Report: iPad 3 Design is the Same as the iPad 2
Will the iPad 3 carry the same design as the iPad 2? According to iLounge, yes.
When Apple launched the iPhone 4S, many people were disappointed. For one thing, it wasn't the iPhone 5. For another, it was basically just a copy of the iPhone 4 with some minor hardware upgrades.
Something similar happened with the iPad 2. It made no real huge departure from the original iPad in terms of design. It was a little slimmer, sure, and there were some minor upgrades inside, but the two devices looked largely the same. Many assumed that this meant the iPad was subject to the same iPhone 3G to 3GS (and now iPhone 4 to 4S) update cycle in that there would only be a major upgrade every other year, with small tweaks to these models in the years between. However, it seems those looking forward to an all new iPad will be disappointed yet again with the iPad 3.
The folks over at iLounge claim to have seen and handled an iPad 3 at CES 2012. Now, of course, we all know that Apple isn't actually at CES, and iLounge doesn't mention which company brought along an iPad 3 for show and tell. That said, iLounge's Jeremy Horwitz is reporting that the device is present at the show but is so similar to the iPad 2, many wouldn't even know they were looking at the unannounced, unconfirmed iPad 3.
"I'd show you a picture, but there's honestly nothing to be seen," he writes, before describing a tablet that is 1-mm thicker but otherwise almost identical to the iPad 2. The camera in the upper left corner is a little larger, and Horwitz says it looks very similar to the improved camera in the iPhone 4S, but, again, this isn't all that noticeable, especially from a distance. There are also rumors about a slightly small display for iPad 3, but (once again), if that was there, it wasn't obvious. Interestingly, Horwitz also mentions that the device he handled didn't look like it had just rolled off the assembly line a few weeks ago.
"I don't get the impression that what I saw was just manufactured—it actually seemed to be more than half a year old," he writes. "That's not a huge surprise given how long pre-production takes for a "new" device, but a lot can change between mid-2011 and early 2012. All I can tell you is that every company I've asked about the next iPad seems to think what I've told you above is correct, apart from the possible screen size tweak, which remains uncertain."
Assuming iLounge did actually play with something that was not an iPad 2, we think there's a couple of possibilities. First, this could be a now out-of-date prototype developed months ago. As Horwitz said, a lot can change in six months. It's possible this is just an early design for the iPad 3 (or an iPad 2S?) and the product we're expecting to be announced in the near future will be quite different. Second, it's also possible that this is the iPad 3 and Apple just hasn't seen fit to change the design, because the current design is just fine.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it, right?
Just because the exterior looks the same, that doesn't mean there isn't a boatload of changes under the hood. Horwitz did mention that this model was 1-mm thicker than an iPad 2, which would indicate to us that there was a need for a little more space inside, so we're hoping that this is the case. Notably absent was any mention of the rumored Retina display, which we had hoped to see with iPad 2. This would only be noticeable if the unit was actually operational, though, and we're guessing it wasn't.
Perhaps we're a little bit jaded, but we're taking this one with a pinch of 'pics or it didn't happen' and hoping the iPad 3 will, at least in terms of hardware, be quite a departure from iPad 2. Only time will tell. In the mean time, if you're eager to hear more about iLounge's experience with this new breed of iPad, you can head on over to the article and check it out for yourself.
- The Hercules DJ Control Air is Mind Blowing
- Longboard Made Awesome With Windows 8 Tablet & Kinect
- The Best of CES: Fujifilm's X-Pro 1
- The Best of CES: Lenovo's IdeaPad Yoga
- Sony Denies PlayStation 4 Appearance At E3 2012
- The Best of CES: Zik Parrot By Starck Headphones
- The Best of CES: Samsung WF457 Washer and Dryer
- Mimoco Unveils New Micro USB Card Readers, Drives at CES
- Tosy's Dancing Robot Charms And Girates
- EA Says Use of Brands In Video Games Is Free Speech
- Watch Tosy's Drawing Robot Draw A Dragon
- Samsung '12 Bluray Players Store Movies on the Cloud
- Ears-on With Silentium's Noise-canceling Quiet Bubble
- This Watch Lets You Make Cardless MasterCard Payments
- This microSD Card Adds NFC To Any Android, iOS Device
- New Google Search Feature Already Ruffling Legal Feathers
- Gaikai: Microsoft or Sony Leaving Next-Gen Console Race
- Immersive Fun With the Android Powered Sensics Smart Googles
- 3D Laser Projected Sharks Invade CES 2012



Since when does Apple ever do anything new?
So what? The whole point of these upgrades is to improve the hardware. There is no need to whine about how the design didn't change, it looks and works well as it is.
Not sure they need to do much of a redesign, it's form factor and aesthetics still work well. I think it would be quite successful just updating the internals and putting in a higher resolution screen if they also provide a killer software application to highlight those changes.
The iPhone 4s was not much of an upgrade in the standard sense, but with Siri it shines over the iPhone 4.
why would it be any different....it's very easy to mass-produce components
Good, i hope so. I always hate when a new form factor is produced. There are never any good cases or accessories at launch.
Since when does Apple ever do anything new?
Huh? What is that about. How many times did the Samsung Galaxy design completely change or what about the Droid. Motorola, Samsung, and HTC recycles designs over and over and over again with just improvements in the underline hardware and the software and in some cases not even the software. Cmon man, the IPAD 2 is designed well, sells well, performs well and dominates it's space.
They really do not have to do a design change, introduce Siri, put some new hardware under the hood, add a Retina display and the thing will sell tons no problem.
"it was basically just a copy of the iPhone 4 with some minor hardware upgrades."
I'm not sure what you mean by "minor". The CPU, GPU, memory, and camera saw significant upgrades on the 4S, even though the exterior was virtually identical to the iPhone 4.
I would've thought Apple would change the design at least a little bit after all the complaints about how easily the back of the iPad scratches and begins to look bad compared to their competitors.
innovation at it's finest ahahahha
We're so used to Apple being at the forefront of aesthetic design, any non-major change becomes unheard of.
Being the market leader is hard to innovate, you're thinking of the ideas.
Apple products need that reason to upgrade. That new feature nobody has heard of.
There's only so much you can do. You can't retina or siri twice.
So what? The whole point of these upgrades is to improve the hardware. There is no need to whine about how the design didn't change, it looks and works well as it is.
for normal people yes, for Mac people a design change is not happening is close getting of bulldozer instead of an Ivy Bridge.
iPad 2S?
big news, apple products look the same as the previous. there is no innovation in the design department.
Not sure they need to do much of a redesign, it's form factor and aesthetics still work well. I think it would be quite successful just updating the internals and putting in a higher resolution screen if they also provide a killer software application to highlight those changes. The iPhone 4s was not much of an upgrade in the standard sense, but with Siri it shines over the iPhone 4.
Except the Apple apologists tries to cover for the shortcomings of siri by emphasizing it's BETA. So all sides can agree that 4s is the iphone 4 with test software.
And this is the point when the tablet multiverse begins to plateau and plummet back to earth... enjoy the ride, iFanboys......
Except the Apple apologists tries to cover for the shortcomings of siri by emphasizing it's BETA. So all sides can agree that 4s is the iphone 4 with test software.
Yeah, the iPhone 4s is the iphone 4 with test software... oh and a better camera, faster memory, and the small matter of what REMAINS the fastest CPU/GPU combination in any phone ever made.
$$$ = Old rope
what is see is toms becoming mediocre like most of iphone and ipad users that just buy it for the bling and show off.
The only thing disappointing about this news is that its on toms.
Apple's marketing dept. will just say it's sexier and it will sell. As if most iSheep cares about what's inside. As long as it has new name, they'd buy it.
Since when does Apple ever do anything new?
Why change what isn't broken?
I'm not a fan of everything Apple, nor their pricing on some things. But to say what you did is absurd.
Lets just talk about a few of the things in the last 10 years.
* I had mp3 players before iPods, but there's no question the sleek design and the easy access to files with the scroll wheel was a great idea.
* I used online mp3 stores to download music before iTunes. But there's no question iTunes brought together a large selection from many music corporations for people to easily download and pay music.
* iPhone, since when was touch phones really a reasonable choice for a phone since the iPhone?
* iPod touch, this completely has changed personal devices that has eaten a great share from mp3 players and portable gaming / apps.
* App store, yes they were around before, but nothing even came close to Apple's App Store for mobile
* Tablets, yes there were around before, and every single one flopped. No you have everyone including your neighbour trying to sell a tablet, albeit almost all unsuccessfully.
* Ultra-books. All attempts previously failed essentially. Now with the success of the MacBook Airs once again, you can find every computer manufacturers trying to come out with their version.
* FaceTime
* Retina Display
* Siri
* I can mention some Desktop OS stuff, but I won't.
I think you get the picture now...
Nothing like a woman to complain about the aesthetics of a device whose usefulness has absolutely nothing to do with what it "looks" like.
Maybe the title of this article should be, "I want a pink iPad3"
Minor? The only thing that did not change was the case and screen.
So if they are not having to have a whole new casing made does that mean that mass production will drive down costs?
...
Don't hold your breath
The typical iCrap moron could not care less about the hardware, servicibility, or even the casing as long as it sport the Apple logo. WHY DOES APPLE NOT JUST SELL ITS LOGO ALONE.
Why should that be surprising? It's pretty much the same as the iPad 1.
Well, the visible components (general shape, color, screen size) aren't what we're claiming is broken... it's the primarily the OS that's broken. The ideal world for free computing in the tablet world will be when you can select whether you want iOS or Android on your tablet.
However, I still wouldn't buy any Apple product due to personal disagreements (not to mention poor design) with their (lack of) business ethics. Vote with your wallet, as they say. I've cast my vote, will you?
I'm not a fan of everything Apple, nor their pricing on some things. But to say what you did is absurd.Lets just talk about a few of the things in the last 10 years.* I had mp3 players before iPods, but there's no question the sleek design and the easy access to files with the scroll wheel was a great idea.* I used online mp3 stores to download music before iTunes. But there's no question iTunes brought together a large selection from many music corporations for people to easily download and pay music.* iPhone, since when was touch phones really a reasonable choice for a phone since the iPhone?* iPod touch, this completely has changed personal devices that has eaten a great share from mp3 players and portable gaming / apps.* App store, yes they were around before, but nothing even came close to Apple's App Store for mobile* Tablets, yes there were around before, and every single one flopped. No you have everyone including your neighbour trying to sell a tablet, albeit almost all unsuccessfully.* Ultra-books. All attempts previously failed essentially. Now with the success of the MacBook Airs once again, you can find every computer manufacturers trying to come out with their version.* FaceTime* Retina Display* Siri* I can mention some Desktop OS stuff, but I won't.I think you get the picture now...
You admit mp3 players before iPod, and mp3 stores. I think iTunes is the most expensive, clumsiest place to get music. I'd buy a CD before considering iTunes.
I had a touch phone before the iPhone existed. In fact, I went through 2 of them, and loved them. I have never liked the iPhone.
With app stores, they basically copied what already existed (Windows Mobile, Blackberry, etc.) but had a larger user-base.
"Ultra-books" only sell en masse because of their Apple branding. I had an "ultra book" type laptop before the Airs came out, and from my experience I wouldn't switch to an Air if you gave it to me for free.
Facetime - umm, ever heard of skype? Just implemented it on a phone and changed its name.
Retina display - well, the very fact that you list this shows you don't know much about it. Anyone who knows the history of that term and what it actually means will understand.
Siri - Apple didn't create Siri, they bought it and slapped it on the iPhone, stuck an "S" on the end of the model #, and made people pay for a whole new phone to use it.
Yeah, Apple's quite the innovator...
O_o
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVztngwuqzc
Applies to the iPad 3 as well.
I may not be a visionary, but I can't really see how they could redisign a tablet. Upgrade the hardware, add or remove a port there and there,sure. But what else? A true innovation would be to make it foldable. Hard to do with the technology we have to day, but soon...
Since when does Apple ever do anything new?
Since they're leading the mobile app market, with the vast majority of revenue coming in from app sales across all platforms being on iOS, and because the majority of apps and games that are released on mobile platforms are released on iOS either first or exclusively, and because iOS doesn't lag during simple tasks such as screen changing, so a 1Ghz dual core CPU is currently good enough.
That said, nobody knows what hardware will be in the iPad 3, so who knows if they'll bump up the clock speed, add more cores, add more RAM, etc?
Not that it matters, because anybody who doesn't worship Android is down-ranked to oblivion, while they're busy modding the ROMs on their laggy, insignificant Android phones because they have no good apps to keep them busy.
Minor? The only thing that did not change was the case and screen.
I like how truthful statements are down-ranked around here.
This comment system makes me sad, no wonder people hate Americans.