Michigan lawmakers call for total VPN ban as part of a proposed 'public morals' bill

News
By published

ISPs would be charged with blocking VPNs and sales would be banned

State flag of Michigan flying in front of its Capitol building
(Image credit: RiverNorthPhotography / Getty Images)

A bill proposed in the US state of Michigan seeks to ban the use and sale of VPN services.

Titled the "Anticorruption of Public Morals Act," the bill aims to "prohibit the distribution of certain material on the internet that corrupts the public morals."

VPN usage monitored and sales banned

The bill's primary role is to stop the distribution of adult content and calls on internet service providers (ISPs) operating in the state to "implement mandatory filtering technology" to block access to the proscribed material.

Reports suggest all forms of adult content would be blocked, including video, audio, magazine, AI-generated content, manga, and even depictions of transgender people.

The proposal also seeks to prevent adult content from being accessed through privacy tools like VPNs, which enable users to bypass these types of online restrictions.

It states that ISPs should "actively monitor and block known circumvention tools." ISPs should also block access to websites that host prohibited material.

Person holding smartphone with VPN lettering crossed out

(Image credit: Diy13 / Getty Images)

The sale of circumvention tools would also be banned. This would reportedly include both US-based and foreign VPN providers.

Fines are being proposed for those who access prohibited material. The bill says any commercial entity or ISP "that knowingly facilitates access to prohibited material" could face a fine of up to $500,000 for each violation.

The bill was introduced on September 11, 2025, by Republican representative Josh Schriver and sponsored by a further five Republican representatives.

It was referred to the Committee on Judiciary, which will discuss and debate the bill before deciding on its next steps.

Dangerous attack on internet freedoms

At the time of writing, there is no indication of how widespread this bill's support is or how likely it is to become law. However, it represents a dangerous attack on internet freedoms and online privacy tools.

Seeking to block access to certain websites and prosecute individuals for using a VPN resembles internet censorship tactics we have seen across authoritarian countries, rather than a Western democracy.

Enacting a blanket, state-wide ban on the sale of VPNs would significantly impact the online privacy of millions and target VPN users who simply want to protect their personal data or use one of the best streaming VPNs.

VPNs can encrypt your internet traffic, spoof your location by changing your IP address, and protect your data from malicious third-parties.

We have seen unjust attacks on VPNs in the UK through the implementation of the Online Safety Act. VPNs have been targeted in France in a bid to tackle online piracy. Russia, Pakistan, and Myanmar have all cracked down on VPNs, and 24 cases of internet restrictions were recorded in the first six months of 2025.

Disclaimer

We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example: 1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service). 2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad. We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.

George Phillips
George Phillips
Staff Writer

George is a Staff Writer at Tom's Guide, covering VPN, privacy, and cybersecurity news. He is especially interested in digital rights and censorship, and its interplay with politics. Outside of work, George is passionate about music, Star Wars, and Karate.

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.