Club Benefits
Shop for an Android phone today, and you’d be hard-pressed to find a handset with a single rear camera. Even many of the best cheap phones have multiple rear shooters these days. But things are different over in Apple land. The company currently sells not one, but two handsets with a single rear camera: the iPhone Air ($999) and iPhone 17e ($599). I’m not here to debate Apple’s choices. Like many of you, I believe all modern phones should have an ultrawide, and any handset costing more than $500 should also have a telephoto.
I'm also not here to debate people’s choices. Single rear shooter aside, the iPhone Air is extremely slick, and the iPhone 17e delivers great value. Today, I want to compare how these camera systems perform. Any differences in photo quality likely come down to differences in hardware (sensor and lens) since the software (iOS 26) and image processing are identical on both phones. These handsets even share the same ISP (image signal processor) inside their respective A19 Pro and A19 chips.
So let’s find out how these shooters differ on paper and fare in various conditions out in the real world.
iPhone Air vs. iPhone 17e: The hardware
| Row 0 - Cell 0 | iPhone Air | iPhone 17e |
Price | $999 | $599 |
Rear Camera | 48MP (f/1.6) | 48MP (f/1.6) |
Front Camera | 24MP (f/1.9) | 12MP (f/1.9) |
The iPhone Air’s main camera uses the same 48MP 1/1.56-inch 1.0-micron sensor with PDAF and 26mm f/1.6 lens with sensor-shift stabilization as the iPhone 17. Meanwhile, the iPhone 17e’s main shooter consists of a 48MP 1/2.55-inch 0.7-micron sensor with PDAF and 26mm f/1.6 lens with regular OIS. This is the exact same sensor Apple uses for the iPhone 17 and 17 Pro’s ultrawide, as well as the iPhone 17 Pro's telephoto, but with a different lens. Obviously, the iPhone Air beats the iPhone 17e in terms of sensor size and stabilization.
Like other iPhones with 48MP sensors, the rear cameras on both the iPhone Air and iPhone 17e support in-sensor cropping for “optical-quality” 2x zoom alongside 4-in-1 pixel binning, which combines four nearby pixels into one larger pixel for better low-light performance. By default, both shooters take 24MP photos which blend a 48MP shot for detail with multiple pixel-binned 12MP images for dynamic range. You also have the option to shoot at 48MP or 12MP, but night mode and zoomed images are always 12MP.
While the iPhone 17e features a regular (4:3) 12MP 1/3.6-inch 23mm f/1.9 selfie camera with PDAF, the iPhone Air boasts Apple's clever new Center Stage front shooter. It uses a square (1:1) 24MP 1/3.6-inch sensor with PDAF alongside a 23mm f/1.9 lens. This allows you to capture 18MP selfies in any orientation (portrait or landscape) no matter how you hold the phone. Center Stage automatically keeps you centered in the frame, and intelligently rotates and zooms out to fit more people into a shot.
Apple’s Photonic Engine (computational photography imaging pipeline) together with the A19 Pro and A19 chips do most of the heavy lifting here, and enable features like Deep Fusion (neural image processing) and Apple’s next-generation portrait mode (which lets you tweak depth and focus after the fact). Both handsets include Photographic Styles, but only the iPhone Air offers the latest version (with the matrix interface), while the iPhone 17e makes do with the previous generation (with tone and warmth adjustments only).
Photo modes include night, portrait, and panorama (rear only) – which takes ultra-high resolution pictures (up to a massive 63MP). Both the iPhone Air and iPhone 17e record stabilized video with stereo or spatial audio at up to 4k 60fp and support Dolby Vision. Video modes include 24fps (4k), 25fps (4k and 1080p), slow motion (1080p 120fps or 720p 240fps), and time lapse (1080p 30fps). The iPhone Air also includes Action (up to 2.8k) and Dual Capture (up to 4k 30fps) modes, which are missing from the iPhone 17e.
Both phones lack the Cinematic and Spatial video modes found on the iPhone 17 and 17 Pro since those require dual rear cameras, and there’s no dedicated macro mode since that requires an ultrawide. Then again, pulling back and zooming in to 2x with the main shooter often achieves similar results.
iPhone Air vs. iPhone 17e: Daytime
While both phones captured lovely daytime 2x photos of downtown San Francisco as seen from Potrero Hill, the iPhone Air’s image is a little sharper when you pixel peep. The colors in the iPhone 17e’s picture are more accurate and more true to life, however, with the iPhone Air casting a slight reddish tint over the entire shot.
If you look at the skyscrapers in the iPhone 17e’s photo, you’ll notice a faint rainbow-like moiré pattern on the Salesforce Tower and other buildings, a side-effect of demosaicing the sensor’s Bayer filter. This is less pronounced in the iPhone Air’s picture. Overall though, both handsets did a great job with exposure and dynamic range in these images.
Winner: iPhone Air
iPhone Air vs. iPhone 17e: Dynamic range
Check out these cliffside 1x views of Arch Rock in Bodega Bay, California, about an hour before sunset. Here again, the iPhone Air is casting a slight reddish hue over the entire picture, but simply gathers more detail than the iPhone 17e. Just zoom into the flowers in the bottom right quadrant to see the difference.
But ultimately, the iPhone 17e does a better job than the iPhone Air at managing dynamic range, resulting in a more dramatic shot of the clouds and sun rays beaming down into the Pacific ocean.
Winner: iPhone 17e
iPhone Air vs. iPhone 17e: Colors
Here are 3x photos of a colorful high-rise building in Vancouver’s West End that clearly illustrates how much more information the iPhone Air is able to capture. If you zoom into any part of the building, you’ll see that the iPhone 17e’s picture exhibits less detail and more noise.
To my eyes, however, the iPhone 17e’s color rendering is more natural and realistic. By contrast, the iPhone Air’s image looks slightly colder and a little washed out. That being said, as a whole, both phones absolutely nailed this shot.
Winner: iPhone 17e
iPhone Air vs. iPhone 17e: Macro
Both handsets did an excellent job capturing these closeup 2x photos of flowers at Vancouver’s English Bay Beach. Most modern phones implement macro mode by using the ultrawide (with AF) and cropping the resulting image. But without an ultrawide camera, the iPhone Air and iPhone 17e don’t actually have a macro mode. Instead, you can simply use the digital zoom at 2x or 3x and pull back to achieve similar (and often better) results.
While this doesn’t enable extreme closeups, it generally results in a nicer, stronger bokeh (background blur). If you look closely at the background in this shot, you’ll notice that the iPhone Air’s larger sensor delivers a slightly more pronounced bokeh. Like with previous pictures, I prefer the iPhone 17e’s higher contrast and more accurate colors.
Winner: iPhone 17e
iPhone Air vs. iPhone 17e: Digital zoom
In these 4x photos of English Bay Beach in Vancouver’s West End, you can see the limitations of not having a dedicated telephoto shooter. While the iPhone Air captured a sharper image with more detail than the iPhone 17e, it’s abundantly clear that zooming beyond 4x or 5x results in a significant reduction in picture quality on both handsets.
What’s interesting here is that unlike previous shots, the iPhone Air’s photo exhibits more natural colors and higher contrast than the iPhone 17e’s, reversing the trend.
Winner: iPhone Air
iPhone Air vs. iPhone 17e: Panorama
Apple’s panorama mode takes ultra-high resolution photos (up to an impressive 63MP), so it’s not surprising that both these 2x panoramas of San Francisco’s Golden Gate Bridge as seen from Crissy Field’s South Beach are virtually identical when it comes to sharpness and detail.
Once again, the iPhone Air is casting a slight reddish tint over the entire image, which is obvious when looking at the sand. While this is pretty much a toss, I prefer the iPhone 17e’s picture for its more accurate colors.
Winner: iPhone 17e
iPhone Air vs. iPhone 17e: Selfie
Here are 1x photos of me taken with the selfie camera on both phones in Vancouver’s English Bay.
As you can see, these are excellent selfies overall, but the iPhone Air’s picture is a little sharper than the iPhone 17e’s thanks to a higher-resolution sensor (24MP vs. 12MP). Plus, the iPhone Air’s trick Center Stage front shooter — which keeps you centered in the frame, and automatically rotates and zooms out to fit more people into the image — is a serious game changer, and it’s missing from the iPhone 17e.
Winner: iPhone Air
iPhone Air vs. iPhone 17e: Portrait
Check out these 1x portraits of me shot at Vancouver’s Second Beach with the rear camera on both handsets. The iPhone Air does a better job with the fake bokeh (background blur) around my head by preserving most of my stray hairs, but the iPhone 17e’s color rendering is more natural and realistic.
Here again, the iPhone Air is casting a slight reddish hue over the entire photo, and while I prefer the iPhone 17e’s image overall, I believe that handling the fake bokeh properly is more important than relative color accuracy.
Winner: iPhone Air
iPhone Air vs. iPhone 17e: Indoors
Both phones pretty much nailed these 1x indoor photos taken at Farley’s, a coffee shop with a cool magazine stand in San Francisco’s Potrero Hill. Once again, the iPhone Air captured a sharper image than the iPhone 17e, but both handsets did a great job with color accuracy, exposure, and dynamic range.
Winner: iPhone Air
iPhone Air vs. iPhone 17e: Low light
Las Vegas baby! It’s probably the best city in the world for night photography, so I flew to Sin City just to take these photos… That is a lie. Anyway, it turns out that what happens in Vegas doesn’t always stay in Vegas, and these 2x pictures of the Venetian’s Venezia tower and the Las Vegas Strip are perfect examples of how these phones handle low light. Here again, the iPhone Air captures a lot more information than the iPhone 17e, resulting in more sharpness and detail thanks to its larger sensor and better stabilization mechanism.
What really stands out here is how much better the iPhone Air handles dynamic range in these night shots. Just look at the Harrah’s sign on the left or the “neon” lights in the distance on the right. In addition, the iPhone 17e is casting an unpleasant yellowish hue over the entire picture, and while I generally prefer a warmer tone in my photos, this is a miss.
Winner: iPhone Air
iPhone Air vs. iPhone 17e: Verdict
Overall, the iPhone Air and iPhone 17e both take very nice photos that boast natural colors, proper exposure, and a good amount of detail in a wide range of conditions. Dynamic range and low-light performance are decent overall and zooming is fine up to 4-5x. That being said, you can’t beat physics, and the iPhone Air’s larger main sensor and better stabilization mechanism always result in sharper images with significantly more information, especially in low light or when using the digital zoom.
What surprised me most when comparing these handsets is how, given enough light, the iPhone 17e consistently produces shots with more accurate and realistic colors and higher contrast. I prefer these photos over the iPhone Air’s, and it’s only when shooting at night that the iPhone 17e struggles with color accuracy and dynamic range.
Ultimately, if you absolutely must use a phone with a single rear camera, you can’t go wrong with either the iPhone Air or the iPhone 17e. Both deliver consistent results, and ultimately, that’s what’s most important.
Follow Tom's Guide on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds.
More From Tom's Guide
