Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Pandora Jacks Price for One Service, Abandons Annual Plan

By - Source: Tom's Guide US | B 5 comments

It's getting harder to make money off of music these days, and Pandora is changing its subscription model in an effort to stay profitable. The company announced on its blog that it will be hiking the price for new subscriptions to its ad-free Pandora One service.

Instead of paying $3.99 per month (or $36 a year), those who sign up for Pandora's One starting in May will pay $4.99 a month. The service provider is also removing its annual subscription option.

Existing Pandora One subscribers have nothing to worry about for now. Active subscriptions will continue to cost $3.99 a month, though Pandora does mention a price increase will not be implemented "at this time," which we think means the company intends to change that in the future. Annual subscribers who want to stay on will be migrated to a $3.99 monthly plan, which represents a 99 cent increase per month.

MORE: Best Bluetooth Speakers 2014

The reason for the price hike? Pandora cites growing costs because of increased royalty rates paid to performers. However, the company says this change should affect only 3.3 million monthly subscribers (out ot more than 250 million total registered users). The company's new fees for its ad-free option is still significantly cheaper than Spotify's $9.99 a month, although the latter's service boasts offline playback.

According to a 2011 study by NPD Group (via Recode), consumers are willing to spend between $45 and $65 per year on music, and Pandora's new prices put it in the higher end of that spectrum at $60 a year. That is still comfortably within range though, compared to Spotify's nearly $120 a year total. The same goes for similar services such as Rdio and Beats Music (both $9.99 per month).

While it is cheaper, Pandora doesn't give you as much control over what you listen to (it's more like a radio than a custom playlist setup), and it has a smaller library than the rest. If you're looking for more features, Spotify, Rdio or Beats may serve you better, but those who are cash-strapped and want a cheaper alternative will find Pandora a more affordable option, even with the price hike.

Follow Cherlynn Low at @CherlynnLow and on Google+. Follow Tom's Guide at @tomsguide, on Facebook and on Google+.

Add your comment Display 5 Comments.
  • 2 Hide
    zubikov , March 19, 2014 9:33 AM
    I can't stand streaming music ads, so I was a Pandora One subscriber for two years now w/ the annual $36 subscription. I recently tried the iTunes radio and really liked it. It's immediately apparent that the iTunes catalog is way larger than Pandora's, and they're featured stations are solid.Now that I'm faced with either paying $25 for the year, or $48 for the year (that's with the $1 monthly discount), I'm obviously going with iTunes radio, it's a no-brainer.. There are too many legit streaming music choices out there to remain loyal to Pandora. Spotify premium is another great choice btw.
  • 3 Hide
    theclash150 , March 19, 2014 10:25 AM
    "The company's new fees for its ad-free option is still significantly cheaper than Spotify's $9.99 a month, although the latter's service boasts offline playback."You're comparing apples to oranges here. Spotify and Pandora offer radically different services. Spotify allows the user to select individual songs for playback as well as using a radio function whereas Pandora only has a radio function.
  • 0 Hide
    Evolution2001 , March 19, 2014 10:49 AM
    I've been a Pandora subscriber since the early days of the service. I really want to be able to remain with them, but unfortunately they are getting eclipsed by other services. I resented iHeartRadio because it seemed like a clear case of the corporate giant (ClearChannel) setting out to squash the little guy pioneers. Unfortunately, the almighty dollar rules and I have to concede that iHeartRadio has a waaay deeper playlist namely because they aren't paying any royalties since they are the owner of the music.I've found myself slowly migrating to iHeartRadio for the variety that Pandora simply doesn't offer. It makes me sad, but it is what it is... :-(That being said, I did manage to discover other artists in Pandora's early days and had subsequently went out and bought the albums of these artists that were new to me. So in that sense, Pandora was a success for some artists.
  • 0 Hide
    CaedenV , March 19, 2014 11:02 AM
    I have really enjoyed Pandora, but with the price hikes I think I am going to go back to throwing money at my MP3 collection again.I am oddly finding that I feel that way about most media now. When streaming videos and music was dirt cheap, free, or had very few commercials then it was awesome... but with rising subscription costs, more commercials, or in the case of Hulu having to deal with both, I think I'd rather just buy media, rip it to my server, and enjoy without having to worry about buffering and crap.
  • 0 Hide
    unknown_ , March 19, 2014 1:21 PM
    That's it, music industry, increase your royalty rates for subscription stream services...that way you will trigger yet another crash once people stop paying and start pirating again...ahahahahaha, these guys...I am in tears laughing!
React To This Article

Tom’s guide in the world
  • Germany
  • France
  • Italy
  • Ireland
  • UK
Follow Tom’s guide
Subscribe to our newsletter