Buyer Beware: Baby Wearables Could Be Harmful
Doctors and government health regulators warn that wearable baby monitors could do more harm than good.
Here at Tom’s Guide our expert editors are committed to bringing you the best news, reviews and guides to help you stay informed and ahead of the curve!
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Daily (Mon-Sun)
Tom's Guide Daily
Sign up to get the latest updates on all of your favorite content! From cutting-edge tech news and the hottest streaming buzz to unbeatable deals on the best products and in-depth reviews, we’ve got you covered.
Weekly on Thursday
Tom's AI Guide
Be AI savvy with your weekly newsletter summing up all the biggest AI news you need to know. Plus, analysis from our AI editor and tips on how to use the latest AI tools!
Weekly on Friday
Tom's iGuide
Unlock the vast world of Apple news straight to your inbox. With coverage on everything from exciting product launches to essential software updates, this is your go-to source for the latest updates on all the best Apple content.
Weekly on Monday
Tom's Streaming Guide
Our weekly newsletter is expertly crafted to immerse you in the world of streaming. Stay updated on the latest releases and our top recommendations across your favorite streaming platforms.
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
Wearable baby monitors, the kind worn on clothes to keep track of an infant's breathing, heart rate, oxygen levels and other vital signs, are coming under increased scrutiny on concerns that they could actually do more harm than good.
There's no actual evidence that these devices save lives, and in fact, they could actually be harmful, lulling parents into a false sense of security since their accuracy and safety haven't been adequately proven, according to the Journal of the American Medical Association.
MORE: Best Smart Home Tech - Systems, Gadgets, Devices
Manufacturers of the devices, like the Owlet Baby Care, which JAMA uses as an example, aim to provide reassurance to worried parents that their child is safe, asleep in their cribs. But these companies have avoided official judgment by government health regulators, because they don't claim to actually prevent infant health issues and sudden infant death syndrome.
For parents who are considering these devices in the future, it may soon be harder to get them. The Food and Drug Administration has said that it intends to regulate any devices and apps that could pose a risk to users if they fail to work as they're meant to. To get a nod from the FDA, which regulates medical devices like pacemakers, these companies will have to go through a research and approval process.
The American Academy of Pediatrics has already advised that parents do not use devices at home that monitor an infant's heart rate and breathing, JAMA authors note.
- Best Baby Monitor - Night Vision Video and Monitoring
- Mattel's New Aristotle Could be the Perfect Smart Home Device
- Hyundai's Robotic Exoskeleton Lets Paraplegics Walk Again
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Althea Chang is Associate Director of Content Development for Consumer Reports and was previously a Senior Writer for Tom's Guide, covering mobile devices, health and fitness gadgets and car tech.
