Application Benchmarks
- 1. Mobile Athlon XP And KT266A: A Superior Combination?
- 2. Vaio NVR-23: From All Sides
- 3. Vaio NVR-23: From All Sides, Continued
- 4. PowerNow = Always As Much Power As Necessary + Power Consumption As Low As Possible
- 5. Windows XP: The Relationship Between Power Scheme And PowerNow
- 6. Nvidia's PowerMizer: PowerNow For The GPU
- 7. Test Setup: Sony NVR-23
- 8. Benchmarks Under Windows XP
- 9. Synthetic Benchmarks
- 10. Multimedia Performance: PC Mark 2002
- 11. Application Benchmarks
- 12. 3D Performance: The Latest Drivers From The Manufacturer? Hardly!
- 13. Direct-3D Performance: 3D Mark2001 SE
- 14. Influence Of PowerMizer On 3D Performance
- 15. Open-GL Game Performance At Different PowerMizer Settings
- 16. Influence Of PowerMizer On The Battery Life
11. Application Benchmarks
Raytracing: POV-Ray For Windows
For this benchmark we perform rendering with Raytracer Pov-Ray: we use the scene chess2 with a resolution of 640 x 480 pixels and an anti-aliasing value of 0.3. There is no difference between the machines here. The performance difference under the "maximum battery" power scheme is caused by the different CPU speed (PCG-NVR23: 400MHz; Evo N1015v: 533MHz).

A P4 m running at 2.2 GHz needs ten seconds longer to complete this task under AC power, and Intel's current flagship model, the 1.6 GHz Pentium-M (Banias) is just twenty seconds faster, though it is considerably more expensive than a mobile Athlon XP.
MP3 Encoding: Lame
There are no discernible differences between the machines.

The figures in "maximum battery" mode show how important a high CPU speed is in this discipline. Although the mobile Athlon XP 1800+ is running just over 133MHz faster, this impacts the encoding time tremendously.
Intel's flagship, the 1.6 GHz Pentium-M , carries out this task approximately half a minute faster.
- Previous page Multimedia Performance: PC Mark 2002
- Next page 3D Performance: The Latest Drivers...




