Download the
Tom's Guide App from the AppsStore
News and trends on internet
/ mobile / "sound & picture" / IT
Yes No
Ads

Busted: Social Websites Sharing Personal Data

- By - Source : Tom's Guide US

Many popular social networking websites send user information to advertising companies without user consent.

Various social websites including Facebook and MySpace have been caught sending personal data to advertising companies without consent. The information typically contains user names or ID numbers tied to personal profiles being viewed when users click on ads. The info is then sent to said external companies, and could be used to gather additional information such as occupations, real names, family members and their addresses, and more depending on what's actually been made public.

Although many of the social websites defended the collection practice, Facebook and MySpace quickly moved to make changes when questions were brought on by the Wall Street Journal. The Journal said that by Thursday morning, Facebook had already rewritten some of the offending computer code. It also named Google Inc.'s DoubleClick and Yahoo Inc.'s Right Media as two of the data recipients, however both claimed that they were unaware of receiving data from the social networking websites.

"If you are looking at your profile page and you click on an ad, you are telling that advertiser who you are," said Ben Edelman, an assistant professor at Harvard Business School who studies Internet advertising. Edelman was asked by the Journal to review the code of seven sites in question. Now both parties are bringing the Federal Trade Commission into the picture, asking it to investigate Facebook's data-collection practices.

A report on personal data collection was first filed by researchers at AT&T Labs and Worcester Polytechnic Institute last August. The paper pinpointed twelve social websites and detailed how outside companies could collect personal data. Many of the sites confirmed the problem. Unfortunately, the same problem still exists nine months later... except for Facebook.

"We fixed this case as soon as we heard about it," a Facebook spokesperson said.

In addition to Facebook and MySpace, other listed culprits include Hi5, Digg, Xanga, Live Journal, Twitter, and many others. To read the full report, head here.

Share:
18
Comments
X

Comments

DjEaZy 05/22/2010 7:12 AM
Hide
-14+

... and what else is new?

stephen0983 05/22/2010 10:05 AM
Hide
-17+

yeah this isn't surprising. who clicks on the ads anyway, they're mostly just garbage. especially on Myspace, god that site has gone downhill fast!

JOSHSKORN 05/22/2010 11:18 AM
Hide
-13+

Facebook, eh??? Dumbf*cks!

nukemaster 05/22/2010 1:04 PM
Hide
-12+

JOSHSKORN :
Facebook, eh??? Dumbf*cks!


:)

Mottamort 05/22/2010 1:16 PM
Hide
-9+

TRUSTING Dumbf*cks :P

JohnnyLucky 05/22/2010 1:43 PM
Hide
-6+

There is no such thing as privacy on the web.

Hupiscratch 05/22/2010 1:57 PM
Hide
-9+

Wait a second! Someone really clicks on ads? They deserve to be hacked.

Memoscorp 05/22/2010 4:50 PM
Hide
-8+

I don't even see the ads. AdBlock + Firefox.

coopchennick 05/22/2010 6:37 PM
Hide
-3+

Adblock+Chrome blocks more for me than Adblock+Firefox

Noscript+Firefox wins either way, however

Kelavarus 05/22/2010 8:34 PM
Hide
-3+

Hupiscratch :
Wait a second! Someone really clicks on ads? They deserve to be hacked.



Exactly. As some above users, I use Adblock, and I haven't seen an ad on Facebook since I signed up. Also, according to a few sites I've read, theoretically Adblock prevents the ads from ever actually loading (instead of just 'not showing'), which means they aren't getting any revenue from me.

LORD_ORION 05/23/2010 12:03 PM
Hide
-4+

You want to know why they do it? The only consequence for them getting caught is that they stop doing it.

TheKurrgan 05/23/2010 3:33 AM
Hide
-2+

Everything is about getting our money.. As popular as social websites are I hope this doesnt surprise anyone.

blackbeastofaaaaagh 05/23/2010 8:20 PM
Hide
-1+

I wonder how they were caught? Does the offending code run on the client machine or the web server?

pythy 05/24/2010 6:41 AM
Hide
-2+

coopchennick :
Adblock+Chrome blocks more for me than Adblock+FirefoxNoscript+Firefox wins either way, however


I got one better: NO Facebook

cruiseoveride 05/24/2010 9:25 AM
Hide
-1+

coopchennick :
Adblock+Chrome blocks more for me than Adblock+FirefoxNoscript+Firefox wins either way, however


There is no such thing as an ad "block" with chrome. The best it can ever do is ad "hide". Chrome simply lacks content policies to be able to implement proper "blocking" like Firefox's adblock.

HappyBB 05/24/2010 9:40 AM
Hide
-1+

That is why I do not join any of the mentioned social service websites.

Anonymous 05/24/2010 5:42 PM
Hide
-3+

everyone one of these stories has people coming out of the woodwork to boast how much better they are because they don't join these sites, well sorry, but as long as you're not a complete moron, these sites are fine and a good way to keep in contact with people. You don't want to join them thats fine, but really, it doesn't make you any better a person because you don't.

Dirtman73 05/24/2010 9:30 PM
Hide
-1+

Canguy78 :
everyone one of these stories has people coming out of the woodwork to boast how much better they are because they don't join these sites, well sorry, but as long as you're not a complete moron, these sites are fine and a good way to keep in contact with people. You don't want to join them thats fine, but really, it doesn't make you any better a person because you don't.



Not better, just smarter.