Source: Tom's Guide | Keywords: uberclok, reactor, system | Themes: Desktop Computers
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Überclok, Under the Skin
- 3. Internal Components, Continued
- 4. Test System Configuration
- 5. Comparison System & Benchmark Settings
- 6. Benchmark Results - 3D Games
- 7. Benchmarks - 3D Games, Continued
- 8. Benchmarks - Audio, Video and Applications
- 9. Benchmarks - Synthetics
- 10. Benchmarks - Synthetics, Continued
- 11. Benchmarks - Synthetics, Continued
- 12. Conclusion
8. Benchmarks - Audio, Video and Applications
Audio

The Überclok Reactor encoded a large wave file to Apple’s iTunes format at incredible speed, blowing away the XPS 630 by 136%.

Lame MP3 encoder gets less benefit from Überclok’s higher speed, but its 51% performance increase is still admirable.
Video

Überclok Reactor’s overclocked processor helps it to transcode a DVD9 video to the smaller DVD4.7 size 36% faster than the lower-cost Dell XPS 630.

TMPGenc sees a 34% performance gain from the Überclok Reactor’s overclocked CPU.

Mainconcept h.264 encoding hands a 48% lead to the Überclok Reactor.

Even though the Überclok Reactor has a much faster processor than the Dell XPS 630, Studio 11 shows only a 21% lead.
Applications

3D Studio Max 9 hands Überclok a 57% lead.

A super-fast processor puts the Überclok Reactor ahead of the XPS 630 by 52% in Cinema 4D.

Not quite as impressive as its Cinema 4D performance, the Überclok Reactor leads the XPS 630 by 45% in Acrobat 7 format conversion.

Überclok’s lead over the XPS 630 narrows even further, to 26% in Adobe Photoshop CS3.

Deep Fritz shows the Überclok Reactor with a 49% advantage in relative speed.

The Deep Fritz kilo nodes-per-second test shows little to no performance difference between the high-clock speed Überclok Reactor and stock-speed XPS 630.

WinRAR gains 40% from the higher-priced Überclok Reactor, and any limitation of performance gains could be caused by Uberclock’s selection of hard drive.
- Previous page Benchmarks - 3D Games, Continued
- Next page Benchmarks - Synthetics
with the exception of Supreme Commander and Warhammer. The games tested are clearly last generation. Why are you still running DX9 games to benchmark a DX10 system? get something there to actually stress the system a little bit.
Unlinked
FSB - 1779
RAM - 800
CPU core - 1.50v
CPU VVT - 1.35v
Nothbridge - 1.43v
LTD - 3x (Under Advanced Chipset Features)
Memory Timing - Auto
Would like to go higher than 4 but my abit FP-IN9 mobo refuses. The same with everyone else who has this board. Point is, you should get your e8400 up to 4.4 at least with a OC friendly board.
http://forus.vr-zone.com/showthread.php?t=139623
Check out those settings. Apparently raising the cpu vvt voltage quite high can help a lot with stability.
extra cooling for the northbridge would be a good idea though.