Hospital Workers Fired for Posting Patient Pictures on MySpace
Two members of staff at the University of New Mexico Hospital have been sacked after it emerged they had taken pictures of patients and uploaded them to a popular social networking site.
The Associated Press reports that Director of Public Affairs Sam Giammo said Sunday the photos depicting up-close treatment of injuries in the hospitals emergency department were taken over the last few months and then uploaded to one employee’s MySpace Page.
The employee’s page was on private and so only visible to those who were already on their buddy list although whether the pictures were available only to a select few or not, this is clearly an invasion of patient privacy. In a time when data is going missing left, right and center and people are becoming more and more concerned about privacy online or otherwise, the actions of these employees is a bit of a head scratcher.
Giammo told the AP that UNMH values patient privacy very, very highly and we will do everything we can to protect them." He added that the hospital would not tolerate unprofessional actions from staff and so, have come down hard in disciplining those involved. While two employees have been fired for using mobile phones, several others are being disciplined for not informing supervisors of the behavior. The photos were discovered after one supervisor received an anonymous tip off last Tuesday.
According to the AP, Giammo said that the hospital just has to rely on the word of staff that there are no more pictures of patients floating around cyberspace, however this is not the first time we’ve heard of hospital workers photographing patients. Earlier this year reports emerged that several employees at the Tri-City Hospital in Oceanside were allegedly secretly taking pictures of patients and patient records with their cell phones and rules about the use of cell phones were implemented in UCLA’s neuropsychiatric hospital when a patient had posted group photos including other patients on a social-networking site back in March.
- Verizon Offers Contract-Free Service For Those Afraid of Commitment
- AT&T HomeManager Brings Back the Landline
- Microsoft's "I'm a PC" Ads Partly Produced on Macs
- Apple Recalls iPhone 3G Chargers Over Fire, Electrocution Danger
- FBI Searches Student's Apartment in Connection to Palin Hack
- SanDisk Announces New Physical Format for Music
- Hackers Use Google to Break Into Palin's Email Account
- Google Co-Founder Reveals He is "Substantially Predisposed" to Parkinsons Disease
- Cybersquatters Camp on Domain Names of Merged Financial Institutions
- Atari/Infogrames Transitioning to Digital Distribution of Games
- PlayStation Network Video DRM Decidedly User Unfriendly
- Fujifilm Develops 3D Camera
- Michael Moore Releases Free Documentary
- Yahoo! in Talks With AOL
- Musicians Makes Money From Streamed Media
- EA Sued Over Spore DRM
- Google Puts $10 million on the Table for Good Ideas
- T-Mobile Ups Android G1 Data Cap from 1 GB to Unlimited
- Former Googler Not Happy with Android Phones
They got what they deserve. Thats just wrong.
They got what they deserve. Thats just wrong.
agreed
ohhh... look how cute she looks with her broken arms....
yeah they shouldnt have done it
"up-close treatment of injuries"
This would mean that you can't id who is in the picture. Medical books and journals do this all the time without patient consent. Granted they are about education not hey look this is cool but you get the idea.
Yeah because these pictures were not of the full patient and specific to the region of the injury so that they are not identifiable then i disagree with the punishment (firings). If it was a complete image of a person or identifiable then go ahead and fire them but i really don't think this punishment fits the "crime"...
No shit.