Busted: Social Websites Sharing Personal Data
Many popular social networking websites send user information to advertising companies without user consent.
Various social websites including Facebook and MySpace have been caught sending personal data to advertising companies without consent. The information typically contains user names or ID numbers tied to personal profiles being viewed when users click on ads. The info is then sent to said external companies, and could be used to gather additional information such as occupations, real names, family members and their addresses, and more depending on what's actually been made public.
Although many of the social websites defended the collection practice, Facebook and MySpace quickly moved to make changes when questions were brought on by the Wall Street Journal. The Journal said that by Thursday morning, Facebook had already rewritten some of the offending computer code. It also named Google Inc.'s DoubleClick and Yahoo Inc.'s Right Media as two of the data recipients, however both claimed that they were unaware of receiving data from the social networking websites.
"If you are looking at your profile page and you click on an ad, you are telling that advertiser who you are," said Ben Edelman, an assistant professor at Harvard Business School who studies Internet advertising. Edelman was asked by the Journal to review the code of seven sites in question. Now both parties are bringing the Federal Trade Commission into the picture, asking it to investigate Facebook's data-collection practices.
A report on personal data collection was first filed by researchers at AT&T Labs and Worcester Polytechnic Institute last August. The paper pinpointed twelve social websites and detailed how outside companies could collect personal data. Many of the sites confirmed the problem. Unfortunately, the same problem still exists nine months later... except for Facebook.
"We fixed this case as soon as we heard about it," a Facebook spokesperson said.
In addition to Facebook and MySpace, other listed culprits include Hi5, Digg, Xanga, Live Journal, Twitter, and many others. To read the full report, head here.
- A Bike Commuter's Dream Parking Lot
- The Kamasutra-Inspired Car Design
- Google: We Saved You From a Draconian Future
- Australia Can Search Laptops, Phones for Porn
- Froyo Update: Carriers Control Who Has Tethering
- End of Facebook Near? 60% Ready to Dump Site
- Sony: We're Not Arrogant; Apple is Arrogant!
- Android 3.0 ''Gingerbread'' Due in Q4 of This Year
- Murderer Uses Google Earth to Target Victim
- The WJE168 Turntable You've Never Seen Before
- Replica Batpod From The Dark Knight on Auction
- HP Envy 15 Users Suffering Blank Screens
- Wikileaks founder Told Passport is Being Canceled
- VIDEO: Samsung Breaks Dodgeball World Record
- The Controller for Your Superficial Web Life
- Paper Supercapacitors Coming Soon
- The Lamp With No Light Bulb
- Facebook's CEO on Privacy: We Missed the Mark
- The Green Samba Electric Jet Ski Can Hit 65MPH
... and what else is new?
yeah this isn't surprising. who clicks on the ads anyway, they're mostly just garbage. especially on Myspace, god that site has gone downhill fast!
Facebook, eh??? Dumbf*cks!
Facebook, eh??? Dumbf*cks!
TRUSTING Dumbf*cks
There is no such thing as privacy on the web.
Wait a second! Someone really clicks on ads? They deserve to be hacked.
I don't even see the ads. AdBlock + Firefox.
Adblock+Chrome blocks more for me than Adblock+Firefox
Noscript+Firefox wins either way, however
Wait a second! Someone really clicks on ads? They deserve to be hacked.
Exactly. As some above users, I use Adblock, and I haven't seen an ad on Facebook since I signed up. Also, according to a few sites I've read, theoretically Adblock prevents the ads from ever actually loading (instead of just 'not showing'), which means they aren't getting any revenue from me.
You want to know why they do it? The only consequence for them getting caught is that they stop doing it.
Everything is about getting our money.. As popular as social websites are I hope this doesnt surprise anyone.
I wonder how they were caught? Does the offending code run on the client machine or the web server?
Adblock+Chrome blocks more for me than Adblock+FirefoxNoscript+Firefox wins either way, however
I got one better: NO Facebook
Adblock+Chrome blocks more for me than Adblock+FirefoxNoscript+Firefox wins either way, however
There is no such thing as an ad "block" with chrome. The best it can ever do is ad "hide". Chrome simply lacks content policies to be able to implement proper "blocking" like Firefox's adblock.
That is why I do not join any of the mentioned social service websites.
everyone one of these stories has people coming out of the woodwork to boast how much better they are because they don't join these sites, well sorry, but as long as you're not a complete moron, these sites are fine and a good way to keep in contact with people. You don't want to join them thats fine, but really, it doesn't make you any better a person because you don't.
everyone one of these stories has people coming out of the woodwork to boast how much better they are because they don't join these sites, well sorry, but as long as you're not a complete moron, these sites are fine and a good way to keep in contact with people. You don't want to join them thats fine, but really, it doesn't make you any better a person because you don't.
Not better, just smarter.