You don't need an expensive gaming laptop to play AAA games — Dragon Age: The Veilguard proves it

HP Victus 15
(Image credit: Future)

Everyone loves a good bargain, but when it comes to cheap gaming laptops, things get rather complicated. And that comes down to the big question you usually ask: “does this run the games I want to play?”

It’s such a vague question, right? And it’s one with a very open answer, which leads to people burning a gigantic hole in their bank account for a top tier RTX 40-series monster — out of fear of not being able to play the latest AAA titles.

Well, as someone who has tested the best gaming laptops for the better part of six years, I’m going to do something a little different. Because while it’s obvious that the more money you spend, the more power you’ll get, there are some serious diminishing returns for doing so. Personally, I believe that:

  • You can get a great PC gaming experience out of even the cheapest of gaming laptops — provided you know what to do to find it.
  • The most expensive gaming laptops are somewhat pointless now, and that’s because of Nvidia’s DLSS — AI frame generation technology that can drastically increase the frame rate of any game and boost the detail without requiring a lot of GPU horsepower (currently, AMD’s version named FSR is playing catch-up to this).

To prove these, I’ve picked up an HP Victus 15 with 13th Intel Core i5, RTX 4050 and 16GB of RAM and I’ll try to get the latest AAA games working on it. First up, Dragon Age: The Veilguard.

HP Victus 15 (RTX 4050)
HP Victus 15 (RTX 4050): was $1,099 now $499 at Walmart

Right now, you can get $600 off the laptop I used for this test! Inside, you get an Intel Core i5-13420H CPU, RTX 4050, 16GB of DDR4 RAM and a 512GB SSD.

HP Victus 15 (RTX 4050)
HP Victus 15 (RTX 4050): was £949 now £799 at very.co.uk

Heading over to the UK, and you can get a slightly more powerful spec with the AMD Ryzen 5 chipset for £150 off.

What are the rules?

What is a great PC gaming experience? That is such a wide-open question, as some people will be just fine scraping by with every detail setting turned on and a frame rate barely pushing 30 FPS, whereas others in the PC master race will settle for nothing less than 120 FPS.

But for test results, we do need to put targets in. Here’s what I’ll try to hit:

  • A rock solid 60 FPS minimum with a 1080p resolution.
  • Good graphical fidelity — this is definitely more qualitative, but something I’ll prove in screenshots.

Dragon Age doesn’t drag

Dragon Age: The Veilguard

(Image credit: Bioware)

So at first, for a laugh, I tried every setting turned up to ultra with DLSS activated. The results were, well, bad. Surprisingly I managed to get 20 FPS, but with a lot of rubber banding and stuttering as the VRAM of the GPU was completely consumed.

And then, after getting that silliness out of my system, I got to work with the settings. By the way, Bioware, can you update the game so I don't have to restart it every time I change a setting? Really frustrating!

Anyway, with the mix you see above, I managed to get a good-looking game (the studio's put a lot of effort into the atmosphere here) running at 60 FPS-ish. There were some dips, but nothing overtly noticeable.

Dragon Age: The Veilguard

(Image credit: Bioware)

And the magic of DLSS (in balanced mode) was on full show. I remember seeing this new tech in its first iteration and laughing it off for all the odd ghosting and fuzziness that came with it. Now, the picture is razor sharp and this game is fully playable on a gaming laptop that's almost as cheap as a console.

Outlook

I’ll continue to come back to this incredibly cheap HP Victus 15 for as many big game launches as I can get my hands on. But as you can tell from my time with Dragon Age, it’s time for people to not be scared of seeing the words “RTX 4050” on a spec sheet.

There are certain circumstances where more power is necessary. For example, if super competitive online play is important, the tiny amounts of latency caused by frame generation will impact your ability to perform lightning quick reactions.

But for the vast majority of you, I can assure you that this base GPU and what it can do is going to be enough.

More from Tom's Guide

Category
Arrow
Arrow
Back to Gaming Laptops
Brand
Arrow
Processor
Arrow
RAM
Arrow
Storage Size
Arrow
Screen Size
Arrow
Colour
Arrow
Condition
Arrow
Price
Arrow
Any Price
Showing 10 of 20 deals
Filters
Arrow
Load more deals
Jason England
Managing Editor — Computing

Jason brings a decade of tech and gaming journalism experience to his role as a Managing Editor of Computing at Tom's Guide. He has previously written for Laptop Mag, Tom's Hardware, Kotaku, Stuff and BBC Science Focus. In his spare time, you'll find Jason looking for good dogs to pet or thinking about eating pizza if he isn't already.

  • Deivo
    Got to to level 24 and just had to drop it out of sheer boredom. A band of scheming genies armed with monkey paws couldn't have possibly outdone Ubisoft.
    I don't recall a single game that ran this well. Shame that it's all that it had going for it. Hopefully they'll utilize this talent in many games to come

    Back on topic, the 4050 just looks abysmal. Barely outperforms my ancient GTX 1070 and somehow it's in multiple $1,5k+ laptops. At that point why even bother? Might as well market a GPU-less laptop as fit for gaming. Seems a tad disingenuous to paint racing stripes on a volkswagen Polo and to call it a race car

    I'd be surprised if the 4050 would manage to reach a stable 60 fps in any other triple A game.
    Reply