Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Homeland Security Wants More 'Naked Scanners'

By - Source: Tom's Guide US | B 131 comments

Taking a flight? Prepare to be virtually strip-searched by Homeland Security.

Thanks to the Detroit-bound crotch bomber pretending to be a terrorist on Christmas Day, Homeland Security now wants to beef up security by installing more "naked scanners." It's either that, Homeland says, or getting a thorough "pat-down" before getting onto an airplane. Homeland, so it seems, would rather choose the former (and who can blame them--some people refuse to shower or use deodorant).

The problem with naked scanners, as the unofficial label obviously reveals, is that passengers are subject to digital strip searches of sorts, exposing areas best kept behind bedroom doors or within adult magazine covers. The Electronic Privacy Information Center is of course all over the possibility, literally stating that the whole-body imaging technology violates privacy rights. The group also claims that the devices "capture, record, and store detailed images of individuals undressed."

Currently the Transportation Security Administration has 40 full-body scanners installed in 19 airports nationwide: 6 use the machines for primary screenings, while the other 34 machines are used in 13 airports for follow-up searches. According to Wired, the TSA has forked over a $25 million contract to Rapiscan Security Systems this past October. The contract is for an additional 30 scanners.

The TSA is also ordering more backscatter x-ray scanners, devices that send out low-intensity beams. Apparently this type of device is excellent in imaging organic material. But despite what privacy advocates claim, the TSA naturally claims that there's no privacy issue. In fact, the agency said that the images could be pinned up in preschool classrooms. Thanks, but I'll just drive.

Discuss
Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the Streaming Video & TVs forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 25 Hide
    yrmoma , December 29, 2009 10:56 PM
    Or, we could just take that literally one in a million chance and travel without scanning me. You know, the old fashioned way of flying. Pretty sure we went many years without this being a problem, and will continue to have many more without them.

    I'd rather have liberty with less security than no liberty and a greater sense of security.
  • 18 Hide
    thackstonns , December 29, 2009 11:48 PM
    AMW1011I'm not partial to the idea, nor do I really think it will stop anything, but oh well if it makes some people feel safer than why not.


    So by that arguement you should allow me to place camera's in your home, cause then I could make sure you werent building a bomb in your bedroom. Or better yet the womens locker room at the local health club, because you know I think they are planning something fishy. Seems like they might be getting in shape to overthrow someone. Its people like you that are killing this country. Give me liberty or give me death.
  • 12 Hide
    princeofdreams , December 30, 2009 8:34 AM
    Seems strange to me, I am not American and so it hardly concerns me, but according to this report, they are using these in 19 airports in the USA, and only 6 of those are being used as initial screening devices, Do homeland security have fore knowledge on which airports a terrorist will use and the others are safe?

    Your rights will be continually eroded, your basic freedoms which you take for granted will all be stripped away in the name of national security, they just continually build fear until you surrender every freedom you have and completely give all of your life to the state.

    Answer this simple question, how many terrorists have been caught by these body scanners so far? The answer is a whopping great 0 :)  guess you need them on every street corner soon then.
Other Comments
    Display all 131 comments.
  • 25 Hide
    yrmoma , December 29, 2009 10:56 PM
    Or, we could just take that literally one in a million chance and travel without scanning me. You know, the old fashioned way of flying. Pretty sure we went many years without this being a problem, and will continue to have many more without them.

    I'd rather have liberty with less security than no liberty and a greater sense of security.
  • 3 Hide
    lifelesspoet , December 29, 2009 11:38 PM
    I'm not turned on the least bit by the pictures, but I would not always assume the same from random and perhaps very bored security officals.
  • -6 Hide
    deathmustard , December 29, 2009 11:39 PM
    This would not bother me and i am a fat guy so hey some times people just have to take naked scanner pictures of you. It happens.
  • -5 Hide
    AMW1011 , December 29, 2009 11:39 PM
    I'm not partial to the idea, nor do I really think it will stop anything, but oh well if it makes some people feel safer than why not.
  • 5 Hide
    djds20 , December 29, 2009 11:45 PM
    Now... that would be another reason to lose some fat...
  • 18 Hide
    thackstonns , December 29, 2009 11:48 PM
    AMW1011I'm not partial to the idea, nor do I really think it will stop anything, but oh well if it makes some people feel safer than why not.


    So by that arguement you should allow me to place camera's in your home, cause then I could make sure you werent building a bomb in your bedroom. Or better yet the womens locker room at the local health club, because you know I think they are planning something fishy. Seems like they might be getting in shape to overthrow someone. Its people like you that are killing this country. Give me liberty or give me death.
  • 5 Hide
    cj_online , December 30, 2009 12:31 AM
    Ugh... wow this is just plain sad..... Shit load of pervs here, this is probably their best chance to seek out on their "pleasures"
  • 10 Hide
    stevo777 , December 30, 2009 12:56 AM
    This violates constitutional law of illegal searches without due cause and many others. First, let's be serious, this is for the paranoid rich. The gov't doesn't really care about the average person. Second, I'm tired of "Terrorists" winning by systematically removing our privacy. It's very simple, the people in this country, with actual minds, need to engage in judicial warfare against the US government if they try and institute this psychotic technology. Yes, we do not need neurotic/psychotic paranoids dictating policy in this country. They are crossing the line this time.
  • 4 Hide
    urlsen , December 30, 2009 1:05 AM
    what about radiation issues.....maby mobiles "can" cause some problems but this defenetely will...even the dentist leaves the room while taking x-rays...
    Wiil americans be able to claim damages if they get cancer?????

    Hope this does not get to europe
  • 0 Hide
    tenor77 , December 30, 2009 1:45 AM
    I was going to volunteer at first, but I've seen some of the people flying.........no thanks
  • 10 Hide
    kidaquarius , December 30, 2009 1:54 AM
    yrmomaOr, we could just take that literally one in a million chance and travel without scanning me. You know, the old fashioned way of flying. Pretty sure we went many years without this being a problem, and will continue to have many more without them.I'd rather have liberty with less security than no liberty and a greater sense of security.


    +1
  • -9 Hide
    siman , December 30, 2009 2:17 AM
    yrmomaOr, we could just take that literally one in a million chance and travel without scanning me. You know, the old fashioned way of flying. Pretty sure we went many years without this being a problem, and will continue to have many more without them.I'd rather have liberty with less security than no liberty and a greater sense of security.


    I'm going to laugh at this when I get a thumbs down but whatever. But that one in a million chance cost thousands of peoples lives on 9/11 and millions of affected lives around the world. If you cant take it seriously then just don't fly and take a train or a bus. This nation is really sad when we already have forgotten 9/11, the people that work around the clock to protect and serve, or the people that have given their lives to the cause. The world is evolving and its becoming more hostile we need to accept this fact and get over it. So what if the machine scans you nothing different than taking a shower at the gym... pulse if your not guilty what do you have to worry about...?
  • -6 Hide
    Anonymous , December 30, 2009 3:28 AM
    Siman: Unfortunately, you already got a thumbs down for that very realistic and insightful comment of yours. I agree 100% with you thinking; however, it's a shame that 90% of the posters in this article are left-wing liberals.
  • -1 Hide
    CChick , December 30, 2009 3:48 AM
    keep using Anti-Terrorist as an excuse to put more restrictions on us.

    Might as well stop bothering people in the middle east. There you go.
  • -4 Hide
    CChick , December 30, 2009 3:52 AM
    simanI'm going to laugh at this when I get a thumbs down but whatever. But that one in a million chance cost thousands of peoples lives on 9/11 and millions of affected lives around the world. If you cant take it seriously then just don't fly and take a train or a bus. This nation is really sad when we already have forgotten 9/11, the people that work around the clock to protect and serve, or the people that have given their lives to the cause. The world is evolving and its becoming more hostile we need to accept this fact and get over it. So what if the machine scans you nothing different than taking a shower at the gym... pulse if your not guilty what do you have to worry about...?


    Protect and serve what? Sure protect all the "OIL FIELDS" so they can "SERVE THE RICH."

    World Police my ass. Yeah I dont see those faggots in the US do something about the Somalia pirates.
  • 4 Hide
    Hilarion , December 30, 2009 4:10 AM
    The TSA is wrong and if they hung these up in a preschool they should be arrested for it.
    Not only are the scans revealing, but they are recorded for the "edification" of bored TSA personnel. The old question about who watches the watchers applies very well in this situation.
    The other problem with these scanners and the back-scatter scanners is that there is evidence that they cause radiation damage to the cells of individuals exposed to the fields. TSA is completely ignoring this aspect of the problem.
  • 9 Hide
    Hilarion , December 30, 2009 4:23 AM
    otacon72NEGATIVE....flying on an airplane is a privilege NOT a right guaranteed under the constitution. If you don't want to be scanned then don't fly! I am so sick of these ACLU funboys. I would LOVE to see you go through Israeli airport security..lmao. They don't give a shit about your rights.

    That's right. Isreal doesn't give a shit about anyone's rights. And they scream anti-semitism if it's pointed out to them. Pointing them out as an example of how airports should be run isn't very intelligent.
Display more comments
Tom’s guide in the world
  • Germany
  • France
  • Italy
  • Ireland
  • UK
Follow Tom’s guide
Subscribe to our newsletter
  • add to twitter
  • add to facebook
  • ajouter un flux RSS