Roundup: Scanners : Pandigital Photolink One-Touch Scanner

By Digital Versus, published on September 10, 2009
Powered by Digital Versus

4. Pandigital Photolink One-Touch Scanner

Perfect for your digital photo frame

This scanner includes a card reader which allows you to save your scans directly onto a supported memory card (SD/CF/MC/MMC/xD).

That means you don't have to turn on your computer, just insert a card and you can quickly and easily start saving images onto it. It's a perfect way of getting printed photos onto your digital photo frame.

If, however, you need to archive your photos on your computer with accurate results, then you'll do better with a flatbed scanner.

The Pandigital Photolink One-Touch Scanner is the perfect companion to a digital photo frame.  Without switching on your computer, it allows you to automatically copy printed photos onto a memory card which you can then slide into your digital frame.

It takes up very little room on your desk but is very easy to use.  We think it's a great idea for those who sometimes struggle with technology: you can go straight from a traditional paper album to a digital photo frame without anything in between very quickly.  It's also very small: At just a tenth of the length of the Epson V30 and 25 times less voluminous, the One-Touch Scan doesn't make its presence felt.

As its name suggests, it's very simple to use, with just one button needed to start scanning.  All you have to do first is slide the photo you want to digitie into a the plastic folder that's supplied before running it through the scanner.

Speed

Scanning a photo at 300 dpi then takes just 9 seconds, which is a good result.  Like this model, most flatbed scanners do this task in around 10 seconds.

Quality

Original

What to look out for:
Orange tones that are hard to reproduce, details in the hair, skin tones.

Scanner

A lot of details have disappeared.  The wood looks reddish-orange, and the face is pale, although the cheeks still look red.  There are no longer any details in the hair.

There is a significant loss of quality, much more so than with a flatbed scanner, whether or not it's part of a multifunction printer.  But is that a problem?  Well, if you're looking to archive your photos on your computer, then yes.  If you have stacks of prints that you want to digitize and keep forever, then other scanners will do a better job.  If, on the other hand, you just want to include a few older snaps on your digital photo frame, then go for it--there's no point in pretending that their screens are good enough quality for these defects to be visible anyways.

Indeed, the screens on most digital photo frames are awful.  Poorly configured with narrow viewing angles and low contrast ratios, it won't be the detail that this scanner wipes out that will cause problems.  Given that it makes almost all colors lighter than they should be, it might even improve the brightness.

Despite being an entry-level scanner, the One-Touch still went through our full set of tests:  On the top row are the colors it produced, while on the bottom are the ideal colors that were on the original test card.

The lack of contrast and brightness is very obvious: the black is no longer black, the red becomes orange, as does the yellow, the blue becomes purple and so on.

When it's converted into numbers, the average discrepancy is about 11%. By comparison, most flatbed scanners are closer to 6%.  

This scanner is an interesting concept, but the next model will need to improve its color handling.  We're looking forward to it!

In the meantime, though, our score might seem a little harsh.  If the test was entirely 'scanning photos to display on a digital photo frame', then this product would climb to three--or even four--stars, especially while the display quality on photo frames doesn't seem to be improving.  However, the manufacturer claims that this is a product that can be used for archiving photos on a computer, and that's just not the case: it's too basic for that.

Pandigital Photolink One-Touch Scanner
ProsCons
  • No computer of software required
  • Very small
  • Fast scanning
  • Easy to use
  • Stores scans on a memory card
  • Poor color handling
  • Loss of detail

The One-Touch Scanner has a good ideas at its heart: making scanning easy. It's perfect for adding snaps to your digital photo frame, but it won't do for archiving prints on your computer as the quality just isn't good enough.


Comments | Print | Send to a friend

Sponsored links

Comments

major7up 09/11/2009 5:35 AM
Hide
-0+

When will we get the reviews of the pro scanners?

thackstonns 09/11/2009 4:33 PM
Hide
-0+

well thats kinda crap you say one of the entry level does better than the pro's, but then you dont mention which one. Is it not in this part of the review? And if not why?

butaze 09/14/2009 9:12 AM
Hide
-0+

We wanted to test a second unit of this pro scanner. We've done it yet. Same results. It's the Epson V500 Photo.

TwoDigital 09/14/2009 6:04 PM
Hide
-0+

Butaze - I'll assume above you meant "We HAVEN'T done it yet"? I'm interested to see how these scanners match up against the higher-end photoscanners... I've had the top-model Canoscan (not the entry 700f you review) that I've been pretty happy with though it's getting older and probably due for a refresh.

Sponsored links