Picasa’s No Dog

By William Van Winkle, published on October 5, 2009
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: , , | Themes: Software

19. Picasa’s No Dog


All told, it took about one minute to exhaust all of the hits for my four subjects and amass 112 correct tags before Picasa ran out of suggestions. That part sounds great. Less encouraging is the realization that this only represents 23% of all faces identified during the initial scan. At this point, I highlighted Unnamed to bring up the remaining 373 faces. You can batch select Unnamed faces and collectively ignore them, but because Picasa can run as a local application, clicking the X symbol in the top-right of each face box to ignore goes away as quickly as batch selection. I found that as one Unnamed group is exhausted, another quickly comes up to replace it. Also, as you use the auto-fill menus to complete names for the people you want to tag, Picasa starts adding more suggestions to your recognized People albums. This can create a lot of back-and-forth between the Unnamed and recognized People albums, and you’ll just have to experiment with whether you’re willing to do this or just plough through the Unnamed faces from start to finish. I opted for the latter approach because I dislike feeling interrupted.

Unlike several competitors, Picasa didn’t generate a bunch of false tags by confusing objects for faces. I did get one hit on a dog’s face, but no inanimate objects, which is very encouraging. I also noticed that Picasa picked up faces often ignored by rival apps.

It took me 12 minutes to go from writing in the first name to finishing off the Unnamed collection. When done with this, I found I had the following accounted for: Me, 34 of 45; Devon 98 of 117); Garrett 80 of 93; and Knico, 34 of 43. That’s pretty good, but there were still a lot of missing faces. Not even Picasa gets you out of the auditing stage.

To start auditing, click on your folder, then double-click on the first image in the album. This brings up Picasa’s editor. If you mouse-over faces in the picture, you’ll see the usual tag box with a name under it. Along the right side of the UI, Picasa shows you the representative face thumbnails for the people tagged in the photo. I wish Picasa had used the actual faces shown in the photo as the thumbnails, but I can see arguments for doing it both ways. (For instance, it might be handy to have a current thumbnail of a person when you’re seeing his or her baby pictures.) Not immediately seeing the tag boxes on-screen means you have to pay a little more attention and match what you see in the full image against the thumbnails on the right. More thinking means more time.

The left and right arrows at the top of the editing module help you move through the album. When you find an image that’s missing a tag, use the Add a person manually button at the bottom of the People bar on the right to create a tag, resize it, drag it over your target’s face, then apply the name. From start to finish, auding/editing with Picasa took me 15 minutes.

Comments | Print | Send to a friend

Sponsored links

Comments

liemfukliang 10/06/2009 5:29 AM
Hide
--3+

Please update more on:
1. let just say I have spend weekly time on a low end pc to get 33 GB photo with so many file. How do I save this tag when I am reinstall windows?
2. About the portabilty in no 1. Picasa has picasa.ini in every folder, but when it corrupt, the picasa.ini is not helpful recovering the weekly time spent.
3. Speed? Why there is no benchmark graph like usual?
4. Try gradiation photos or something similiar. It will see about the acuration.
5. I want to get the best speed, what is the most needed hardware. If Processor will I7 better than C2D? If GPU, will Geforce GTX 295 better than 9800?

I have private paint experience using picasa. I have taging many face in a week of Sempron 2800+ OC to 2 Ghz. When the face recognation is done, for what ever reason, my cpu is dead (dead power electricity). When the electricity power is up, my pc is on windows. The picasa is corrupt. My one week OC is for nothing. DAMN :((.

deadlockedworld 10/06/2009 9:23 AM
Hide
-0+

I recently tagged all my photos with Picasa. I think i personally tagged more than the software did--the software is VERY cautious. It also repeatedly asked to tag posters, even paintings that were on my walls. Finally, it doesn't do well with babies--which is no surprise because they all look the same to me too :-)

Its cool, but im not sure the outcome was worth sitting there tagging hundreds of pictures of ex-girlfriends.

testerie 10/06/2009 11:37 AM
Hide
-0+

I am giving comment for testing.

Tomsguiderachel 10/06/2009 6:41 PM
Hide
-0+

Deadlockedworld--you don't have to tag everyone in every album in Picasa--just don't tag albums that have your exes in them. I definitely don't tag everyone in my photos--only those people that are important to me.

Anonymous 10/06/2009 8:48 PM
Hide
-0+

Adobe's Photoshop Elements 7 has the ability to detect faces but not automatically match them. It did make tagging much quicker. I could select 40 pictures from a party and tag the lot all at once.

However, I found that there were several pictures that it didn't catch. So, I ended up having to go through the whole bunch manually anyway to catch the stragglers. I found I spent as much time, if not more, making sure I got everything. So, I'm not sure that the "helpful tool" actually did much.

Anonymous 10/07/2009 11:29 AM
Hide
-0+

I am using iPhoto '09 and I found that the predictive tagging is getting less and less accurate as the database of tagged faces increases. Impression confirmed by one of my friends using the same app. For example, my wife is probably the most frequent face in my collection and the software has a hard time identifying her. On the other hand, I tagged the face of a friend I see rarely and I was welcomed with 4-5 good matches.

Sponsored links