In Conclusion
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: 8, audio, player, earphones
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Isolation: Good Or Bad?
- 3. Testing And Evaluation Methods
- 4. Testing And Evaluation Methods, Continued
- 5. AKG K26P: Bass! But Too Much?
- 6. On The Graph And To The Ear
- 7. Koss PortaPro: Gramps Kicks Up A Fuss
- 8. On The Graph And To The Ear
- 9. Koss The Plug: Direct Injection
- 10. On The Graph And To The Ear
- 11. Sennheiser PX200: Quality You Can Count On
- 12. On The Graph And To The Ear
- 13. Sennheiser PXC250: Higher Quality, Lower Noise
- 14. On The Graph And To The Ear
- 15. Sennheiser MX500: Earbuds That Don't Hurt
- 16.
- 17. Sennheiser MX550: More Of The Same?
- 18. On The Graph And To The Ear
- 19. Sony MDR-EX71SL: Ow!
- 20. On The Graph And To The Ear
- 21. In Conclusion
21. In Conclusion

We owe it to you earphone users to end our review with a warning against the danger of hearing damage caused by listening at high volume levels. The US has regulations on noise exposure in the workplace, but not on audio-player output. Theoretically, in France, there is a regulatory limitation of 100 dB(A) on the maximum output of an audio player; other EU countries also have regulations, and a European-level regulation seems to be in the works (the last draft available dates from October 20, 2005).
Unfortunately, installing really effective protection on an audio player is very difficult. When the user changes from the original earphones to a model with much higher efficiency, the result can be volume levels that are much higher than what the device was designed to deliver. And of course, amplification of the volume is always possible - there are earphone amplifiers on the market that plug in between the player and the phones.
We should point out that the maximum recommended exposure to noise - or music, if that's what you prefer - is one hour per day at 94 dB(A) and only 15 min (per day!) at 100 dB(A). Damage to hearing can quickly become irreversible, so if being able to hear normally is important to you, lower the volume! And that goes double if you like intraaural phones. They're often very treacherous on this score, especially because as our testing shows, they often have strong resonances in the high frequencies. And that's the most dangerous area.
That said, after our marathon of testing and listening, a few models clearly stand out. Our two favorites, taking all types of models together, are the Sennheiser PXC250 and the Koss PortaPro. While very different technically - one is a closed-back model with noise reducer, the other a standard semi-open model - they're both capable of top performance, though one or the other may be better suited to your tastes and the way you listen.
Other models, naturally, are capable of very good performance. If you're looking for a model that's both very affordable and very small, you have a choice between an intraaural like Koss's The Plug and an earbud model like the Sennheiser MX500. Here again, they're very different, and in practical terms it's a matter of taste and circumstances. We should make it clear, though, that this type of earphone can't come close to our two stars for pure listening.
Best prices for tested products
- Previous page On The Graph And To The Ear





Hi .. here is a belated 2007 comment on the Sennheiser PX 200. It arrives now as I just received a non-returnable pair for Xmas to use with my iPod Touch.
I have never used headphones much.. but .. your review seems to me to be dead on. I know that there are better phones (e.g. the Grado SR 60/80 at al). However, as I "check the sliders" on the iPod EQ -- they seem to fill the mid-range hole that you have reported.
On close, they are pretty good -- but their closed design just cuts the kind of live ambience that you can get with a non-closed design like the Grado's.
The bass PUNCHES too -- just listen to The Eagles - Hotel California.