Download the
Tom's Guide App from the AppsStore
News and trends on internet
/ mobile / "sound & picture" / IT
Yes No

Homeland Security Wants More 'Naked Scanners'

- By - Source : Tom's Guide US

Taking a flight? Prepare to be virtually strip-searched by Homeland Security.

Thanks to the Detroit-bound crotch bomber pretending to be a terrorist on Christmas Day, Homeland Security now wants to beef up security by installing more "naked scanners." It's either that, Homeland says, or getting a thorough "pat-down" before getting onto an airplane. Homeland, so it seems, would rather choose the former (and who can blame them--some people refuse to shower or use deodorant).

The problem with naked scanners, as the unofficial label obviously reveals, is that passengers are subject to digital strip searches of sorts, exposing areas best kept behind bedroom doors or within adult magazine covers. The Electronic Privacy Information Center is of course all over the possibility, literally stating that the whole-body imaging technology violates privacy rights. The group also claims that the devices "capture, record, and store detailed images of individuals undressed."

Currently the Transportation Security Administration has 40 full-body scanners installed in 19 airports nationwide: 6 use the machines for primary screenings, while the other 34 machines are used in 13 airports for follow-up searches. According to Wired, the TSA has forked over a $25 million contract to Rapiscan Security Systems this past October. The contract is for an additional 30 scanners.

The TSA is also ordering more backscatter x-ray scanners, devices that send out low-intensity beams. Apparently this type of device is excellent in imaging organic material. But despite what privacy advocates claim, the TSA naturally claims that there's no privacy issue. In fact, the agency said that the images could be pinned up in preschool classrooms. Thanks, but I'll just drive.

Share:
132
Comments
X

Comments

yrmoma 12/30/2009 1:56 AM
Hide
-20+

Or, we could just take that literally one in a million chance and travel without scanning me. You know, the old fashioned way of flying. Pretty sure we went many years without this being a problem, and will continue to have many more without them.

I'd rather have liberty with less security than no liberty and a greater sense of security.

lifelesspoet 12/30/2009 2:38 AM
Hide
-3+

I'm not turned on the least bit by the pictures, but I would not always assume the same from random and perhaps very bored security officals.

deathmustard 12/30/2009 2:39 AM
Show
AMW1011 12/30/2009 2:39 AM
Show
djds20 12/30/2009 2:45 AM
Hide
-5+

Now... that would be another reason to lose some fat...

thackstonns 12/30/2009 2:48 AM
Hide
-18+

AMW1011 :
I'm not partial to the idea, nor do I really think it will stop anything, but oh well if it makes some people feel safer than why not.



So by that arguement you should allow me to place camera's in your home, cause then I could make sure you werent building a bomb in your bedroom. Or better yet the womens locker room at the local health club, because you know I think they are planning something fishy. Seems like they might be getting in shape to overthrow someone. Its people like you that are killing this country. Give me liberty or give me death.

deathmustard 12/30/2009 3:00 AM
Show
cj_online 12/30/2009 3:31 AM
Hide
-5+

Ugh... wow this is just plain sad..... Shit load of pervs here, this is probably their best chance to seek out on their "pleasures"

stevo777 12/30/2009 3:56 AM
Hide
-10+

This violates constitutional law of illegal searches without due cause and many others. First, let's be serious, this is for the paranoid rich. The gov't doesn't really care about the average person. Second, I'm tired of "Terrorists" winning by systematically removing our privacy. It's very simple, the people in this country, with actual minds, need to engage in judicial warfare against the US government if they try and institute this psychotic technology. Yes, we do not need neurotic/psychotic paranoids dictating policy in this country. They are crossing the line this time.

mlopinto2k1 12/30/2009 3:59 AM
Show
urlsen 12/30/2009 4:05 AM
Hide
-4+

what about radiation issues.....maby mobiles "can" cause some problems but this defenetely will...even the dentist leaves the room while taking x-rays...
Wiil americans be able to claim damages if they get cancer?????

Hope this does not get to europe

tenor77 12/30/2009 4:45 AM
Hide
-0+

I was going to volunteer at first, but I've seen some of the people flying.........no thanks

kidaquarius 12/30/2009 4:54 AM
Hide
-10+

yrmoma :
Or, we could just take that literally one in a million chance and travel without scanning me. You know, the old fashioned way of flying. Pretty sure we went many years without this being a problem, and will continue to have many more without them.I'd rather have liberty with less security than no liberty and a greater sense of security.



+1

siman 12/30/2009 5:17 AM
Show
Anonymous 12/30/2009 6:28 AM
Show
Anonymous 12/30/2009 6:33 AM
Show
CChick 12/30/2009 6:48 AM
Hide
--1+

keep using Anti-Terrorist as an excuse to put more restrictions on us.

Might as well stop bothering people in the middle east. There you go.

CChick 12/30/2009 6:52 AM
Show
Hilarion 12/30/2009 7:10 AM
Hide
-4+

The TSA is wrong and if they hung these up in a preschool they should be arrested for it.
Not only are the scans revealing, but they are recorded for the "edification" of bored TSA personnel. The old question about who watches the watchers applies very well in this situation.
The other problem with these scanners and the back-scatter scanners is that there is evidence that they cause radiation damage to the cells of individuals exposed to the fields. TSA is completely ignoring this aspect of the problem.

otacon72 12/30/2009 7:16 AM
Hide
--2+

stevo777 :
This violates constitutional law of illegal searches without due cause and many others. First, let's be serious, this is for the paranoid rich. The gov't doesn't really care about the average person. Second, I'm tired of "Terrorists" winning by systematically removing our privacy. It's very simple, the people in this country, with actual minds, need to engage in judicial warfare against the US government if they try and institute this psychotic technology. Yes, we do not need neurotic/psychotic paranoids dictating policy in this country. They are crossing the line this time.




NEGATIVE....flying on an airplane is a privilege NOT a right guaranteed under the constitution. If you don't want to be scanned then don't fly! I am so sick of these ACLU funboys. I would LOVE to see you go through Israeli airport security..lmao. They don't give a shit about your rights.

Hilarion 12/30/2009 7:23 AM
Hide
-9+

otacon72 :
NEGATIVE....flying on an airplane is a privilege NOT a right guaranteed under the constitution. If you don't want to be scanned then don't fly! I am so sick of these ACLU funboys. I would LOVE to see you go through Israeli airport security..lmao. They don't give a shit about your rights.


That's right. Isreal doesn't give a shit about anyone's rights. And they scream anti-semitism if it's pointed out to them. Pointing them out as an example of how airports should be run isn't very intelligent.

psycho sykes 12/30/2009 7:59 AM
Show
croc 12/30/2009 8:40 AM
Hide
-7+

The person that caused all of this fuss boarded a plane in Amsterdam... So is the US going to give every country that flies to the US one of these devices and insist that they use it? I think not. I fail to see how this 'solution' is really going to solve a 'problem', unless the 'problem' is tourists that will now not visit the US due to the ever more draconian requirements to get on a US bound flight, or the ever more draconian 'security procedures' involved in returning home. How many laptops do I have to have 'confiscated' by the TSA for 'checking'? (Never returned, btw...)

I used to enjoy holidaying in Hawaii, but no more. Next holiday will probably be to the south of France. Nicer people, better climate, and good wines.

The US can barricade itself behind walls, for all I care, and live out your wee paranoid fantasies. Don't forget to maintain your belief that 'the US is the best nation in the world' fantasy while you are at it.

JD13 12/30/2009 8:43 AM
Hide
-7+

They even say they had info on this nut case & still they DID NOT ACT!
The feds need to get up off their plush office chairs & do some real field work. Instead of taking the blame, Our freedom will be smashed into nothing ( just waiting for some new Bill to be signed into law) due to lazy police work. Better yet; why not just have everyone board the plane naked. That way they can't possibly miss any terrorists...

Clintonio 12/30/2009 9:17 AM
Hide
-5+

I remember seeing these a few months ago. I remember saying if a terrorist attacks again, these would come up as the 'new solution'. I do hate being right some times. I seriously hate these machines.

technogiant 12/30/2009 10:09 AM
Hide
-1+

I have no objections to this level of intrusuion I mean really have you looked at those pictures?
On the other hand though the line has to be drawn somewhere unless we intend to eventually subject all passengers to an intimate body cavity search :/

LaughALot 12/30/2009 10:16 AM
Show
the_krasno 12/30/2009 10:36 AM
Hide
-6+

I will pretend to have a peacemaker. Also, buy lead boxers.

princeofdreams 12/30/2009 11:34 AM
Hide
-12+

Seems strange to me, I am not American and so it hardly concerns me, but according to this report, they are using these in 19 airports in the USA, and only 6 of those are being used as initial screening devices, Do homeland security have fore knowledge on which airports a terrorist will use and the others are safe?

Your rights will be continually eroded, your basic freedoms which you take for granted will all be stripped away in the name of national security, they just continually build fear until you surrender every freedom you have and completely give all of your life to the state.

Answer this simple question, how many terrorists have been caught by these body scanners so far? The answer is a whopping great 0 :) guess you need them on every street corner soon then.

Anonymous 12/30/2009 2:03 PM
Show
rantoc 12/30/2009 2:18 PM
Hide
-4+

One step at a time...

One day you wake up without any freedom at all in the name of justice - chained against a wall.. don't forget you could one day become a terrorist so the "threat" have to be eliminated before it even arises!