Adobe Firefly used thousands of Midjourney images in training its 'ethical AI' model
About 5% of the total
Here at Tom’s Guide our expert editors are committed to bringing you the best news, reviews and guides to help you stay informed and ahead of the curve!
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Daily (Mon-Sun)
Tom's Guide Daily
Sign up to get the latest updates on all of your favorite content! From cutting-edge tech news and the hottest streaming buzz to unbeatable deals on the best products and in-depth reviews, we’ve got you covered.
Weekly on Thursday
Tom's AI Guide
Be AI savvy with your weekly newsletter summing up all the biggest AI news you need to know. Plus, analysis from our AI editor and tips on how to use the latest AI tools!
Weekly on Friday
Tom's iGuide
Unlock the vast world of Apple news straight to your inbox. With coverage on everything from exciting product launches to essential software updates, this is your go-to source for the latest updates on all the best Apple content.
Weekly on Monday
Tom's Streaming Guide
Our weekly newsletter is expertly crafted to immerse you in the world of streaming. Stay updated on the latest releases and our top recommendations across your favorite streaming platforms.
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
Adobe has always sold its artificial intelligence image generator Firefly as a form of ethical AI, training it primarily on its own library of licenced stock images — millions of photos, designs and illustrations from the Adobe Stock library.
A new report by Bloomberg claims this squeaky clean image may not be as perfect as the Photoshop-maker would like us to think. The "commercially safe" model may have a few not-so-well sourced skeletons in its training data.
During the process of training the Firefly AI model, some of the images came from competitor Midjourney. The startup has never declared the source of its training data but many suspect it is from images it scraped from the internet without licensing.
Adobe says only about 5% of the millions of images used to train Firefly fell into this category and all of them were part of the Adobe Stock library, which meant they'd been through a "rigorous moderation process."
Why is this such a big deal?
When Adobe first launched Firefly it offered an indemnity against copyright theft claims for its enterprise customers as a way to convince them it was safe.
Adobe also sold Firefly as the safe alternative to the likes of Midjourney and DALL-E as all the data had been licensed and cleared for use in training the model.
Not all artists were that keen at the time and felt they were coerced into agreeing to let their work be used by the creative tech giant — but the sense was any image made with Firefly was safe to use without risk of being sued for copyright theft.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Is Firefly still copyright safe?
Despite the revelation some of the images came from potentially less reputable sources, Adobe says all of the non-human pictures are still safe.
A spokesperson told Bloomberg: "Every image submitted to Adobe Stock, including a very small subset of images generated with AI, goes through a rigorous moderation process to ensure it does not include IP, trademarks, recognizable characters or logos, or reference artists’ names."
The company seems to be taking a slightly more rigorous step with its plans to build an AI video generator. Rumors suggest it is paying artists per minute for video clips.
I have reached out to Adobe for a comment on this story.
More from Tom's Guide
- Best photo editing software in 2024
- Adobe AI image generator just went global with huge update — what you need to know
- Adobe just put generative AI into Photoshop — what you need to know

Ryan Morrison, a stalwart in the realm of tech journalism, possesses a sterling track record that spans over two decades, though he'd much rather let his insightful articles on AI and technology speak for him than engage in this self-aggrandising exercise. As the former AI Editor for Tom's Guide, Ryan wields his vast industry experience with a mix of scepticism and enthusiasm, unpacking the complexities of AI in a way that could almost make you forget about the impending robot takeover.
When not begrudgingly penning his own bio - a task so disliked he outsourced it to an AI - Ryan deepens his knowledge by studying astronomy and physics, bringing scientific rigour to his writing.










