Multimedia Performance: PC Mark 2002
Contents
- 1. Mobile Athlon XP And KT266A: A Superior Combination?
- 2. Vaio NVR-23: From All Sides
- 3. Vaio NVR-23: From All Sides, Continued
- 4. PowerNow = Always As Much Power As Necessary + Power Consumption As Low As Possible
- 5. Windows XP: The Relationship Between Power Scheme And PowerNow
- 6. Nvidia's PowerMizer: PowerNow For The GPU
- 7. Test Setup: Sony NVR-23
- 8. Benchmarks Under Windows XP
- 9. Synthetic Benchmarks
- 10. Multimedia Performance: PC Mark 2002
- 11. Application Benchmarks
- 12. 3D Performance: The Latest Drivers From The Manufacturer? Hardly!
- 13. Direct-3D Performance: 3D Mark2001 SE
- 14. Influence Of PowerMizer On 3D Performance
- 15. Open-GL Game Performance At Different PowerMizer Settings
- 16. Influence Of PowerMizer On The Battery Life
10. Multimedia Performance: PC Mark 2002
In this benchmark the Sony notebook edges ahead, except when the "maximum battery" setting is used. Memory and hard disk throughput is higher than that of the Evo N1015v.
Sysmark 2002: System Performance
The Sysmark 2002 application benchmark relates to overall system performance.
With a faster memory interface, a more powerful graphics solution, and a slightly faster hard disk, the PCG-NVR23 leaves the Evo N1015v behind in terms of performance. In the "maximum battery" setting, the slower CPU speed causes the memory performance to drop, which gives the Compaq the advantage. Nevertheless, the performance figures achieved - even under these conditions - are such that office applications will run with a good deal of speed.
- Previous page Synthetic Benchmarks
- Next page Application Benchmarks
