Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: decibels, noise, canceling | Themes: Audio/Video Players
4. Protect Yourself
Pete Townsend, legendary guitarist of The Who, has publicly stated that he is practically deaf and is now vocal about cautioning people in their music listening habits. But he doesn’t blame his decades of high-volume rock concerts. The real culprit, he believes, are headphones. “My own particular kind of damage was caused by using earphones in the recording studio, not playing loud on stage,” he wrote late in 2005.
This makes sense if you think about it. Barring the handful of idiots who persist in standing right next to 12-foot tall speaker towers at outdoor concerts, banging their heads in time to the pulsing destruction between their ears, even the people on stage are still many feet from their speakers. With headphones, though, your ears are being bombarded at point blank range. Worse than that, air tends to filter high frequencies. With headphones, you’ve got the transducers only inches from the ear drums. There’s no chance for signal attenuation. The trend from headphones to earbuds or, even worse, in-canal earphones only exacerbates the problem. We love the detail and clarity of such devices, but it’s all too easy to abuse them. With over 200 million iPods sold, we are now living in a world where the capacity for hearing damage rests in practically every pocket—especially teens.
In a recent Boston Globe article titled “iHuh?” writer Patricia Wen notes: “Researchers say the sensory cells in our inner ear—which transmit sounds to our brains—can only take so much auditory bombardment before they begin to wilt, irreparably, and die. The damage teens suffer now may not show up until they're in their forties and asking friends in crowded restaurants, ‘Could you repeat that?’”
Joking aside, I’ve never actually thought I have hearing loss, but I do have a very hard time understanding people near me in even moderately loud settings. If I’m trying to hear my wife at a table when the kids are talking, I’m more or less lip reading.
Maximum iPod volume is about 105 decibels. However, there is a way to hack an iPod and unlock this limit. (No, I’m not going to tell you how. I’m supposed to be helping you here.) I would actually encourage you to lower the iPod’s limit. As of iTunes 6.0.5, you can manually set the maximum volume limit by going into Settings > Volume Limit, then setting the point you want as the maximum level (we recommend 75% to 80%). You can use the Set Combination function to create a password for resetting the maximum volume, or select Done. Now, when you crank the volume up to maximum, it won’t really be the maximum, and you’ll see a little lock symbol indicating that a reduced limit is in place.
Amazingly little formal study has been done on hearing loss from recreational devices. One such study dates back to 1996 (Airo, Erkko, et. al.; “Listening to Music with Earphones: An Assessment of Noise Exposure.”) in which the authors found that while most of the 45 sampled subjects were not at risk, 15% of them exceeded 85 dB listening levels in the field. “The music level was on average set to exceed 85 dB when the background noise level was 72 dB. Some hearing loss risk would be expected when [music players] are used in noisy conditions at work or among traffic.”
The moral of the story? Turn it down. Many people can’t tell the difference with headphones between 70 or 75 dB and 85 dB. You can crank it, but crank slowly and stop when the sound level is comfortable, not “intense!” Remember that the longer you listen at excessive levels, the louder you’ll have to keep cranking it in order to overcome subtle, progressive damage. Real damage may take years to detect, and by then it’ll be too late. Point for Mom.
- Previous page Damage Sets In
- Next page Tune It Out






One word: Google.
Gosh, we're not the general public... we're nerds
correction, physical pain doesn't set in at 130db, feeling sets in at about 130 db, so that bass that you feel thumping is above 130db, but since volume is a function of decibels and frequency it is very quiet. but children wailing is very high pitched so them at 80 db is significantly louder than the bass in your car. if you want to learn more than just do some more googling around. try searching "volume"
A clarification on ANC theory. There is no "anti-noise" generated. Ambient sounds strike the speaker cone moving it. Essentially the ANC signal applied to the diaphragm resists this motion of the cone, holding it still. Without movement the sound energy is dissipated as heat on the back surface of the cone. It is not canceled out in the classic sense, the compression and rarefaction of sound waves are mechanically destroyed.
One more really simple thing to add here. Put some really high-quality foam earplugs in your ear canal AND use your ANC headphones. This is what I do when I fly (Bose QC2's and custom-fit plugs). You've got to have enough sound without distortion in your headphones to overcome the attenuation of the plugs but for the most part their response curve is flat (if not a bit high on the low end). So your tinny-sounding earphones are actually going to have a bit more bass overall.
I've also been known to wear my Shure earbuds under my QC2's but they stick out far enough that I have to be careful not to touch them against the inside of the headphones. The nice bit is that even sitting in the back of an MD-80 I've only got to put my iPod at about 25% volume to hear every detail.
Shures with QC2 sounds like Heaven...assuming Heaven is a very quiet place. :-)
Regarding joeman42's comment, first, I'm going to say that I am definitely not a sound engineer nor any kind of other acoustic specialist, so the depth of my understanding may need improvement. However, the description I gave of ANC fits every description of the technology I've been exposed to over the years. For example, check this paper: http://doctord.dyndns.org:8000/Pubs/POTENT.htm, which describes the ANC process like so: "the noise is modeled to produce an anti-noise waveform at the output speaker." Given this guy's title as Vice President of R&D for Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. and the fact that this paper appeared in an IEEE publication, I'm pretty confident of the source.
Another very entertaining article from you.
“(Once again, you can tell something about the quality of a site’s content by the frequency of typos and errors in its text.)”
You might want to change that line before someone of bestofmedia knocks on your door and gives you a kick in the nuts when you open.
Another very entertaining article from you.“(Once again, you can tell something about the quality of a site’s content by the frequency of typos and errors in its text.)”You might want to change that line before someone of bestofmedia knocks on your door and gives you a kick in the nuts when you open.
Yeah, I can add that to the list of reasons I've given them. ;-) But really, you can tell the difference between a rushed schedule and borderline illiteracy or outright disregard for quality. If I've got to take one in the giggleberries for saying that Web sites in general need better quality control, so be it, but I think Bestof has a good crew that does good work. I'd rather have a few typos and solid reporting from people who care about the readers' best interests than a lot of the over-polished, under-thought dreck common in the field.
Thanks for the kind words.
Interesting article
I have hearing loss. I was born since birth, and therefore, I can't use headphones or go to rock concerts, lest I risk damage to my ears. I have never used an i Pod for more than a few minutes, and I'm glad.

I'm 15 years old, and I estimate that by the time I'm 40, my generation will have worse hearing than me. I'll be laughing "I HAD hearing loss BEFORE it was POPULAR!"
I should hope so.