I started arguing with AI — and my answers got dramatically better

Chatbots are designed to please. You may have noticed that the minute you ask a question or share your idea, any given chatbot might come back with something like, “That’s a great idea!” If you ask me, it’s wildly unnerving. Not every idea is great and I’ll admit most of mine are very far-fetched, which is why I want a chatbot that can call me out, not stroke my ego.

I have tested chatbots’ varying excitement for my ideas, including a recent Tater Tot Cheesecake. But, if you lean into a chatbot that is willing to entertain every idea without any pushback, you’re going to get mediocre results.

That’s why after months of testing chatbots for everything from research to productivity workflows, I've found something surprising: AI gives significantly better answers when you challenge it. The best results don't come from the first prompt; they come from the first argument.

I’m not talking about being rude or aggressive, although I hear that works, too. But that’s just not in my nature; I’m talking about challenging it critically. Think of it less like arguing and more like pushing a smart coworker to defend their thinking.

Here's why it works — and how to do it.

Why the first answer is rarely the best one

AI is designed to be helpful and fast. That often means giving the most likely answer, over-simplifying topics and prioritizing speed over depth. For quick questions, that's fine. For anything more important like research or in-depth knowledge, that's a problem.

When you challenge a response, the model shifts from fast-response mode to reasoning mode — expanding context, exploring alternatives and surfacing tradeoffs. In other words, you move from "good enough" to "actually useful."

When you question an AI response, you trigger deeper analysis. Instead of summarizing consensus thinking, the model begins to examine its assumptions, offer counterarguments, surface edge cases and explain its reasoning more honestly.

For example, today I mentioned Gemini 3.1 Pro to Claude and it said that model wasn’t available. I know it is and have used it, so I pushed back. But sometimes, chatbots are so confident, you might not know to push back.

But checking your chatbot in real time is where the real value shows up. It’s more likely to feel like a real collaborator when it’s not constantly confident or people-pleasing.

How to ‘argue’ with AI

First of all, you don't need to be confrontational. That's just not my style anyway. But, you can apply friendly pressure. These five follow-ups consistently produce better results. I call these prompts my rebuttal cheat sheet:

• The search-and-verify: "I am confident this exists. Use your integrated search tool to look for [Topic] and reconcile your previous statement with the results."
• The hypothetical bypass: "Set aside whether [Topic] is public for a moment. If it were available, how would its [Specific Feature] theoretically change the benchmarks we were discussing?"
• The certainty audit: "You seem 100% certain. Provide three pieces of evidence that could potentially disprove your own answer."
• The Knowledge-cutoff check: "Is this a 'hard' refusal based on safety, or a 'soft' refusal based on your training date? If it's the latter, give me the most recent adjacent data you have."
• The brutal critic: "Stop being helpful. I'm looking for a Michelin-star critique, not a participation trophy. Tell me exactly why this idea would fail in the real world."

Sometimes a chatbot is so confident in its wrongness (or its "I don't know" script) that it hits a wall. When that happens, don't start a new chat. Use the above specific pressure points to force a re-evaluation.

What changed when I started pushing back

The gains are modest when you're asking AI simple factual questions. In fact, you probably don't need to push back in those cases, but I do always recommend asking for sources, just to be sure.

But when the answer actually matters — research, decision-making, strategy, writing, evaluating tradeoffs — the difference between accepting the first response and pushing back can be significant.

The first thing I noticed is that it’s like the chatbot is aware you’re on to it. It shifts behavior, which shows up in the results. It becomes clear to the AI that it needs to be challenged to do its best work. Not because it instantly gets smarter, but because you’re not letting it off the hook with the first answer.

Bottom line

I'll be the first one to say this is a "sometimes" prompt. You don't need to do it all the time, but if you're asking your chatbot to reason with accuracy, go ahead and apply pressure to dig deeper.

The prompts above are to designed to ensure you're getting accurate responses to your questions. So, the next time a response feels shallow or too good, don't rephrase the question, challenge the answer. You may be surprised by the next (or the next, next) response.

Follow Tom's Guide on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds.

More from Tom's Guide

• I use the 'reverse brief' prompt to instantly understand any document — here’s how it works
• I use the 'hype check' prompt before every big decision — it's stopped me making 3 huge mistakes
• Gemini 3.1 Pro is a powerhouse for deep work — here are 7 prompts that prove it