Download the
Tom's Guide App from the AppsStore
News and trends on internet
/ mobile / "sound & picture" / IT
Yes No

Good Vibrations Promise Cheap Wind Power

- By - Source : Tom's Guide US

A better windmill than the old fashioned wind turbine?

We all know the drawbacks of wind power. Aside from space and a sufficient amount of well, wind, power-generating windmills also require a significant investment for construction.

Shawn Frayne devised the Windbelt, which doesn't require lots of space, wind, or money. The system generates power from the vibrations created when even a tiny amount of wind hits a strip of material connected to a magnet.



Windbelt isn't exactly a new invention—it was named by Popular Mechanics for its 2007 Breakthrough Awards—but Frayne was able to create a start-up based on the technology (Humdinger Wind Energy LLC). Three variants of different sizes are scheduled for a demo within this year.

Tthe microWindbelt is a 5" x 1" self-contained unit that generates enough power for sensors or small electronics, while the one-meter long Windcell produces 3 to 5 watts of power. The large-scale Windcell panel, built by bunching Windcells together, will produce 100 watts and cost $1 for every square meter taken up. That's more than enough power to drive a netbook.



A Windbelt still requires sufficient wind to for maximum generation (6m/s or 13mph), but the system can still create power at lower wind speeds. The inventor claims that it is perfect for urban environments, where ever-changing wind conditions minimize (or even eliminate) the effectiveness of rotor-based generators.

Share:
34
Comments
X

Comments

bustapr 03/19/2010 2:24 PM
Hide
-10+

I want to know the instuctions on how to make the little one at home. Itll be an interesting timekiller and its a good idea.Still wished the big one would generate more power but, its cheap and it looks cool. I wonder how much construction will cost.

jtt283 03/19/2010 2:27 PM
Hide
-1+

Now that's cool; basically running a buzzer in reverse. I wonder how well it scales; what would a megawatt installation look (and sound) like?

tomtompiper 03/19/2010 2:45 PM
Hide
-9+

jtt283 :
Now that's cool; basically running a buzzer in reverse. I wonder how well it scales; what would a megawatt installation look (and sound) like?



The more efficient they make it the cooler and quieter it will become, heat and noise are caused by wasted energy.

HibyPrime 03/19/2010 3:01 PM
Hide
-2+

I'd imagine a MW installation would look like a huge array of wide ladders, with the steps being the magnetic vibration thing...

You can bet it would end up fairly loud, but I imagine the sound would just be a hum type sound, so it wouldn't be too intrusive.

Anonymous 03/19/2010 3:13 PM
Hide
-10+

If they could be made sturdy enough, imagine these lining the walls of highway dividers in high traffic areas, plenty of "wind" generated by the traffic

dark_lord69 03/19/2010 3:28 PM
Show
kipsus 03/19/2010 3:57 PM
Show
Rancifer7 03/19/2010 4:05 PM
Hide
-0+

Although the power produced per unit ins't amazing, they are small can you can put them practically anywhere. and they appear MUCH less intrusive than turbines!

Ciuy 03/19/2010 4:10 PM
Show
jellico 03/19/2010 4:20 PM
Hide
-2+

dark_lord69 :
"...will produce 100 watts..."Yeah, but you'd need 10 of those to power a PC with some real muscle. I'd be more excited if it produced more electricity...On the other hand they are small enough that they could but an outlet on these things and let the general public buy it and just plug something into it on a windy day.



I know exactly what you mean. I like the innovation, but I'm still waiting and hoping for the next big breakthrough in energy generation technology. Something along the lines of zero-point energy, or fusion, or even just self-sustaining hydrogen production from seawater.

That's my biggest problem with the whole "alternative energy" movement. People go on and on about needing to break our dependence upon foreign oil, and fossil fuels in general... great, I agree and am all for that. Problem is that we don't have that technology yet. Wind, solar, biofuels, etc. are a bust. They simply don't produce enough power. The United States currently consumes 20 million barrels of oil per day! That's 840 million gallons per day! That doesn't even include coal usage. The only way we're going to move past that is with a revolutionary new technology. A merely evolutionary technology just won't cut it.

gwellin 03/19/2010 4:30 PM
Hide
-6+

dark_lord69 :
"...will produce 100 watts..."Yeah, but you'd need 10 of those to power a PC with some real muscle. I'd be more excited if it produced more electricity...On the other hand they are small enough that they could but an outlet on these things and let the general public buy it and just plug something into it on a windy day.




This has to be one of the dumbest comments I've read on Toms in a while. This technology isn't designed to power a tripple SLI gamming rig in the middle of the ocean. It is designed produce 100 watts to trickle charge a battery source of some kind, or auto transfered into the existing power of a building to reduce the overall cost from the electrical company.

I love how nieve people assume that this technology should somehow instantly replace all the outlets in their parents basement allowing them to pay less rent to said parents when they should have already moved out 12 years ago. Expand your imagination on the possibilites of what this technology can do and you will be impressed. Try to look outside of your tunnel vission.

eyemaster 03/19/2010 5:01 PM
Hide
-1+

I'm kind of scared of the noise this could make. A flapping strip like that is fairly noisy, even the small ones.

husker 03/19/2010 5:17 PM
Hide
-12+

kipsus :
"(6m/s or 13mph)" this looks like a typo


No, it is correct.
6m/s = 6 meters per second
13mph = 13 miles per hour

Marco925 03/19/2010 5:27 PM
Hide
-12+

I can only imagine some guy blowing into one of these things to power his netbook, then passing out.

MxM 03/19/2010 5:32 PM
Hide
-0+

Can you imagine the noise if we actually start using it in the cities? It will be like a bee hive only 100 times louder!

galactica84 03/19/2010 5:32 PM
Hide
-0+

Nice, but what happens when there is snow and the vibration thing gets all clogged up ?

arthur92710 03/19/2010 6:13 PM
Hide
-4+

kipsus :
"(6m/s or 13mph)" this looks like a typo


Typo? did you want 13.4216178 mph?

jblack 03/19/2010 6:24 PM
Hide
-0+

I wonder how snow effects these units.

Anonymous 03/19/2010 6:25 PM
Show
victomofreality 03/19/2010 6:26 PM
Hide
--1+

tomtompiper :
The more efficient they make it the cooler and quieter it will become, heat and noise are caused by wasted energy.



ummm no... there is almost no heat generated by wind energy and noise isn't a waste of energy... the drag and friction that are responsible for generating the heat and noise are what needs to be cut down for efficiency.

kikireeki 03/19/2010 7:00 PM
Hide
-0+

Well good vibrations can generate a lot of good things!

geof2001 03/19/2010 7:05 PM
Hide
-0+

Good Vibrations is a sex toy shop in the SF area. I was seriously confused reading that headline.

Anonymous 03/19/2010 8:39 PM
Show
fracture 03/19/2010 10:24 PM
Show
JohnnyLucky 03/19/2010 11:54 PM
Hide
-0+

very cool stuff if practical versions can be developed.

albion000 03/20/2010 1:09 AM
Hide
-0+

Dude's sitting next to a fan to show generation on demand. The wind is not generally available inside at speeds approaching 13 mph. Do you expect to put these indoors, or have them generating at all times? C'mon.

caparc 03/20/2010 3:40 AM
Hide
-2+

That's yesterday's news and so is the Chevy Volt. I'm going to blow everybody out of the water with this little honey. http://www.thumbpower.net/images/windcar.jpg I'll be RICH!

bayouboy 03/20/2010 5:45 AM
Hide
-0+

As an engineer, I need to ask the obvious question. You title the article "Good Vibrations Promise Cheap Wind Power". Okay, how cheap? What price per KW/h are we looking at here? The article doesn't say how much these units cost compared to their power output. Fixed costs of dollar per KW/h and operating costs are the only important numbers when it comes to MW scale power production. So, fill me in. Nothing here looks cheap or expensive to me, and, in fact, I can't determine if this is a cheap source of generating electricity or not. I don't understand the title of your article at all!

anamaniac 03/20/2010 8:38 AM
Hide
--1+

husker :
No, it is correct.6m/s = 6 meters per second13mph = 13 miles per hour


If you're going to use the metric system, you may as well do it the Canadian way. :)
6 metres per second.

caparc 03/20/2010 11:37 AM
Hide
-0+

bayouboy :
Okay, how cheap? What price per KW/h are we looking at here?

The device is a curiosity, a toy. Unfortunately so are the 400' tall ones. There are efforts to bring windmills into to my rural neighborhood. It's a sad thing to watch the community and friendships being torn apart by the disagreements over them. This little gaget is the most useful wind energy device I've seen. At least it's good for a laugh.

FilthPig2004 03/20/2010 5:14 PM
Hide
--1+

The link in the article says that the cost of a 1 sq. meter panel is $1/watt, not $1. So the panel costs $100.