IIt’s already looking like 2026 could be the year Meta AI finally levels up. According to The Wall Street Journal, Meta is in the process of acquiring Manus, an AI startup best known for building autonomous, “agentic” systems. Manus is an AI in a league of its own because it can take action and delivers finished work with minimal back-and-forth chatting.
On the surface, this acquisition looks like another big-ticket AI deal in an already crowded space. But for everyday users, it could quietly change how Meta AI works across Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and whatever comes next.
Manus isn’t another chatbot
There's a very good chance you may have not heard of Manus. It's not one of the more common chatbots like ChatGPT, Gemini or Claude. It surfaced about a year ago as competition to Deepseek and has been quietly building traction.
But while most people are used to AI as a conversational tool, Manus stands out as an autonomous worker. Instead of responding step by step, agentic systems are designed to:
- Break a goal into tasks
- Decide what tools or information are needed
- Execute those steps on your behalf
- Deliver a completed result
Think less “help me write an outline” and more “research this topic, draft a summary, pull sources and format it for me.”
If Meta integrates that kind of capability into Meta AI, it moves the assistant from being reactive to proactive, which is a meaningfut shift towards the future of AI.
What this could mean for Meta AI users
If you use Meta AI today, you’ve probably noticed it’s helpful but limited. It answers questions, generates images and assists with basic tasks, but it still feels like a chatbot.
Agentic AI could change that in a few key ways:
- Fewer prompts, more outcomes. Instead of carefully engineering prompts, you could give Meta AI a single goal — planning a trip, organizing an event, summarizing messages — and let it handle the steps.
- AI that works across apps. Meta controls messaging, social feeds and content creation tools. An agentic AI could realistically move between them — pulling context from chats, drafting posts or organizing information automatically.
- Less “AI babysitting." Right now, AI often needs constant correction. Agent-style systems are designed to self-correct mid-task, which could make them feel more reliable and less exhausting to use.
For consumers, this is the difference between talking to AI and delegating to it.
Why Meta would want this now
Meta has been vocal about its AI ambitions, but it’s also playing catch-up in some areas. With Google's Gemini 3.0 currently at the top of the leaderboards, the purchase of Manus could instantly accelerate Meta’s push forward.
Agentic AI is a space where companies like OpenAI and Google are already investing heavily. Instead of building everything in-house, Meta would be buying a team and a system already designed around autonomous execution.
It’s also a signal that Meta isn’t just focused on flashy AI features — it’s aiming for utility. And utility is what actually keeps people using AI tools long-term.
Bottom line
For users, the real story won’t be the acquisition itself — it’ll be what ships. WIthin the upcoming months, I’ll be watching how Meta integrates agentic features directly into Meta AI, or keeps them separate. I'll also be curious to see if this shows up first in productivity-style tools, or consumer apps like WhatsApp and Instagram. And perhaps most importantly, how much autonomy will users actually trust AI with?
This deal reinforces a clear trend: AI is moving beyond conversation and toward action.
For everyday users, that could mean fewer prompts, less micromanagement and AI that finally feels like a true assistant. Whether Meta can deliver on that promise is the question — and one we’ll be watching closely.
Follow Tom's Guide on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds.
More from Tom's Guide
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.
