How Quick is “Quick Start”?

By Mary Branscombe, published on March 4, 2009
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: , , | Themes: Windows Tech Talk, Laptops and Notebooks

7. How Quick is “Quick Start”?

Quick Start systems can live up to their name. The startup times are impressive, and in the case of Asus notebooks and the Voodoo Envy, the software boots from a flash hard drive. This means the manufacturers have to build it into the system, and it does add a little bit to the cost of the system. HyperSpace uses a partition on the hard drive, which means you can put it on any PC, but using it with a traditional solid-state drive does slow it down compared to flash-based pre-boot environments.

 Put the OS in flash and it can start in a few seconds.

It takes the same amount of time to boot into each of the two HyperSpace versions–Hybrid and Dual–so starting HyperSpace on a netbook like the Lenovo S10 takes the same amount of time as it does on a VT-enabled laptop. However, resuming from HyperSpace is very fast and takes just a second or two. Phoenix is adding a “hot off” feature to keep the power drain low enough that you’ll be able to keep using a netbook at intervals over a full-day period.

The Lenovo T400 Windows boot time wasn’t measured on a perfectly empty system, but the computer only had three items in the startup folder. If we tried these pre-boot tests on an older and slower machine with more startup apps and services, it would take longer to get to the point where you could start actually doing something in the pre-boot environment. When you look at the charts on the next page, keep in mind that the speed of the Asus S101 is due to a combination of running Windows 7 and using a super-fast solid-state drive.

Comments | Print | Send to a friend

Sponsored links

Comments

dlvonde 03/04/2009 8:41 PM
Hide
-0+

I could see this being very useful for one or 2 things..like a special purpose media player that will play all movie/audio formats and allow more of the hardware power to go to the actual content instead of supporting a bloated OS.

Many years ago I wondered if it would be possible to have an "OS Chip" that was exponentially faster than a stardard hard drive for storing your OS on...it looks like we're getting there!

A Stoner 03/04/2009 11:23 PM
Hide
--1+

At the very least it will push Microsoft harder to improve boot times. I think microsoft is working hard to improve boot times, but harder works for me. Really it will all be moot once they perfect one of the super fast static memory technologies, as then the whole system can go from off to on almost instantly... measure in 10s of ms.

fuser 03/05/2009 12:55 PM
Hide
-0+

I think these options will be less attractive once SSDs go mainstream. Intel SSDs boot Vista in < 10 seconds. Windows 7 should be even quicker.

captaincharisma 03/05/2009 5:30 PM
Hide
-0+

Quote :Many years ago I wondered if it would be possible to have an "OS Chip" that was exponentially faster than a stardard hard drive for storing your OS on...it looks like we're getting there!


this is what i am wondering too. right now these SSD's are just too small and the speeds are still trivial. i see if SSD don't make it then the motherboard makers will in the future just put and expansion port on there motherboards for a flashchip just for the OS

Anonymous 03/06/2009 1:53 AM
Hide
-1+

One important thing you seem to have forgotten: Windows XP, a full-sized OS that can boot in ~20 seconds (from bootloader screen to login screen, at least on my Athlon 64 X2 system with old Barracuda 7200.7). Newer hardware should improve it and possibly break 10 sec barrier.

Shame that XP wasn't included in this Speed Table...

Conclusion: you don't need to choose between beefy Vista or crippled quickstart os'es. Just use XP (or some light Linux distro).

Anonymous 03/06/2009 4:25 AM
Hide
-0+

WTF?

Have you ever used a Mac? Open it up and it wakes up from sleep immediately! None of this boot sillyness. This has been how Mac OS X has been working since 2001. Why keep eating the MS dog food when you can eat subway???

Anonymous 03/06/2009 6:53 AM
Hide
-0+

@fuser: see the boot speed table for how fast Windows 7 can boot on a fast SSD like the one in the S101; even the team at Phoenix were impressed by it.

@Anonymous: a Windows system wakes from sleep just as quickly and has done for many years. However many people choose to hibernate or shut down to save power. The first time I shut the lid on a Mac and left it unplugged for a few days and expected it to still have power when I came back to it, I was infuriated that it had stayed in sleep and run down the battery. You're comparing apples and oranges (and I wouldn't personally call Subway a premium brand either!)

Mary Branscombe

doug-jensen 03/07/2009 2:06 AM
Hide
--1+

Why not have the option to boot into Windows Mobile: that takes only a few seconds, and there are lots of apps (like MS Office compatible word processor) that open in another second or two; and the interface to WM is familiar to many PDA/smartphone users. The discontinued NEC MobilePro 900 and Psion Netbook Pro boot instantly, and Open Office's word processor or MS Word reader open instantly.

Anonymous 04/30/2009 12:14 PM
Hide
-0+

Does anyone know where to download Quicklook2

Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links