DVDs Come Under Pressure From The-same-day ITunes Digital Releases

By Christian Zibreg, published on May 4, 2008 at 4:10 PM
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: , , | Themes: The Internet, Digital Entertainment
Syndication: Add to your Google homepage Add to My Yahoo!

 

Analysis - Movie rentals and purchases in iTunes Store are catching up with DVDs big time with today’s announcement that Apple’s online media store will offer new and library titles the same day as DVD releases. The fact that you’re now able to purchase a movie on iTunes the same day DVD hits the retail channels is a major milestone in the digital movies development. Wal-Mart isn’t going to like this at all...

Today’s announcement by Apple confirms yesterday’s article in the Hollywood Reporter claiming Apple has a deal in place with major Hollywood studios that would see movies at the iTunes Store available for rental or purchase the same day as on DVD, dropping altogether the 30-day window that had been separating digital from physical releases. According to Apple’s press release, both new releases and catalog titles will be available from 20th Century Fox, The Walt Disney Studios, Warner Bros., Paramount Pictures, Universal Studios Home Entertainment, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Lionsgate, Image Entertainment and First Look Studios. It’s interesting that MGM at this point isn’t part of the solution. On the other hand, the inclusion of Warner will significantly boost the iTunes catalogue since the studio owns the biggest movie library in Hollywood.

The deal comes just a few days after fifth anniversary of iTunes this Monday and is supported by a quiet update to the Apple TV version of the iTunes Store, now allowing movies to be purchased directly from the device. Recent Take 2 software update brought movie rentals but users still had to resort to PC or Mac to purchase the movie and sync it back to Apple TV. Now, it’s possible to purchase a movie from Apple TV and then sync it back to iTunes library on PC or Mac. The change doesn’t require software updates (it’s automatically applied to the storefront). Movies purchased from iTunes Store can be viewed on a Mac, PC, iPod, iPhone and Apple TV.

When iTunes started with movie sales in 2006, just a couple of studios joined in, led by the Disney conglomerate. Disney’s CEO Bob Iger said this March that his company had sold 4 million movies via iTunes. It should come as no surprise that Disney was the first studio to signup for iTunes’ download-to-own scheme because Apple and Disney have an executive relationship: besides being Apple’s CEO, Steve Jobs became the largest individual Disney shareholder when the entertainment conglomerate acquired Jobs’ animation studio Pixar. However, the majority of studios were absent from iTunes’video downloads, most notably Warner. In January, studios joined in to test movie rentals on iTunes. Today’s announcement not only removes the window of exclusivity for DVD but effectively brings all major studios to iTunes in both movie rentals and download-to-own schemes. This kind of commitment to iTunes puts greater pressure on competing services, most notably Microsoft’s Xbox Marketplace, Amazon’s Unbox, the Vudu set-top box and the upcoming box from Blockbuster.

A 30-day exclusivity windows had been the norm set by studios due to pressure from retail chains who are afraid of digital movies cannibalizing DVD sales. Studios make billions of dollars by selling DVDs to retail chains so it’s no wonder that Wal-Mart bended Hollywood to its will back in 2006, with a threat to significantly cut DVD orders if the studios continue to favor pricing of digital content over the physical (movies on iTunes cost up to $15 for the "near-DVD quality digital file). Wal-Mart’s influence over studios comes from the fact the retail giant is the largest wholesale buyer in Hollywood. Apple’s announcement proves the retail giant is loosing some of its negotiating power, signaling change to the balance of power and evident tidal shifts in digital movies market.

Movie downloads are already huge, with vast future growth potential. Market research group Screen Digest values movie downloads to $250M this year, predicting growth to $1.05B by 2012. Screen Digest also predicts that by 2012 digital rentals will overtake download-to-own model. Unlike music that people overwhelmingly buy to own, people find it more convenient to simply rent a digital movie for couple of bucks than to own the content that’s going to be viewed only once, anyway.

According to the Digital Entertainment Group survey, revenues from DVD sales and rentals in 2007 fell 3% compared to year ago. It was the first decline in DVD sales in a decade, another sign of changes in consumer behaviour. Hollywood made $23.7B this year from DVD sales and rentals, but revenues from sales were $600M lower then a year ago.

These figures show the movie sales and renting market being very lucrative. It’s no wonder many are interested to claim the market once it goes all digital. This may happen sooner than later, mimicking the way the digital music revolution took the music industry by surprise. As we can see from the data, the decline in DVD sales already begun and will probably escalate further, especially since online stores such as iTunes can now offer movie the same day it becomes available on DVD.

Movies and music already make a significant portion of Apple’s revenue. For example, Apple posted a $7.5B revenue in Q2, with $881M coming from sales of music, movies and iPod accessories. Apple’s movie business received a much needed boost in January when iTunes movie rentals were introduced and Take 2 software update for Apple TV. True, Apple TV still isn’t quite there and we may have a ’Take 3’ or 4 before Apple actually delivers its promise if "the DVD player for the 21st century." But the most important stimulant for digital movies can come only from within Hollywood.

We’re referring to restrictions that are a result of pressure from retail chains. Of course retail chains want to hinder digital sales in favor of DVDs, but this very effectively hampers wider acceptance of digital movies. NYT’s David Pogue describes in a funny video why it’s still far more convenient for consumers to grab a physical DVD, than to wait 30 days for a digital copy. We think the removal of the 30-day window is the first step, a very important one, in the right direction. But it won’t provide enough kinetic energy to get the snowball rolling. Instead, the viewing window has to be increased from 24 to at least 48 hours. It’s simply inconvenient to watch half of the movie today and not being able to finish it tomorrow because the movie expired. When both pre-requisites are met, you will get instant gratification (buy/watch the movie the minute it comes on a DVD) and a meaningful value proposition (rent it and watch in 48 hours).

Of course, studios in the meantime need to increase their digital catalogue vastly. MacWorld reported that Apple missed its self-imposed target of having thousands of movie rentals available by the end of February. The iTunes Store now has 1500 movies, 200 of which are HD. That’s still well bellow competing services claiming 5,000 movies (Vudu) and a drop in the ocean compared to 19000 titles that are out there on DVDs in the US alone. The iTunes’ catalog is mostly comprised of older library titles, with only the latest and greatest releases coming on digital services. Luckily, this problem will sort itself out. Catalogs will expand when the demand goes up and this will happen when Hollywood creates a fair proposition for customers.

People ridiculed Steve Jobs when he talked about the digital music revolution during the iPod introduction back in 2001. Now the same revolution is overtaking Hollywood, the video games industry, and even book publishing. Any kind of content that can be digitized and consumed on our computers or mobile phones will at some point in time be delivered mainly digitally, with movies obviously being next. With the removal of exclusivity period and backing it now enjoys from Hollywood studios, iTunes Store and Apple TV set-top box could soon become more than a "hobby business" for Apple.

Comments | Print | Send to a friend
Slideshows related to this news

Sponsored links

Comments

mikeynavy1976 05/05/2008 2:42 AM
Hide
-1+

This article is misleading. First, I don't know anyone right now using iTunes to download anything except music. Also, the only folks I know who would even consider this option are laptop users or computer geeks (not meant in a bad way) who have HTPCs hooked up to their big screen TVs. I know I'm not interested. My computer is in a separate room from my TV and I'm not going to upgrade my TV simply to be able to hook it up to my home theater system and have cables all over the place. As far as DVD sales...well in case people haven't noticed with the declining economy...everything is going to be lower than last year. How do they know it is due to digital downloads? Finally, if digital downloads pick up like this article is claiming, so will your Internet prices which will negate any savings you think you're getting. Just my $.02

dan350zr 05/05/2008 8:34 AM
Hide
-0+

I have to agree with mikey, There's no way I'm going to watch a "near quality" DVD on my 60" HDTV, the movie will look terrible.. I'll stick with normal up-scaled DVD's and Blu-ray's... Not to mention I can take my DVD and play it on any device, I'm sure apple will have lots of DRM restrictions...

Sandbags 05/05/2008 2:25 PM
Hide
-0+

MikeyNavy: First, Everyone I know uses iTunes not only for music, but also for (at least) TV shows. Not all subscribe to season passes, but even with a DVR, sometimes I miss an episode, or my wife deletes it before I see it, and I spend $1.99 to get a copy.

Next, you do not have to connect your PC to your HDTV to watch iTunes content. You can get 1) an Apple TV, which hooks up little differently than a DVD player and uses wireless or a wired connection back to your PC, 2) an iPod video, iPhone, or iPod Touch with a video dock connector can be plugged directly into your TV, and 3, some people who don't have HDTV, yet have HDTV or better computer screens feel completely confortable watching at their desks. (for a long time I have better picture quality and surround sound at my desk than I did in the living room). Your TV does not require an upgrade to watch iTunes content, in fact, it's not really in HD yet anyway (480i).

I can't really say the internet costs negate my downloading savings... I'm going to pay for internet anyway. You don't need a super fast connection (though I don't recomend the "lite" versions of DSL or Cable to dowload full movies).

DVD sales are partially dropping due to digital downloads, they're also dropping due to netflix and other unlimited movie rental options. Further they're declining because many people have been waiting for the Blu-Ray/HDDVD war to be over (and many got out of the habit of buying diring that time and have not started buying again, or they're further waiting for Blu-Ray to match DVD price per disk - I am)

The ONLY thing stopping me from downloading DVD through iTunes is DRM. If I can't make a copy onto a DVD disk, can't make it portable, loanable to family members, playable in multiple players in my house, and use the DVD as a backup to a computer crash, then for me, it's not worth the savings. If I can't have a physical copy, it's no use to me. TV shows and rentals I can handle. Watched once for $2-3, that's all I care about. For $15, I want a hard copy. It's why I still buy books at the store... With music, Apple has generous DRM rights, and lets me make several copies. Why not with TV and Movies??? Ask the studios!

Sandbags 05/05/2008 2:32 PM
Hide
-0+

Dan, please don't confuse "Apple's" DRM policies with those that the movie and TV studios are enforcing. Appple's DRM is the single most generous in the industry, allowing not just one, but multiple copies to be made, and for the originals to be used on up to 5 computers simultaneously. Unfortunately, with movie and video, Apple has been forced to lock down the content. All you can do is make backup copies of the files. You can not export iTunes video to DVD (except as a file backup). We expect this to be changing sometime in the future, but no word yet from apple or the rumor mills. A change would require contract adjustments. Once the first one breaks, the rest will all cave under pressure, but we have yet to crack the first one.

vherub 05/05/2008 4:44 PM
Hide
-0+

Perhaps the same day offering is less a reflection of retailers loosing power, and more that 250 million in yearly sales is less than 2% of the 23 billion yearly brought in by dvds.
Coca-cola isn't muscling out little kid's lemonade stands because they own minute maid- not too water down the comparison too much.

fazers_on_stun 05/05/2008 4:57 PM
Hide
-0+

Wonder if the studios make as much profit on downloads as they do on DVD sales? Obviously it is cheaper for them to license downloads. Personally I'd rather wait & see the DVD-quality on a Netflix rental - if the movie becomes one of my favorites, I may buy it or even shell out the bucks for a BD version.

fazers_on_stun 05/05/2008 5:25 PM
Hide
-0+

To Sandbags - about the only TV series I watch consistently is Lost. And if I miss an episode, I just point my laptop at abc.com and watch it in "near DVD" mode for free. Of course, abc extracts their price in the form of commercials, but those are fewer in number and shorter in length than the ones in the broadcast.

dan350zr 05/05/2008 11:24 PM
Hide
-0+

Regardless if its Apple's DRM restrictions or the movie industries, bottom line is movies d/led from these sites have unreasonable DRM restrictions.

I also wonder if this takes off, how long will it take ISP's to introduce tier pricing because of the bandwidth being used by people d/ling so many HD movies... Not sure it would be worth it if my Internet connection starts costing around $100 a month in order to get the bandwidth necessary to d/led them.

Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links