Lame Browser, Killer Camera

By Rachel Rosmarin, published on December 4, 2008
Source: Tom's Guide | Keywords: , , | Themes: Smartphones

2. Lame Browser, Killer Camera

Maybe he’s the kind of guy who thinks a “real” smart phone would be too much for him to handle: the Behold doesn’t seem to be able to a do the POP or IMAP standards on its mail program, and the WAP-based Web browser doesn’t load full HTML pages. That makes all the juicy 3G signal seem like a bit of a waste on this handset. There’s also no Wi-Fi on the phone, but with a browser that’s less than fun to use, what good would Wi-Fi be? I suppose these shortcomings could be a draw to someone wary of true Internet and e-mail access on a phone. The G1 might seem intimidating to this guy, while the Behold might be just his speed. It’s a quasi-smart phone.

The Behold does have a killer camera. At five megapixels, with a flash and the ability to focus, choose resolution, correct color and contrast or add effects, it stands out above just about every other camera phone on the market. But, let’s be frank—it’s slow to shoot (about three seconds for every picture), and, well, you see some of the pictures taken by the Behold below. Sure, they’re decent (and far better than most camera phone images), but still can’t come near the quality of your point-and-shoot Canon PowerShot. The person who buys the Behold will convince himself that his cam-phone shots will be stunning (they won’t be). Even so, the camera does capture Youtube-quality video—and that’s more than you can say for the iPhone (no video at all).

The Behold-buyer won’t fancy himself a touch-screen aficionado. If he did, he’d obviously prefer the iPhone, with its multi-touch capabilities. He’s not a keyboard nut either, or he’d choose the G1 (which has a touch screen and a keyboard), or a Blackberry (no smart phone can compete when it comes to watching the speed with which a Blackberry-lover bangs out an e-mail message). That said, the Behold’s screen offers a few nice touches. There’s tactile feedback, for one. That means when an on-screen button is clicked, the phone not only creates a visual representation of the click (the iPhone does this), but gives off a little buzz at the point of finger contact with the screen. It is reassuring, and let’s you know you’ve made something happen.

There’s also Samsung’s TouchWiz interface which sits on top of the bloated and buggy Windows Mobile. Its an improvement over Windows Mobile, and allows for a widgetized “desktop” on the phone screen (you can drag and drop “apps” like a gallery of your photos, or your “fave five” onto the home screen. Cute.). Also, the screen rotates to wide-screen QWERTY keyboard during browsing and e-mailing. Finally, the touch-keyboard lets you switch between full QWERTY and T9 predictive text. For the text-happy schoolboys and girls who buy this phone as an upgrade, and aren’t used to this whole full-keyboard concept, the familiar T9 will make them feel at home.

Comments | Print | Send to a friend

Sponsored links

Comments

nitrous9200 12/05/2008 2:09 AM
Hide
-0+

This handset doesn't have Windows Mobile, you even said that it's not a "real" smartphone. The Omnia is a smartphone, this is not.

Tomsguiderachel 12/05/2008 2:14 AM
Hide
-0+

Hey Nitrous,

Are you saying a phone has to have Windows Mobile to be considered a real smartphone in general?

Rachel Rosmarin, Editor, Tom's Guide

Anonymous 12/05/2008 3:23 AM
Hide
-0+

cool

http://www.dpbolvw.net/click-3267951-10392042

use this code j0GcZFXb77XHY

Claimintru 12/05/2008 9:07 AM
Hide
-3+

This is a horribly written article from a journalistic standpoint. It's obviously heavily biased, the writing style does nothing but insult the product (Whether it deserves it or not), and the few positives about the product are written off as "it has this...buttttt.......".

Very unprofessional, hardly objective and if I got paid to write things like this I could slander just about any product up and down.

For the record I'm not saying the complaints about the phone are bad, by all means seeing pictures of where the SD card slot is makes me surprised, but they're just brought about poorly.

nitrous9200 12/05/2008 9:39 PM
Hide
-0+

Yes, actually I am. A dumbphone like this is not nearly as flexible or customizable as a smartphone with a real OS. Sure, you can get a Voyager and use email on it for example, but it's not going to be as good as a Windows Mobile phone, Blackberry or iPhone. Plus a real smartphone can run applications instead of just little apps from the Get it Now store for example. The "iPhone killer" dumbphones like the Voyager and Instinct look really useful on the outside, but aren't going to be quite as versatile.

Tomsguiderachel 12/06/2008 2:58 AM
Hide
-0+

Claimintru :
This is a horribly written article from a journalistic standpoint. It's obviously heavily biased, the writing style does nothing but insult the product (Whether it deserves it or not), and the few positives about the product are written off as "it has this...buttttt.......".Very unprofessional, hardly objective and if I got paid to write things like this I could slander just about any product up and down.For the record I'm not saying the complaints about the phone are bad, by all means seeing pictures of where the SD card slot is makes me surprised, but they're just brought about poorly.


Claimintru,
I appreciate that you noticed the different style of this article, even if you didn't like it. I experimented with a shorter review style, and used a more casual tone. I would argue that the article is not biased, since as a reviewer I look at many phones and offer my opinion on their merits. My objective with this review was to try to determine who would buy it (whose needs does it meet?). I came away thinking that there are not many people for whom this phone would be ideal. Also, I don't think it is technically possible to slander a cell phone :)

Thanks for reading,
Rachel Rosmarin, Editor of Tom's Guide

frozenlead 12/08/2008 3:52 AM
Hide
-0+

I've yet to see or use a phone that makes me want to trade in my XV6700.

Except maybe the XV6800. :)

Anonymous 12/24/2008 6:45 PM
Hide
-0+

first of all , this phone is for people switching from a regular cell phone to a better interface. second, t-mobile does not require you to join a 40$ a month data plan. you can simply get a regular plan and pay just phone charge and use the calander, music player, games etc...just no email and internet. (that's 2000$ of saving compare to iphone)..if you want the extra internet , you can get a $24 3G data plan...way cheaper than ATT and verizon.
the phone is small...it rings loud and call quality and reception is good. (unlike iphone...my reception is really bad)...it does well on it's primary function...a phone.
As for browser..yes, all samsung phones use the same crappy browser that slows down the 3G connetion. (I had samsung instinct on sprint and it's the same bad browser on a fast network...GPS downloads quick on that phone...so it's the browser problem).
however, you can download a third party browser to use on this phone...your experience will be much better...
screen is small ...not as good as iphone but you get a small phone to carry around.
my wife has this phone and after comparing with my iphone, I think it's as good as it get for this price range and without the killer
contract price with ATT or Verison.

Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links