Google Remotely Deletes Apps on Android Phones

In 2008, a hacker discovered that Apple could remotely uninstall apps from iPhones after they'd been paid for and installed. Just last year, Amazon remotely removed copies of 1984 from customers' Kindles. It raised eyebrows when we found out Apple could do it and it caused uproar when Amazon actually did it (without saying anything to paying customers). So how will people feel now that it's Google?

Google today announced that it has remotely removed two Android applications from users' phones. The applications in question were developed by a security researcher for research purposes and Google says they intentionally misrepresented their purpose in order to encourage user downloads. The apps were never designed to be used maliciously, and did not have permission to access private data — or system resources beyond permission.INTERNET. In fact, Google said the apps were pretty useless, and most people uninstalled it soon after the downloaded it, anyway.

The developer responsible for the applications is said to have voluntarily removed the apps from the Android Market Place, but Google made the decision to remotely remove the applications from users' phones "to complete the clean up."

Android Security Lead, Rich Cannings, said the remote application removal tool is a security measure to protect against malicious applications and while they, "hope to not have to use it," they know they can take swift action on behalf of their users' safety if they need to.

"This remote removal functionality — along with Android’s unique Application Sandbox and Permissions model, Over-The-Air update system, centralized Market, developer registrations, user-submitted ratings, and application flagging — provides a powerful security advantage to help protect Android users in our open environment," Cannings finished.

Check out his full post on the Android Developers Blog.

About the author
This thread is closed for comments
52 comments
    Top Comments
  • "In fact, Google said the apps were pretty useless, and most people uninstalled it soon after the downloaded it, anyway."

    It's not about apps being useless it's about not removing anything from a user's phone without consent. Key word here being consent which any company should learn to ask.
    29
  • borisof007What I'm trying to say I guess is do you have to make your garbage man ask you first before he takes your garbage can?

    No but if the garbage man came into my house without permission and took my garbage I'd be pretty pissed. This is what Google is doing and it is wrong regardless of the app.
    28
  • I fail... I just re-read the article. Shame on me for skimming it!
    malekith2k5No but if the garbage man came into my house without permission and took my garbage I'd be pretty pissed.
    +1

    I am against remote-uninstallation of any kind. If I downloaded the app, it's because I WANTED IT. If it's not what I expected, I WILL DELETE IT ON MY OWN. KTHXBAI.
    19
  • Other Comments
  • So that's what happened to my OTA froyo update? :-)
    0
  • "In fact, Google said the apps were pretty useless, and most people uninstalled it soon after the downloaded it, anyway."

    It's not about apps being useless it's about not removing anything from a user's phone without consent. Key word here being consent which any company should learn to ask.
    29
  • wow-thats a mean thing to do. especially to paying customers
    15