Here at Tom’s Guide our expert editors are committed to bringing you the best news, reviews and guides to help you stay informed and ahead of the curve!
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
If you followed our CES 2026 coverage, you probably heard about a new technology coming this year called RGB Mini-LED or MicroRGB. Every company has a different name for it, but they all work by shrinking the size of red-, green- and blue-colored LEDs in the backlight of an LCD TV (hence the name).
The benefit of these shrunk-down LEDs, as it was explained to me at CES, is better color saturation — and early testing results have been promising — but it turns out that the truth is more complicated.
See, instead of using their native colors to boost color volume to its maximum extent in your favorite shows and movies, some TV makers' LEDs mostly default to the same old white backlight that we’ve had on Mini-LED TVs for years. Here’s why that’s a problem.
RGB TVs: Impressive for TV testers, but less so for the everyday viewer
If you search up RGB TV technology, one of the first big claims that you'll see is for 100% Rec.2020 color coverage. It looks good on the box, but as you'll soon learn, it's not the whole truth.
To test color vibrancy, we measure what the TV outputs against one of the three major color spaces: Rec.709, DCI-P3 and Rec.2020. The last one, Rec.2020, has the widest color volume and is physically impossible for an LCD-based TV to cover.
Turn on real content ... and the output of these LEDs go from red, green and blue back to pure white (at worst) or some combination of two of the RGB LEDs (at best).
But, interestingly, if you use a software called Calman to grab some data points on how colorful RGB TVs are, you'll actually see that they surpass the Rec.2020 color space. Usually Mini-LED TVs don't come close.
While some the newest Mini-RGB TVs might reach 100% of the Rec.2020 color gamut, they can only do it when you’ve got one of these test patterns pulled up. Turn on real content, like the latest episode of “A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms”, and the output of these LEDs go from red, green and blue back to pure white (at worst) or some combination of two of the RGB LEDs (at best) then use a color filter to transform it into another color.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Here’s a less technical explanation
In simulations it’s the fastest car ever made, but instead of letting it shift into its highest gears on the race track, you prevent it from ever going higher than third gear.
Imagine you’ve built a supercar that, thanks to your cutting-edge engineering, can reach blistering speeds. In simulations it’s the fastest car ever made, but on a real-world racetrack, it never gets higher than third gear.
That’s what it feels like is happening with Mini-RGB TVs.
Now, in their defense, both Samsung and LG have shown me a version of the technology that actually uses these Mini-RGB LEDs for their intended purpose, however that was in their flagship MicroRGB TVs, which is just two of about a half-dozen new RGB TVs coming our way in 2026.
What separates 'good' RGB TVs from 'bad' ones?
It all comes down to how the TVs use those RGB LEDs. The bad RGB TVs, due to their low number of zones, will need to default to a white backlight more often than the good ones will.
The better the processor and the more LED zones on the TV, the more saturated the colors will be.
The good ones will also use less power because they won't be running all three RGB LEDs at all times. They'll just use the one or two LEDs needed to create the color in that particular part of the screen.
The better the processor and the more LED zones on the TV, the more saturated the colors will be.
In lab tests, good and bad TVs might offer similar results, but real-world content will be the ultimate deciding factor.
Real-world testing is going to be key
The good news is that, here at Tom's Guide, we don't rely on lab test data alone — we actually bring each TV into one of our living rooms to test for a few weeks.
We watch regular content, not boring test patterns, to give you a better idea of what you’re going to experience if you buy whatever TV you’re reading about.
For these new Mini-RGB TVs, it’s that part that’s going to be absolutely critical. Our lab tests might say that these TVs cover 90% or more of the Rec.2020 color space, but until I see color saturation in real-world content that justifies the high sticker price, I'm not sold.
Now I just need to find myself some more Rec.2020 test content. (That's a joke, it doesn't exist yet.)
More from Tom's Guide

Nick Pino heads up the TV and AV verticals at Tom's Guide and covers everything from OLED TVs to the latest wireless headphones. He was formerly the Senior Editor, TV and AV at TechRadar (Tom's Guide's sister site) and has previously written for GamesRadar, Official Xbox Magazine, PC Gamer and other outlets over the last decade. Not sure which TV you should buy? Drop him an email or tweet him on Twitter and he can help you out.
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.
