Download the
Tom's Guide App from the AppsStore
News and trends on internet
/ mobile / "sound & picture" / IT
Yes No
Ads

Camera Buying Guide 2010

- by

10. SLR Transition: $600 to $1,000

Trying to tackle the SLR segment here is futile. We would need a whole article just to scratch the surface. So consider this a peek into the much larger world of SLR shooting. There are many less expensive options,  such as the Rebel XS kit ($549.99), which starts Canon’s SLR family. But for those wanting the latest features and capabilities at a sub-$1,000 price point, we’re very fond of the Canon Rebel T2i kit with its 18 mm to 55 mm lens ($899.99).

With the T2i, Canon jumps to an 18.0 MP sensor, which should be enough pixels to satisfy even the hungriest consumer prone to turning his or her pictures into posters. Having a through-the-lens viewfinder eliminates the parallax problems you sometimes encounter when shooting close-range subjects with cheaper cameras because the lens and the viewfinder aren’t centered at the same point. The T2i uses the DIGIC 4 processor, supports RAW, spans up to ISO 6400, has a 63-zone metering system, can track subjects to maintain focus on them, and can shoot up to 3.7 FPS.

 

As Canon’s flagship Rebel, there are simply too many features here to describe. Having a self-cleaning sensor is a great perk, but even better is having a live-view capability. This is the ability to see your shot in real-time, before taking the picture, as it would appear when recorded. With live view, you can see the final depth of field, exposure, and so on. It’s a tremendous time saver when you’re using manual settings. We wish Canon would implement live view a bit lower down its price scale, as in the PowerShot G-series, but you can’t have everything.

Also key with the T2i is the ability to shoot 1080p video with manual exposure control and interchangeable lenses. The camera can also do 720p at 60 FPS and will take an external microphone input. This is a very significant advance, because the CMOS sensor in the T2i is larger and better than the sensors used in most entry- and mid-level camcorders. For the first time, SLRs are now able to replace camcorders and deliver superior results.

Alternatives

The Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2 ($799) is a recent member of the Micro Four Thirds camera category promoted by Olympus and Panasonic. Four Thirds and Micro Four Thirds are not open standards, but supporters still hope to attract a broad range of interchangeable lens options. The advantage of Micro Four Thirds is having a much larger sensor compared to compact cameras, although the sensor is still smaller than APS-style sensors used in SLRs. In terms of form factor, Micro Four Thirds aims right between ultra-compacts and SLRs. Panasonic’s G2 is a 12.1 MP unit with a 14 mm to 42 mm optical IS lens. It’s a good unit with many SLR features, but at this price we’d probably shoot for a T2i body ($799) and a used lens or two.

Honestly, at $600 and up, the sky is the limit. Unless you’re a professional or semi-pro, odds are that you need to worry less about increasing megapixel counts and more about image quality. Definitely investigate Nikon as a counterpoint to Canon in this range, as many users swear allegiance to Nikon’s D-series. The D5000 in particular makes a great entry point into Nikon’s SLR field.

 

Whatever camera you pick, just do us one favor by learning it. So many people have no idea of what their cameras can truly accomplish. We hope you’ve seen in these pages some idea of what sorts of quality and functionality you can expect as you pay up the price scale. But even at the low-end, cameras can do so much more than simply shoot in auto mode. Explore. Experiment. With an extra five seconds of preparation, you can turn an ordinary scene into a work of art.

Share:
16
Comments
X

Comment:

Read the comments on the forums
rohitbaran 08/06/2010 10:19 PM
Hide
-3+

What? No alternatives in any of the first 5 price ranges? Is this a Canon sponsored review? :mmmfff:

kipsus 08/07/2010 8:24 AM
Hide
-2+

This ain't no "camera guide".. Lame

zodiacfml 08/07/2010 3:52 PM
Hide
-1+

it's just Canon lent them cameras for review, yet, I see alternative cameras for each range though.
TG, what about a buying guide for users upgrading their cameras for better image quality and performance, specifically, Micro Four Thirds.
I've seen many newbies with heavy and bulky SLR's and can't take advantage of it and thought they just want better images.

Anonymous 08/08/2010 3:17 PM
Hide
-1+

Oh come on, this is waaaaaay obviously Canon sponsored...

Anonymous 08/08/2010 5:57 PM
Hide
-1+

Tomshardware just lost all their credibility

Anonymous 08/09/2010 1:04 PM
Hide
-1+

Nikon D50?
Lol, that camera was launched more than 5 years ago, and is now discontinued for years.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D50

please retain from publishing such articles in the future, or do your homework first.

Tomsguiderachel 08/09/2010 8:02 PM
Hide
--1+

rohitbaran :
What? No alternatives in any of the first 5 price ranges? Is this a Canon sponsored review?


This is not a Canon sponsored review. We did have access to Canon products to help us get define what we see as the different categories of non-Pro cameras. Why do you not see the alternatives for the first five price ranges. We've discussed alternatives for each price range (each price range gets two pages so make sure you look at the second page of each).

Thanks for reading,

Rachel Rosmarin
Editor, Tom's Guide

Tomsguiderachel 08/09/2010 8:05 PM
Hide
-0+

sholky :
Oh come on, this is waaaaaay obviously Canon sponsored...


Nope, it isn't. Here's exactly what happened. Remember we posted an article recently about how-to for nature photography? Here it is. Well, the writer had access to a lot of different Canon models during that trip. So we figured he should use that refresh--that hands-on time--to our readers' advantage by discussing the breakdown of point and shoot and non-pro cameras in a guide. Canon's lineup was fresh in our minds but we also wanted to make sure we discussed other brands, so we sought out what we consider to be the best options.

Please stop saying we were bought out--we will always be transparent about our coverage.

Thanks for reading,
Rachel Rosmarin
Editor, Tom's Guide

Tomsguiderachel 08/09/2010 8:07 PM
Hide
-0+

CanonBiasedReviews :
Tomshardware just lost all their credibility


Reconsider your position after reading the other comments on this page. If you still think this article is biased, you're entitled to your opinion.

williamvw 08/09/2010 8:51 PM
Hide
-1+

Bored Reader :
Nikon D50?Lol, that camera was launched more than 5 years ago, and is now discontinued for years.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D50please retain from publishing such articles in the future, or do your homework first.


My apologies. I meant to include the Nikon D5000, not the D50. It was a slip-up on my part. The D5000 without lens sits in that $600+ range and makes for a great starter DSLR.

To second Rachel's feedback here, I can assure you my choice to focus on Canon here was done solely for simplicity and expediency. In fact, it was Rachel who insisted that we have the inclusion of other vendors in those "alternatives" sections in order to be fair and more helpful to readers. I know that it can be fun and somehow gratifying to overreact and fly off with accusations about Tom's Guide being bought. In no way is that true, and we all know that such practices would only come back to harm us later. When content is advertorial, we say so. This article looked to educate readers new to the subject, and a single-vendor approach seemed the most effective way for following feature additions up a product stack...nothing more.

rhys_cathym 08/09/2010 9:54 PM
Hide
-0+

I agree, this buying guide was not very in-depth at all. It seems that it is merely a Canon review guide with a couple superficial additions at each price range.

A proper buying guide would at least offer some comprehensive comparisons, perhaps with side-by-side images shot with different cameras. If Tom's Hardware is going to throw a recommendation for purchase without a detailed comparison, then this site's "Recommended Buys" just lost a lot of weight with me.

Tomsguiderachel 08/09/2010 10:31 PM
Hide
-0+

rhys_cathym :
I agree, this buying guide was not very in-depth at all. It seems that it is merely a Canon review guide with a couple superficial additions at each price range.A proper buying guide would at least offer some comprehensive comparisons, perhaps with side-by-side images shot with different cameras. If Tom's Hardware is going to throw a recommendation for purchase without a detailed comparison, then this site's "Recommended Buys" just lost a lot of weight with me.


Rhys--this was not a side-by-side comparison of models, it was a guide to the camera categories and what you can expect from each one. That said, what do you mean by "recommended buys"?

nikrusty 08/14/2010 9:01 AM
Hide
-0+

Hey Toms rocks and I'm glad to see rachel answering questions. I would recommend to add the titbit in the comment about the cameraman's having access to diff models thingy included in the article itself. Well it may not prevent idiots from saying you sold out but atleast we know where you are coming from.

nikrusty 08/14/2010 9:04 AM
Hide
-0+

Oh and I think the title is NOT suited to the article. though I myself cannot think of a better title, but you know the title seems a lot more traditional (as in readers would expect more brands, more choices) than what the article offers. It's a good read, unsuitable title though, therefore all this nonsense about SOLD OUT!

nikrusty 08/14/2010 9:11 AM
Hide
-0+

I thought of an interesting title "Our Experiences with Canon Cameras". It certainly intrigues me as to what Toms has to say about Canon and it moves away from the unnecessary "Buying guide format mindset" of not only the writer but the reader too. Don't forget us humans pighole ourselves way too much in our thinking.

This would've helped even the writer from unnecessarily shoving in products that he didn't know too much about (atleast not as well as Canon's).

Being a tech editor myself, I know the balancing issues and title mindset appropriateness. But good job nonetheless :)