Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: hd, camcorder | Themes: Digital Cameras, Digital Entertainment
- 1. Four HD Camcorders Tested
- 2. Camcorders: Handling
- 3. Canon: Full Options
- 4. Panasonic HDC SD5: First Impressions
- 5. Hitachi Blu-ray: Warning! Keep Back
- 6. Sony: Simple but Effective
- 7. Color Rendering
4. Panasonic HDC SD5: First Impressions
The Panasonic has great ergonomics. It fits the hand easily and comfortably, and the control panel for the menus is located on the rear of the camcorder, which is very handy because it lets you operate most of the controls with one hand. We also like the non-slip handgrip.
The display is high in quality, but we did note that the image was a little colder than on the Canon. The Panasonic delivers beautiful images, but they’re a bit lacking in intensity. The white-balance control comes in very handy here, letting you make corrections when the sensor is a little off in automatic mode. Video can be recorded in high definition only, so you have to use 16:9 format, and recording in MPEG2 format is impossible.
While the layout of the buttons may seem a bit odd at first, operation quickly becomes intuitive, and navigation in the menus is very easy. Auto/Manual/Focus buttons give you quick access to the main functions. Focusing can also be done using a small zoom, but it’s a bit finicky. In Auto mode, focusing is less reactive than on the Canon. The image stabilizer works very well and ensures a stable picture even with the optical zoom (10X) at its maximum.
There are five modes in addition to Automatic (Sports, Portrait, etc.) The Nightshot function is just plain unusable, generating only one image per second. It’s more of a gimmick than anything else. All told, the functions and options are more limited than on the Canon, but the Panasonic still holds its own.
- Previous page Canon: Full Options
- Next page Hitachi Blu-ray: Warning! Keep Back


Be aware that there are some poorly-advertised issues with at least some of these cameras.
It is common practice for cameras with full 1920x1080 sensors to scale the images to 1440x1080 before compression.
Also, camcorders that record progressive frames at 24pf tend to store their data as if it were 60i (60 fields/sec, interlaced) by duplicating and reordering parts of the video data. Most applications (Ulead Video Studio, Sony Vegas, etc.) believe the video files when they say they're 60i, so they try to interpolate between shifted and reordered fields in a process called deinterlacing. This results in smoother images that are not as sharp as they could be and ghosting of fast-moving objects. Camcorders that record to 30pf or 30p should not have this problem.
Also, as mentioned in the article, it currently takes some special applications (like Video Studio or Vegas) and/or a bit of technical know-how to even be able to read the M2TS files many of these camcorders produce.
HD Camcorders are in their infancy at the consumer level. Expect lots of changes quickly right now. Even Pro HD cameras are changing quickly right now.
The Tomshardware image with the Bug:
http://media.bestofmicro.com/0/P/9 [...] nglish.jpg
More about Chroma Sampling Bug:
http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/vol [...] -2001.html