Apple's Siri is a watered-down version of an extremely intelligent AI capable of calling you a cab.
The Huffington Post has an interesting story about the history of Apple's Siri, painting a picture of a now-watered-down AI that originally made its debut as a foul-mouthed standalone app for iOS and Android back in 2010. That's right: Siri used to say the F-word, something you'll never hear the virtual assistant say now that she sleeps under Apple's roof.
Dag Kittlaus, Siri's co-founder and chief executive, said that the AI's attitude had been carefully crafted, and it even had a backstory. Siri was to be "otherworldly" and armed with a dry wit, but vaguely aware of popular culture. It didn't communicate with a voice, but replied to the user with text based on information pulled from 42 different web services like Yelp, StubHub, Rotten Tomatoes, Wolfram Alpha and more.
"It had been able to buy tickets, reserve a table and summon a taxi, all without a user having to open another app, register for a separate service or place a call. It was already on the verge of 'intuiting' a user's pet peeves and preferences to the point that it would have been able to seamlessly match its suggestions to his or her personality," the Huffington Post writes.
Siri was originally designed to be a "do engine" that was capable of holding conversations with its users (which Apple still tries to convey in its Siri commercials). A user who had too many drinks could simply say "I'm drunk take me home," and Siri would have enough smarts to send a car service to the user's present location.
Siri's roots actually stems back to the Defense Department-funded project CALO, or Cognitive Assistant that Learns and Organizes. The project was developed at the non-profit Stanford Research Institute (SRI) international research lab which contracted with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Members of the team saw that the technology could lead to a profitable company, thus the 24-person startup Siri was founded by Kittlaus along with Adam Cheyer (VP Engineering) from SRI, and Tom Gruber (CTO/VP Design).
In 2009, Verizon signed a deal with Siri to make the virtual assistant a default app on all Android phones set to launch in 2010. But Apple quickly swooped in and purchased the company, insisting that Siri be an iPhone exclusive and thus terminated the Verizon deal. Prior to that, Siri had been available on both Android and iOS for a full two months.
Now Siri is a less robust version of its former self, cut off from most of the services that made it highly intelligent. Since Apple's acquisition, Siri has gained a voice and additional languages, but the AI is far from the conversational intelligence Apple depicts in its TV adverts. Apple's overbloated size has reportedly hindered its ability to forge deals with the services once synced with Siri.
Ultimately the potential for Siri to be great once again is there, but whether it reaches that level again is up to Apple and service providers. To read the full extensive history of Siri, head here.
Then I have some idiot go "APPLE DIDNT INVENT VOICE, MICROSOFT HAD IT BEFORE, DUR" well you're right, but Siri is a nearly perfected version. Its improved, it functions properly and with millions of people using it regularly its "training" itself damn quickly.
Whereas other voice systems? Naw. Not nearly as effective.
I have a couple friends with the new iphone who wish they hadn't 'upgraded' - siri in particular is a letdown for them. It's moderately successful if one is in a padded cell, but if there's any other background noise, including gunfire from a video game in the next room, it can't get hardly anything right.
Funny, i get the complete opposite. Even with background noise it gets it right. Also, there are hundreds of comparison videos that display Siri being better, than Google, than Siri, Google, Siri, Google. So none of them imo hold any weight.
I know it wasn't in the first paragraph in the article, so you probably missed it, but Apple didn't create Siri either. They just bought the company that did then dumbed it down and claimed it as their own.
How many times can you ask your phone to be your girlfriend before it becomes boring. The answer is 2 times.
Um put any Google smartphone against any iPhone and Google loses as it pertains to be "faster" which is a useless term.
Skynet anyone? What would it be like if iphones became self aware and tried to take over the world?
apply numbers are down everywhere but in the US , but you are correc tin that they are growing in the US, it is not fair to say they are defeating android though as they are both growing, ios is just getting more of the losses from RIM than google, both platforms have their strengths and weaknesses, i went android for freedom of side loading apps and ease of modification, if somebody wants a closed system but that work well without any desire to modify then ios is a good option.
You know nothing and cater to your Android fan boys. There is more to the SIRI story as well as other companies that have attempted to copy SIRI and will continue to copy Apple products in general. It is impossible to innovate anything and everything consistently but Apple has lead with innovative designs that are copied repeatedly. Just keep coming up with nonsense about Apple because it makes you feel better and ignore the fact that Android today wouldn't be nearly as popular if it didnt borrow heavily from Apple's built from the ground up iOS.
You obviously didn't bother to RTFA -- that Siri existed as an app on iOS & Android before Apple is firmly established, both with users that had the old version installed, with the company that created it and the DoD initiative behind it. Apple didn't create or design it.
Regarding iOS, if you do your research, you'd find that Apple didn't 'design' it from the ground up — they borrowed very heavily from earlier smartphones and even more from the PDAs that serve as ancestors & popular customization programs for them. No different, really, from the way they've "borrowed" components for OS X from BSD (which they built OS X on top of, incidentally) and its sibling Linux. This goes all the way back to when the first Mac was in the planning process and Apple "borrowed" the design for the mouse literally right out of Xerox's R&D area!
It's sad when people fall for clever identity-based marketing to the point that they stop seeing their purchase as just a well-designed imperfect product, and begin reacting to comments about the company/products as if judgment was being passed on them as a human being instead. Maybe someday we'll find a way to educate kids & adults so they won't be so susceptible to the marketing tactics that produce that mentality.
Geez, I never even mentioned Android. Overzealous fanboy? I'm talking about the company Apple in general. Hell, on the subject of phones, yeah Apple made a good leap with the first iPhone. Before the iPhone 4, I always wanted one of the new iPhones (that came out every other month). But there are better alternatives out now and Apple is still stuck in its little game of trying to kill competition with patents and lawsuits, rather than actually INNOVATE and BEAT the competition.
Btw, Android didn't "borrow heavily" from iOS. Android is built from the ground up on Linux.