DTV Changeover Begins; Initial Reports Good

By Gavin Steacy, published on February 19, 2009 at 1:00 PM
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: , , | Themes: Digital Entertainment
Syndication: Add to your Google homepage Add to My Yahoo!

It's been a long time coming but the switch to digital television broadcasts is finally getting underway on a large scale. What is amazing is that the number of people who called in with "problems" getting a signal is actually quite low, according to the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB).

Unsurprisingly, while the broadcast industry has spent more than a billion dollars on consumer education about the changeover, there are some people who have delayed purchase of a converter box for their television sets and on February 17 their analog broadcasts were cut. 12.4 million households were affected by the February 17 switch to digital broadcasts by 421 television stations. Of that 12.4 million, only 28 000 frustrated viewers called in during the 12 hours after the analog signals were turned off, or under 0.23%.

In a statement from the NAB:

“NAB’s initial survey of impacted markets found that stations received on average between 50-200 calls. Viewers primarily had questions about converter boxes and rescanning issues, and stations were able to resolve a vast majority of calls over the telephone.”

The constant moving of official transition dates has confused many viewers. Stations reported that most callers eventually accepted that they were to blame for not purchasing converter boxes sooner.

Manager Jeff Long of WHKY-TV in Hickory, N.C., said that although their switch to digital broadcasts went quite well, some viewers called in complaining that they thought the switch would occur on June 12, which is the current official changeover date after the House of Representatives approved further delays earlier this month. This delay occurred largely because the converter box coupon fund had reached its limit, and in order for more coupons to be given out, old ones had to expire first. 

In the majority of heavily populated areas, at least one station will continue to broadcast analog television signals until June, or will simply broadcast important local news and information about the switch to digital television. Many stations have accepted to wait until the official changeover date of June 12 anyway.

Additionally, a number of stations that already broadcast digital TV are moving to different frequencies. Those who didn't wait for their sets to go blank and bought converter boxes or TVs with built-in digital tuners had to rescan for the new frequencies in order to continue viewing channels that they were able to access previously.

Comments | Print | Send to a friend
Content also available in : DTV Changeover Begins; Initial Reports Good
Slideshows related to this news

Sponsored links

Comments

EnFoRceR22 02/20/2009 10:56 AM
Hide
--1+

Odd i jsut did a scan on my DTV i picked up like 6 analog signals and 0 digital...........

Parrdacc 02/20/2009 4:26 PM
Hide
-0+

Well, it seems to me that the stations themselves can start now or they can wait till the June date. So if you have not picked up any digital channels yet, my guess would be that the stations that broadcast where you are, are probably waiting till June. Not a bad thing really, just means they have more time to make sure everything will go smoothly, and if not well they kinda don't have an excuse.

ProDigit80 02/20/2009 9:56 PM
Hide
-0+

I still have 6 analog signals as well!
Problem with the digital channels is you need at least 65% of signal channel to be able to see a show; while with the analog signals you can still make out the main characters of a movie and hear sound with 35% of signal; though be it through snow and noise.

also a lot of channels broadcast analog AND digital.
I often swap between the two, since 2x 3foot antenna is not enough to get sufficient TV signal in Hialeah.

randomizer 02/21/2009 12:37 PM
Hide
--2+

I agree. While digital is generally better if you have a good signal, with poor signals analog is better because you get less sporadic artifacts, freezes and dropped sounds. If you haven't got a signal booster installed in your house, it's a good idea. I went from having

randomizer 02/21/2009 12:38 PM
Hide
--2+

(Previous comment got partly nuked)...

randomizer 02/21/2009 12:40 PM
Hide
--2+

(Ok, I'll try a third time to get the rest of my comment posted :sarcastic: If it doesn't work, screw it) I went from having

randomizer 02/21/2009 12:42 PM
Hide
-2+

(Ok, I just worked out why, it thought I was doing HTML when I used the "less than" symbol. Now to try and hide all my other screwed comments...)

I agree. While digital is generally better if you have a good signal, with poor signals analog is better because you get less sporadic artifacts, freezes and dropped sounds. If you haven't got a signal booster installed in your house, it's a good idea. I went from having less than 20% signal quality to 70-80%. Make sure your splitter (if you have more than one antenna outlet) is in good condition too. Sometimes the ones that get installed originally are cheap and corrode over time.

Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links