WPA Encryption Cracked in One Minute

By Kevin Parrish, published on August 27, 2009 at 6:20 PM
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: , , , , | Themes: The Internet, Software, Networking
Syndication: Add to your Google homepage Add to My Yahoo!

Two Japanese scientists have figured out a way to crack WPA encryption in sixty seconds.

Two Japanese scientists, Toshihiro Ohigashi of Hiroshima University and Masakatu Morii of Kobe University, plan to reveal how they can crack WPA encryption in sixty seconds at a technical conference taking place on September 25 in Hiroshima. PC Advisor said that the two scientists have designed an attack that gives hackers a way to read the encrypted traffic passed from PCs and certain routers that use WPA.

The method isn't new: security researchers revealed a way to break WPA encryption back in November. However, according to Dragos Ruiu, organizer of the PacSec security conference where the first WPA hack took place, the scientists have taken the supposed attack "to a new level," saying that they took theoretical information and made it "much more practical."

The previous attack method, developed by researchers Martin Beck and Erik Tews, took between 12 and 15 minutes to work on a smaller range of WPA devices. The PC advisor report also stated that both attacks only work on WPA systems that use the Temporal Key Integrity Protocol (TKIP) algorithm. Fortunately, the attack does not work on WPA systems using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) algorithm, or WPA 2 devices.

If this bit of news seems a little frightening, don't fret: many WPA routers allow users to switch from TKIP encryption to AES through the administration interface.

Comments | Print | Send to a friend

Sponsored links

Comments

ssalim 08/28/2009 12:42 PM
Hide
-20+

Gone in sixty seconds.

Anonymous 08/28/2009 12:47 PM
Hide
-7+

It irritates me how the nomenclature is often confused when it is so simple.

WPA is often equated with TKIP and WPA2 with CCMP, but this is wrong...
A wireless access point advertising WPA may offer TKIP or CCMP or both at the same time. The same is true with WPA2.

TKIP is RC4 based.

CCMP is AES based.

How is this hard to understand or explain? And more importantly, and worse!, why do manufacturers get it wrong?

Shadow703793 08/28/2009 12:52 PM
Hide
-4+

ssalim :
Gone in sixty seconds.


:lol: !

JohnnyLucky 08/28/2009 1:02 AM
Show
Anonymous 08/28/2009 1:08 AM
Show
Anonymous 08/28/2009 1:14 AM
Show
supertrek32 08/28/2009 1:29 AM
Hide
-8+

No matter how secure you think it might be, never trust wireless networks for security. If it's sensitive data, just wait until you can plug into the wall. You never know, so if you're paranoid enough that you truely want all that encryption, just use good ol' ethernet cables.

pakardbell486dx2 08/28/2009 1:51 AM
Hide
-1+

Sweet I can't wait tell they add this tool onto BackTrack

IzzyCraft 08/28/2009 2:00 AM
Hide
-0+

Depends how much power they are using, people can use a ps3 to brute force wpa in that amount of time etc.

matt87_50 08/28/2009 2:11 AM
Show
xaira 08/28/2009 2:16 AM
Show
one-shot 08/28/2009 2:21 AM
Hide
-0+

Hmmm. Good thing the college here has WPA with TKIP encryption....wait a minute....

Anonymous 08/28/2009 2:24 AM
Hide
-0+

Nothing is Hacker proof! Thank God!

tipoo 08/28/2009 3:59 AM
Hide
--3+

Meh...Who uses WPA now anyways?

betrayer_ 08/28/2009 4:21 AM
Show
tacoslave 08/28/2009 4:32 AM
Show
kikireeki 08/28/2009 4:40 AM
Hide
-0+

The IEEE 802.11 protocol has shown its vulnerability long time ago.

blackbyron 08/28/2009 6:20 AM
Hide
-0+

cracking the WPA encryption in 60 seconds seems impressive. :/

Judguh 08/28/2009 6:30 AM
Hide
--1+

supertrek32 :
No matter how secure you think it might be, never trust wireless networks for security. If it's sensitive data, just wait until you can plug into the wall. You never know, so if you're paranoid enough that you truely want all that encryption, just use good ol' ethernet cables.



Now... in a home environment - sure, that's fine - just make sure there's hook-ups available. For businesses though... Ethernet, sure, but having NAC with it is the way to go. It's a pain to setup, but very effective means of truly securing what devices connect where, when and how.

ben850 08/28/2009 8:58 AM
Show
r3t4rd 08/28/2009 10:55 AM
Show
Anonymous 08/28/2009 11:31 AM
Hide
-2+

hahahahaaaaaaaa.........
for WEP I can do it for 60 sec...............

megahunter 08/28/2009 1:26 PM
Hide
-0+

i'm using it open so no one can crack it haha dã :P

preciousl 08/28/2009 1:40 PM
Hide
-1+

megahunter :
i'm using it open so no one can crack it haha dã



It's a worthy theory, my father use to leave the windows down in his car when he parked in bad neighborhoods. He figured if someone wanted his radio they would break in anyway and this way he wouldn't have to pay for a new radio and new glass.

r3t4rd 08/28/2009 1:48 PM
Show
doc70 08/28/2009 2:08 PM
Hide
-3+

r3t4rd :
Why do you jest at my comment?I have Mac WiFi and running WEP = Inpenatrable. Macs are not prone to Security issues like Windows.


I remember that mini-contest at a hacker conference about 3 laptops (Mac, Win, Linux distro) as a chalenge to hack them (I believe the article was here on THG news); first place was the Mac one, cracked in a few seconds; the others came later at about the same time; so yes, the Macs are soooo secure.../sarcasm

r3t4rd 08/28/2009 2:30 PM
Hide
-0+

doc70 :
I remember that mini-contest at a hacker conference about 3 laptops (Mac, Win, Linux distro) as a chalenge to hack them (I believe the article was here on THG news); first place was the Mac one, cracked in a few seconds; the others came later at about the same time; so yes, the Macs are soooo secure.../sarcasm



Jeez...guys...can't take a little sarcasm? Yes yes I know. I was just poking fun at Macs. And I know WEP is even less secure than WPA but we don't have to go into the detials. I was just having fun. Do I have to type "/Sarcasm" at the head or end of every post I make?

r3t4rd 08/28/2009 2:36 PM
Hide
-0+

megahunter :
i'm using it open so no one can crack it haha dã



At least megahunter got my sarcasm....

*high fives megahunter*

Hanin33 08/28/2009 4:10 PM
Hide
--1+

almost every comment on this article is marked negative... someone really dislikes disparaging remarks towards the Japanese or anything to do with facts...

major7up 08/28/2009 6:30 PM
Hide
-0+

Have not used WPA or any wireless networking for a while, I wired my house instead and turned off wireless. I only enable it when I have visitors.

masop 08/28/2009 7:11 PM
Hide
-0+

Major7Up :
Have not used WPA or any wireless networking for a while, I wired my house instead and turned off wireless. I only enable it when I have visitors.



That is not usually a viable option except for new homes, as installing ethernet in all useful rooms in a home really tears up the walls and ceilings. Some might want to use their laptop in the cr@pper, but not me, lol. It's not worth it for most. The exception would be 1 or 2 rooms, depending upon the distance and routing of the cable and location of wall jacks.

If I had my choice, I'd buy a new home with CAT-6 installed in every room. To be as secure as I can be with my current equipment, I do the following:

1) Enable WPA-TKIP and use a long random password (my router doesn't support AES or WPA2)
2) Turn off SID advertising
3) Turn off DHCP
4) Enable MAC Address filtering
5) Assign Static IP's to specific MAC addresses in ACL

That is the most secure my home wireless network can be without having to buy another more modern/advanced wireless router. I'd recommend anyone with wireless home networks do the same, though WPA2 with AES is preferred. Just my 2 cents. :-)


Sponsored links