Rumor: New PSP Unveiling at E3; PS3 Slim Later

By Marcus Yam, published on May 28, 2009 at 2:10 PM
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: , , , , | Themes: Digital Entertainment
Syndication: Add to your Google homepage Add to My Yahoo!

PSP Go rumor gets legs. PS3 slim could be a reality?

Rumors of a new PlayStation Portable model have been flying around since 2008. With E3 just around the corner, most are expecting for Sony to make an announcement about a new PSP.

Ars Technica’s own sources are now reaffirming rumors first outted by 1Up, which said that the new hardware will ditch the UMD drive in favor of going strictly with built-in flash memory.

The new PSP won’t immediately replace the current version, as that would instantly split the market for games that are still shipping on UMD. Instead, the new PSP is said to sell alongside the existing PSP-3000. We’ll know for sure when E3 rolls around next week.

The more interesting rumor from Ars’ mole is that Sony is indeed working on a slimmed down version of the PlayStation 3, which we won’t be seeing at this E3. Supposedly the new slimmer PS3 will be a secret until stock of the current hardware dries up later in the summer.

Engadget earlier this month posted a picture of a box that showed a smaller, slimmer looking PS3-ish device. It’s not much, but certainly interesting and fun to ponder about.

Source: Engadget

E3 will be running from June 2 to 4, 2009.

Comments | Print | Send to a friend
Slideshows related to this news

Sponsored links

Comments

tenor77 05/28/2009 8:04 PM
Hide
-6+

Sony, I'm glad you're ditching UMD but if you want me to buy a PSP, please let us use SD cards.

tipoo 05/28/2009 8:57 PM
Show
AncientNoob 05/29/2009 12:19 PM
Show
LATTEH 05/29/2009 1:07 AM
Hide
--2+

if theres a slimer PS3 will the price go down? if it does i will buy one and see what ive been missing out on!

eddieroolz 05/29/2009 2:03 AM
Hide
-0+

That picture is so fake.

That's probably just an illusion. Put the camera right above the PS3, then take a few pictures. Voila, choose one that looks thin.

tacoslave 05/29/2009 2:35 AM
Hide
-0+

heres what i hope for the psp go just give us hd cards and a second analog stick i mean its not that hard and as for the slim ps3
at the MOST 300 dollars
ps2 and ps1 backwards compatibility(ok at least the ps2)
at least a bundeled game or extra controller


p.s they should take a note from microsoft and make a reeeeeealy cheap version for 200 max and have a high end option waiting.

Anonymous 05/29/2009 3:23 AM
Hide
--1+

I have never bought a ps2 or ps3. If they bring back the emotion engine HARDWARE in the PS3, I would buy it up sooo fast. Bring back (at least) the specs the system came with, don't cannibalize it.

planetacancun 05/29/2009 3:40 AM
Hide
-0+

I'm so sad because my old PS3 60 GB with Emotion Engine (hardware PS2) went ylod. Google that :P

jimmysmitty 05/29/2009 6:01 AM
Hide
-0+

I wounder how they would be able to keep the Cells heat down in a slim version of the PS3.....

The Cell does run pretty hot.....

bin1127 05/29/2009 10:09 AM
Hide
-0+

it's probably the rumours that suggested sony into making the slim version instead of the other way around. but hey, i don't have ps3 yet so i'll have a shot at waiting till the slim comes out.

Tindytim 05/29/2009 10:40 AM
Hide
-0+

ANDEssd :
I have never bought a ps2 or ps3. If they bring back the emotion engine HARDWARE in the PS3, I would buy it up sooo fast. Bring back (at least) the specs the system came with, don't cannibalize it.


Why would they need to? I'm pretty sure they can get an Emulator working for the PS3 (supposedly Sony did, but decided against it to keep PS2 sales up). Hardware emulation is great from a compatibility stand point, but it means the quality isn't going to increase by much (upscaling).

With Software Emulation you can render at higher resolution, use AA, filter the textures to increase the quality, and various shader options.

apmyhr 05/29/2009 12:10 PM
Hide
-0+

jimmysmitty :
I wounder how they would be able to keep the Cells heat down in a slim version of the PS3.....The Cell does run pretty hot.....


After a quick look at Wikipedia, the first PS3's used a 90nm Cell procssor. Now they use a 65nm Cell. I would bet that by the time this slim version is released, they will have moved to a 45nm Cell. That CPU should produce a lot less heat than the original 90nm Cells.

apmyhr 05/29/2009 12:13 PM
Hide
-0+

tacoslave :
heres what i hope for the psp go just give us hd cards and a second analog stick i mean its not that hard and as for the slim ps3at the MOST 300 dollarsps2 and ps1 backwards compatibility(ok at least the ps2)at least a bundeled game or extra controllerp.s they should take a note from microsoft and make a reeeeeealy cheap version for 200 max and have a high end option waiting.


If they switch the Cell processor manufacturing to 45nm, I would expect manufacturing prices to drop significantly due to the cheaper processor, less need to acount for heat, and overall less raw materials. I wouldn't be suprised to see prices below 300.

hixbot 05/29/2009 3:21 PM
Hide
-0+

It's about time for a new PSP. Seriously how old is that dinosaur?

Anonymous 05/29/2009 4:10 PM
Hide
--1+

@ Tindytim

Do you even know what you're talking about? At first they had hardware emulation built into the PS3 system.

To cut costs (supposedly $25 per unit) they removed the first piece: the emotion chip, aka, hardware emulation. It was because of this chip that PS3 had virtually 100% backwards compatibility. They then brought out software emulation, which through the various updates got better, but it is still NOT as compatible with all games, and still the games that are 'compatible' are susceptible to 'graphics abnormalities' Take for example a game I love, 'Tales of Vesparia'. The emulated solution messes up the graphics in certain areas, making it difficult to play.

The second, third, fourth, and fifth pieces were all removed at once: The software emulation entirely, the card readers, support for Super Audio cds (of which my father has quite a collection), and the USB ports were reduced from 4 to 2 all in an effort to reduce costs.

My point is they keep removing features of the unit... who else does that? No one. Who wants a reduced unit for the just about the same price the previous ones sold for? Not me.

4c1dr41n4 05/29/2009 5:32 PM
Hide
-0+

For those of you who are not keeping up with the rumors:

PSP = PSP - UMD Drive + Built-in MS

You will HAVE to buy all your games through the PSN.

In case you don't know, you already CAN buy games through the PSN for your regular PSP, but many games are only available in UMDs. The PSP Go will force publishers to make them available through the PSN.

This is interesting for Sony. Sales through PSN should yield a much greater margin for them. This channel also seems to be less vulnerable to piracy. It's also a stab on the used games market.

This can also be interesting for consumers. The PSP Go should be cheaper (No UMD Drive). Games can be cheaper (simpler distribution). The memory stick use less battery than the UMD (obviously).

Let's see what happens.

4c1dr41n4 05/29/2009 5:35 PM
Hide
-0+

I meant PSP Go = PSP - UMD Drive + Built-in MS.

Will we ever get that EDIT button? Please?

ProDigit80 05/29/2009 6:43 PM
Hide
-0+

I found the PSP or even the gameboy SP too thin for my hands.
The old gameboy was more natural on the hands.

Antilycus 05/29/2009 7:26 PM
Hide
-0+

This is OOOOLLLLDDD news and that PS3 picture has already been a fake. Don't expect the PS3 to redesign for at least another 2 years...

Eccentric909 05/29/2009 8:36 PM
Hide
-0+

tenor77 :
Sony, I'm glad you're ditching UMD but if you want me to buy a PSP, please let us use SD cards.



I use SD-mini cards in my PSP every day. The adaptor costs around $4.

Tindytim 05/30/2009 1:14 PM
Hide
-0+

andesddhbhbs :
@ TindytimDo you even know what you're talking about? At first they had hardware emulation built into the PS3 system.


Really? I was completely unaware of this [/sarcasm]

All the crap you brought up was irrelevant to my point, hell I mentioned the trade of off compatibility in my original post if you cared to read it.

The fact of the matter is, if you want perfect compatibility, get a PS2. I've been able to play PS2 games rendered at 1920x1200 with AA for quite a while now with PCSX2, why can't the BC PS3s do this?

Sponsored links