Adobe Halting Development on Flash Player Mobile
Development on Flash Player for Mobile will discontinue once version 11.1 for Android and BlackBerry is complete.
Wednesday Adobe confirmed that it is indeed dumping Flash Player for mobile browsers and will instead focus its mobile efforts on HTML5. In an official blog posted by Adobe's Danny Winokur, the company acknowledges that HTML5 is now universally supported on major mobile devices, and in some cases even exclusively.
"This makes HTML5 the best solution for creating and deploying content in the browser across mobile platforms," Winokur said. "We are excited about this, and will continue our work with key players in the HTML community, including Google, Apple, Microsoft and RIM, to drive HTML5 innovation they can use to advance their mobile browsers."
Following the upcoming release of Flash Player 11.1 for Android and BlackBerry PlayBook, Adobe will officially discontinue development on Flash Player for the mobile browser. Instead, all work with Flash for mobile devices will be focused on enabling Flash developers to package native apps with Adobe AIR for all the major app stores. However Adobe will still continue to provide bug fixes and security updates for existing device configurations.
"These changes will allow us to increase investment in HTML5 and innovate with Flash where it can have most impact for the industry, including advanced gaming and premium video," Winokur said. "Flash Player 11 for PC browsers just introduced dozens of new features, including hardware accelerated 3D graphics for console-quality gaming and premium HD video with content protection. Flash developers can take advantage of these features, and all that our Flash tooling has to offer, to reach more than a billion PCs through their browsers and to package native apps with AIR that run on hundreds of millions of mobile devices through all the popular app stores."
The HTML5 "exclusivity" comment made in Adobe's blog seemingly points to Apple and its stance against using Flash in iOS. "Flash was created during the PC era — for PCs and mice," the late Steve Jobs said. "Flash is a successful business for Adobe, and we can understand why they want to push it beyond PCs. But the mobile era is about low-power devices, touch interfaces and open web standards — all areas where Flash falls short."
Tuesday Adobe said that it is cutting 750 jobs in North America and Europe as part of "corporate restructuring" to add greater focus to its digital media and digital marketing software. The change is expected to reduce its revenue growth next year by between 30 cents to 38 cents a share, lower than its previously guided range of 41 to 50 cents. Shares dropped 9-percent to $27.64 after the news of the upcoming layoffs became public.
Adobe put up a good fight over the past two years trying to bring its Flash Player platform to the mobile sector. Google and RIM have even widely adopted Flash Player despite security issues surrounding the platform. But the software has brought its share of problems to the mobile internet, draining batteries, consuming large chunks of internal storage and eating up processor power. Load times can even be atrocious, a deterrent for those wanting to browse the web on the go.
Looking back, industry support for Adobe's Flash Player for mobile seemingly came to an end when Apple refused to adopt Flash. Facebook has even launched an HTML5 platform supporting a wide variety of apps and games.
"Steve Jobs kicked the industry forward a notch toward HTML5," said BGC Partners analyst Colin Gillis. "Open-source always wins, even it doesn't mean innovators are going to make money on it."
- FBI's Warrantless Searches Now Include Fake Cell Towers
- AT&T Launches VoIP App for Cheap International Calls
- Apple: Sorry, No Siri for Older iPhones
- Zuckerberg: Google+ is Just a "Little Version of Facebook"
- Next Amazon Tablet May Be Called Kindle Ice
- Mozilla's Boot 2 Gecko Mobile OS to Land 2012
- Here We Go Again: HP to Sell WebOS?
- Rumor: Next Xbox Will Have ARM CPU, Windows 9 Core
- iOS Bug Allows Malware to Be Sold in Apple App Store
- "Several Thousand" Apps Ready for Kindle Fire Next Week
- Barnes & Noble Wants Microsoft's Patents Probed
- Dell Launches 0.8-lbs Projector That Fits In Your Hand
- Honda Unveils New Autonomous ASIMO Robot
- Microsoft, AOL, Yahoo, Form Ad Alliance Against Google
- TELESAR V Robot: Avatar Meets Reality?
- Obama to Veto Legislation That Would Kill Net Neutrality
- 1896 EV Gets Same Mileage as Chevy Volt
- U.S. Officials Warn of Counterfeit Weapons Components
- Report: The 'Real' iPad 3 Not Coming Until Late 2012

Now if they'd only stop Flash for pc!!!
wow, admirable... i guess that is how you can stay at the top, by being flexible even if that means dropping your own product...
I can't wait for the day that computers no longer require flash player. Will make things so much easier and more stable.
Steve Jobs strikes from the grave. Good luck trying to run Farmville on HTML5
think its fair to call flash the single worst piece of mass market software in the history of computing.
It long ago took the crown my our old favorite, Realmedia player. Those were the days....
Maybe it was just me, but I never ran into any real issues with flash. It "was" a cpu hog at one time, but those days are far gone. As for security, well anyone with common sense does not have those issues either.
I do like the plugin free nature of HTML5, but they seems to be very fractured. some features only work on chrome or IE or FF ect. They need to ALL work on all browsers. Flash DID have that going for it. As a plugin, it worked on all browsers.
So, can I get java on iphone or what? I'm jsut saying I still go to sites that run applets.
For us web developers, we already steered clear of flash when developing sites that needed to run on mobile devices anyway. So in essence, nothing has really changed... Adobe just took out an option any sane Web Developer already avoided.
Flash was the worst thing ever... ...except for an HTML 5 powered web, controlled by Apple... Be careful what you wish for.
Dropping Flash is a good idea, it is eating away battery charge like a Humvee drinking gasoline.
So in essence, Adobe has admitted the loss of Flash against HTML5 in the mobile space?
Steve Jobs was a seer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPb9eRNyIrQ
... so he waz right!!!
For us web developers, we already steered clear of flash when developing sites that needed to run on mobile devices anyway. So in essence, nothing has really changed... Adobe just took out an option any sane Web Developer already avoided.
I understand, but I hate the way sites force me to mobile pages because of my device user agent. Sometimes I WANT desktop browsing from my mobile device.
Flash was the worst thing ever... ...except for an HTML 5 powered web, controlled by Apple... Be careful what you wish for.
Apple does not, will not, cannot control HTML5...Where do you people get these utterly rubbish notions from?
MS is the biggest control freak in the PC world
Now if they'd only stop Flash for pc!!!
It is acceptable on the Desktop as PC's have the power required to run the donkey. It is its anachronism and increasing irrelevance which will seal the fate of Flash.
Apple does not, will not, cannot control HTML5...Where do you people get these utterly rubbish notions from?MS is the biggest control freak in the PC world
Poor, misguided fool...
http://html5.tmcnet.com/topics/htm [...] atents.htm
Poor, misguided fool...http://html5.tmcnet.com/topics/htm [...] atents.htm
You are too harsh on yourself.
I seriously doubt Apple will push to enforce patents it filed for before becoming a member of W3C consortium; A Patent Advisory Group is always invoked as an arbitrator for W3C members.
You are too harsh on yourself.I seriously doubt Apple will push to enforce patents it filed for before becoming a member of W3C consortium; A Patent Advisory Group is always invoked as an arbitrator for W3C members.
You DID look at the date of the article I linked, right? July, this year, right? And you did note that the W3C is asking world and dog for prior art to try to invalidate the patents, right? Sounds like Apple will REALLY abide by the W3C arbitrators, right?
You poor dear... Apple will be only too happy to take your soul, for it seems that they already have your mind.
HTML5 still has a long way to go.
You DID look at the date of the article I linked, right? July, this year, right? And you did note that the W3C is asking world and dog for prior art to try to invalidate the patents, right? Sounds like Apple will REALLY abide by the W3C arbitrators, right?You poor dear... Apple will be only too happy to take your soul, for it seems that they already have your mind.
AT least I have a mind for APple to take...
The patents themselves are several years old. Chances are this sort of thing happens all the time as Apple/MS/Oracle et al sit on 1000's and 1,000's of patents and they will all have to be dealt with by internal administration which could take a few years but that does not mean Apple will end up enforcing the patent. You are making a assumption.
AT least I have a mind for APple to take...The patents themselves are several years old. Chances are this sort of thing happens all the time as Apple/MS/Oracle et al sit on 1000's and 1,000's of patents and they will all have to be dealt with by internal administration which could take a few years but that does not mean Apple will end up enforcing the patent. You are making a assumption.
I make no assumptions here, I only report for those browsing this website via a link to another article that is germane to this article. Apple IS opposing the W3C over (at least) two patents (one of which is still pending) covering issues that were part of the standard before Apple submitted patent applications. Apple has been one of the major backers of HTML 5, calling for that standard to replace Flash as well as a few other closed source systems, such as real player's media player, for example. Now that the standard is well and truly close to meeting that goal, Apple refuses to the license conditions of the consortium body of the standard that it was so brazenly touting as the future of the web.
If I were to make assumptions, it would be over the 'WHY' aspects of these facts. So, I WILL make some assumptions. At least some WAG's...
1. Apple wants another patent cannon to hold up to anyone it doesn't like. Meaning, ABA.
2. Apple wants to avoid losing its grip on music distribution, which an open source MM distribution model would do.
I could go on with WAG's all night long, but that's enough for now.
BTW, the pending patent was filed in Jul 2007, the approved patent Jun, 2010... And both cover aspects of the HTML5 protocol stack that were approved at least as early as 2005. ASS U MEing that Apple will play nice? Not me...
Looks like a Mac but it's a cool case.
thanks.
That's kind of a one sided article. Flash is not dead. It is just being wrapped in Air for mobile. "Our future work with Flash on mobile devices will be focused on enabling Flash developers to package native apps with Adobe AIR for all the major app stores."
http://www.uinerd.com/2011/11/adob [...] flash.html
"Our competitors told us that was in our best interest to release people from the prison of Flash," said Adobe Lead Marketing Dilettante Lawston Translation. "And HTML5 is so incredibly cool. Look at this neat bouncing ball demo! We figured, like, why hold people back?" Lawston took a long puff on his hand-rolled cigarette. Between coughs, he added, "Now Adobe developers are free to explore all the exciting new HTML5 products from other vendors. Wheeee!"
I like flash for the simple fact that the internet is full of it, and you can't really enjoy it without flash. If they keep updating security settings I don't mind. Hats off to them.