with the cameras — but while they all add greater depth to the phone’s utility — I’m still shocked that Google neglected to up the storage of the device.

Making 128GB as the starting storage option  is unacceptable for a high-end flagship phone in 2023. Here’s why.

Other flagships start with 256GB of storage

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra vs iPhone 15 Pro Max

(Image credit: Future)

Like I mentioned, the Pixxel 8 Pro's two biggest rivals both start off at 256GB of storage. What’s even more astounding was that Apple decided to give the iPhone 15 Pro Max the upgrade treatment, going from the previous 128GB starting storage of the iPhone 14 Pro Max to 256GB. I didn’t expect that to happen because Apple usually waits longer than other phone makers to increase capacity on its phones.

Then again, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra arrived earlier in the year and Apple probably didn’t want its main rival to take the storage spotlight. That's why it really doesn’t benefit the Pixel Pro 8 to start off with 128GB. I understand that it makes sense for the $699 Pixel 8 to go that route, but the extra $300 Google charges for the Pixel 8 Pro demands greater capacity.

Camera-centric phones deserve more storage

Google Pixel 8 Pro hands-on.

(Image credit: Future)

Google talked big about the cameras of the Pixel 8 Pro. All of the new Google AI experiences powered by the Tensor G3 are motivating people to use their phone's cameras more than ever before. The Pixel 8 Pro's main 50MP camera is a strong contender in catapulting the Pixel 8 Pro as one of the best camera phones this year, especially when it can stitch together the perfect family photo shot with Google's new Best Take feature.

Pixel 8 Pro owners would be inclined to shoot a lot more photos due to these new features, along with editing them to perfection — leading me to my point that 128GB is yet again insufficient storage. I understand that Google Photos should help offset some of the load by backing up media to the cloud. However, that also comes with an added cost that could add up quickly.

Take for example one of the Pixel 8 Pro’s exclusive features, Video Boost, which will come to the phone later this year. Video Boost lets you upload RAW videos to the cloud where you can enhance them with the processing muscle of Google’s data centers. The ideal result is an even better -ooking video for you to download later. 

These videos have the potential to add up and take up storage space, especially when they’re captured at 4K 60fps. I’m a videographer and know how much these files can be crush your storage.

Low cost storage upgrade options

Google Pixel 8 Pro hands-on.

(Image credit: Future)

My frustration about a 128GB Pixel 8 Pro could’ve easily been remedied with an expandable storage option. But you know what? It’s been years since a microSD slot was included in a Google-made smartphone, so there’s no practical method of expanding its paltry starting storage — unless you’re willing to pay more.

Pixel 8 Pro models with 256GB, 512GB, and 1TB capacities cost $1,059, $1,179, and $1,399 respectively. At least, these options actually give you better storage bang for the buck than the 1TB iPhone 15 Pro Max, which sets you back $1,599 .

These are great alternatives to solving my unquenchable storage thirst, but it’s still mind-boggling that Google thinks it’s appropriate to start out at 128GB. I’ve been using the Galaxy Z Fold 4 for more than a year now, and when I take a quick peek at its storage tally, I’ve already used up 81% of the 256GB of internal storage — so there’s no way I could properly transfer everything to the Pixel 8 Pro.

More from Tom's Guide

John Velasco
Senior Channel Editor for Phones

John’s a senior editor covering phones for Tom’s Guide. He’s no stranger in this area having covered mobile phones and gadgets since 2008 when he started his career. On top of his editor duties, he’s a seasoned videographer being in front and behind the camera producing YouTube videos. Previously, he held editor roles with PhoneArena, Android Authority, Digital Trends, and SPY. Outside of tech, he enjoys producing mini documentaries and fun social clips for small businesses, enjoying the beach life at the Jersey Shore, and recently becoming a first time homeowner.

  • Steve55188307
    Storage is the least of the concerns. #1 concern is functionality and performance... Wifi 7 enabled P8P! Great camera and more... Tensor 3! Everything is cloud-based now anyhow; Google Drive, Photos, Mega, Proton Drive, etc. (all free cloud storage); even Gmail has up to 15GB for each free e-mail account. 128GB is plenty for the on-device storage; just transfer & backup the important things on the cloud, or to a PC hard drive - - AWS Amazon cloud; Microsoft account cloud... no problem. Pixel 8 Pro is now the #1 phone available! One thing I will say is that advertising a titanium outer case band on a phone (Apple iPhone 15) is a nothing-burger... who cares?! A phone is swapped-out or traded in every 2 or 3 years anyhow (useless to promote a titanium outer band around the phone). As far as Samsung, they have too much bloatware. Everyone lags behind the top-notch first to receive Android updates and versions provided by Google Pixels. I can't wait to get the Tensor 5 on the Pixel 10 Pro too! In the meantime, I'll be trading-in a P6P for the P8P very soon (depending on who has the best deal).
    Reply
  • leoallen
    For many years, I couldn't understand why so many people are still hung up on "more storage equals better" on smartphones. As so many services are now cloud based, at this point for me storage is an afterthought, if a thought at all. But then I got in a conversation with someone who pointed out that not everyone lives in places where their carriers don't charge for data, so they're still stuck in the era of downloading everything. With that in mind, this article really only applies to those who still download a lot to their cell phones. For people like me (I've been using the Pixel phone since the first model and continue to upgrade to each Pro release) 128GB storage is more than enough. In fact, anything above that is literally a waste for me.
    Reply
  • Salut
    The author seems to feel that because 128GB isn't enough for him, that it isn't enough for almost anybody.

    The entry-level storage doesn't matter as long as the device is still reasonably usable, and 128GB is plenty for people who take photos/videos on a casual basis, those who pay for cloud storage, and those who are happy with moving their media to local storage (such as a NAS) every so often. Which people who care about privacy might want to do anyway.

    The photos I have from my entire life, including scans of photos and slides all the way back to the 1950s, consume only 100GB.

    What matters is price. Don't complain because Google provided an extra storage/price point that's useless to you. They dropped the adder to get to 256GB down from $100 on the Pixel 7 series to $60 on the Pixel 8 series.

    I have a hard time accepting that the author would be less irritated with Google if they actually eliminated a purchase option. So if Google made the entry level Pixel 8 Pro the $1,059 256GB model, then the author would be happy? Probably he would then complain about price, even though this flagship would still be well under a comparably-equipped phone from Samsung or Apple, considering Google's steep promotional discounts.
    Reply
  • xenofastiq
    leoallen said:
    For many years, I couldn't understand why so many people are still hung up on "more storage equals better" on smartphones. As so many services are now cloud based, at this point for me storage is an afterthought, if a thought at all. But then I got in a conversation with someone who pointed out that not everyone lives in places where their carriers don't charge for data, so they're still stuck in the era of downloading everything. With that in mind, this article really only applies to those who still download a lot to their cell phones. For people like me (I've been using the Pixel phone since the first model and continue to upgrade to each Pro release) 128GB storage is more than enough. In fact, anything above that is literally a waste for me.
    Yeah, and that's the thing. Sure, there are some people that may end up being able to benefit from more storage, or want more storage, but to try and make the claim that the majority of people NEED 256GB as the base storage is simply ridiculous. While it would definitely be NICE if they upped the base storage, it's definitely not something that's needed, and as they said in the article, if you compare the 1TB option to the iPhone 15 Pro Max, it's $1400 to the iPhone's $1600. For those going the Pixel route and absolutely NEED more storage, you only pay $60 per extra 128GB that you get.
    Reply
  • xenofastiq
    I'm curious, why is this a "problem" exactly? The 8 Pro at 128GB starts at $999.

    iPhone 15 Pro at 128GB starts at $999. If you want the Pro Max, you get 256GB at $1199.

    Do you know how much you get the 256GB 8 Pro for? $1059. And the regular iPhone 15 Pro for $1099. If you absolutely NEEDED 256GB, you are still paying less for 256GB on the Pixel vs the iPhones. The only difference is that the 128GB option gives people a chance to pay less if they DONT need 128GB. People who want the Pro Max? Tough. You have to pay $1199 for 256GB even if you don't need double the storage of the regular 15Pro base model.
    Reply
  • Salut
    Yes, you cannot make a judgement about base storage in a vacuum. It goes hand-in-hand with price.

    For example, if Google was to offer a 96GB entry-level Pixel 8 Pro for only $200 total, how could that be seen as anything other than an unbeatable option for users who have modest needs for storage (or who are happy to save $800 and transfer their photos to cloud or local storage occasionally)?

    Similarly, if Google was to drop the 128GB option but raise the price of the 256GB option to $1,500, would this author celebrate the fact that Google has seen the light and now has an entry-level device with 256GB? I doubt it; he would complain about the price.
    Reply
  • Branbro
    yeah, you are right it's such a horrible problem that Google gave people more storage options. How dare them?
    Reply
  • dennyjoshuar
    How about just pretend the 128 doesn't exist? The 256 is still cheaper than the iPhone anyway 🤦‍♂️
    Reply
  • Jean Yus
    Rent a storage unit. Go to office depot and buy 700,000,000,000 memory sticks. Place memory sticks in storage unit. You'll never need to stress about Pixels having enough storage again. You're welcome.
    Reply