Artist Creates Portraits With iPad Brushes App
Three hours of hard work compressed down to 7 minutes for your viewing pleasure.
On Youtube: a 7-minute time-lapse video showcases David Jon Kassan painting realistic portraits on his iPad, through the Brushes iOS app.
Kassan propped up his iPad on a canvas stand and, poking and sliding his fingers across Apple's tablet, created a digitized facsimile of his aged model. The whole process took three hours total, and a live stream was available on Kassan's website for an appreciative audience.
Like the etch-a-sketch and 1-bit painting, Kassan's proficiency with the iPad shows that it only takes time and some expertise to turn any platform into a creative tool. Yet as DVICE points out, iPad owners wouldn't have to spend hours creating art if the tablet came with its own camera.
Artist creates stunning portraits on his iPad (Brushes app available here)
- Lots of People Suing Apple for iPhone 4 Reception
- Robot Garbage Man Only Comes When Called
- Fix Your iPhone 4 Reception Woes for a Dollar
- Verizon Gives HTC Incredible Customers $25
- Another One Bites the Dust: T-Mobile Kills Sidekick
- MIT Develops Smartphone App to Test Your Eyes
- This is What's Wrong With iPhone 4's Reception
- PlayStation 3 is Finally Not a Money Loser for Sony
- $188 is How Much the iPhone 4 Hardware is Worth
- Desktop Earth: Real-Time Satellite Wallpapers
- Any Video Converter Coverts Videos in Bulk
- Shutdown Timer Provides Better Auto Shutdowns
- Mercedes-AMG Goes Green with Electric SLS
- App Store and iTunes Accounts Hacked
- Justin Bieber Targeted in YouTube Hack
- Virginia Tech Modding Ford SUV for Blind Drivers
- Man Fries iPhone With Giant Magnifying Glass
- Man With Hitler Speech as Ringtone Faces Jailtime
- Apple Wants Engineers for iPhone Antenna Design

Why why why do people think that just because something is done on an iPad/iPhone/iPod it is new or amazing? People have been doing portraits with similar software on PCs for years.
I think it's more news worthy to know that people can achieve just as much without using an iPad. Kassan has his iPad, da Vinci had his toile and I had my Lightbright.
why does it piss you off so bad is the question
he made a portrait by pretty much finger painting. i dont know of anyone who does that on PC
why does it piss you off so bad is the questionhe made a portrait by pretty much finger painting. i dont know of anyone who does that on PC
It annoys me because people have turned into mindless idiots. I see headlines such as "Doctor uses iPad in surgery", how is that special? What about everyone else who uses a PC?
And people have been making them by "finger painting" for a long time. Have you never seen touch tablets?
As much as I think the iPad is almost worthless compared to smartphones, I do see the relevance behind articles behind this. This is another way of making art without media. Just keep your panties on people, you don't have to read this, and the trolling just makes it a bit less enjoyable for those of us that do.
As much as I think the iPad is almost worthless compared to smartphones, I do see the relevance behind articles behind this. This is another way of making art without media. Just keep your panties on people, you don't have to read this, and the trolling just makes it a bit less enjoyable for those of us that do.
But please tell me what is special/new about it?
In the end, Mr. Kassan has proved himself to be a fantastic artist. This says absolutely nothing about what the average person can get out of this app on an iPad/iPhone/etc...
the ipad is good for one think that is for sure.
coming up with bs stories on slow news days. apple already has monopolized music. 2010 will go down in history as the year apple monopolized the news. all the while there are way better apps on the pc like EJukebox that go unmentioned.
the ipad is the stupidest, most useless device in the history of the planet. and please dont tell me you disagree with me. in fact, go ahead and disagree with me. i dont care. this is just my opinion.
Yeah I am not sure what the point of this article is. As an artist and as a consumer who does a lot of research before making a purchase, I decided against an ipad as a mobile digital art pad because it is severely limited in comparison to other devices. I went with a 12" tablet pc with much better accuracy, better digital painting software options, and most importantly: pressure sensitivity. The artist in this article is significantly more impressive than the device he's using but the title seems to focus on the ipad and application.
I don't see the point in this article either.
The iPad did something that has been around for a while, yet it's "new" and "revolutionary".
Next we'll see "Pilot uses iPad to fly plan"
And another crisis averted by using apple products! Thank god we have apple, i don't know where we'd be without them!
Impressive!
I'll take Etch-a-Sketch over iFemineProduct ANYDAY....
Not to knock Apple here, but my Wacom tablet (pressure sensitive) does a better job at half the cost of the ipad.
Drawing/painting with fingers doesn't even compete with a stylus.
Rico how much free apple product do they give Tom's hardware employees? I'm guessing a lot.
People can do that on a Wacom too, and a Wacom does not even have a screen.
It wouldn't have been necessary if the ipad came with a camera...
It annoys me because people have turned into mindless idiots. I see headlines such as "Doctor uses iPad in surgery", how is that special? What about everyone else who uses a PC?And people have been making them by "finger painting" for a long time. Have you never seen touch tablets?
Because they did it with a handicap.
Hebe, what is special about it is that on a cheap, light, portable device an artist has found a way to make some pretty impressive art with just his fingers and a $10 program. Being able to create this kind of art in such a way at this pricepoint is pretty new. Tsnorquist, your Wacom doesn't do it at half the cost of an iPad because you need a PC or a Mac to be able to use it with, that pushes the price to (easily) double that of an iPad, and is nowhere near as portable. icepick314, grow up and get over the name, and show me your etch-a-sketch art that is better than this.
_cubase_, how can you do that on a wacom without using a screen? The cintiq is available but is over three times the cost of the iPad. Didymus03, it sounds like you have a nice setup with your tablet PC, but how much did it cost? I can't find one for less that twice the cost of an iPad.
Everyone seems so jaded, this is pretty amazing, you didn't see anything like this without a stylus and a lot more cost until just this year.
The ipad doesn't do everything, but it is actually pretty amazing. I'm waiting for a version with a higher DPI screen and a camera so my kids can videocall with their grandmother and their cousins.
But at the price-point, size, weight and battery life, and being virus and malware free, I haven't seen anything that really competes yet.
Full tablet PCs are great if you want all of what they do, but for many applications that extra functionality is actually a detriment, it gets in the way and bogs things down. The iPad is great for a lot of people, and it doesn't make people who buy it stupid or uninformed or fanboys. It just means it suits their needs better than any other device at the moment. It may not suit yours, so don't buy one, but to hate one or the company that make it is pointless.
if ipad could help masturbation, it would be new.... all these things are done ages ago.
damn, should have sticked an apple logo on my touchscreen laptop....then the images i made in boring german classes would have been called Revolutionary and Magical Pieces of Art.
@nikonman24
iPads are what - $600 to $800 price range? HP consumer tablet PCs are $900+, and even the $900 model has a touch screen.
I cracked my $900 TX2120US screen and the HP web site listed a replacement part that turned out to be only the LCD. I tried to put the digitizer behind the new LCD, but it didn't go to the edges and was permanently off by 1/4". *sigh*
My solution? I went to amazon and spent $250 on an old (2004) toshiba M200. This particular model was a lowly 1.5 GHz cpu, 1400x1050 resolution non-touch screen, 1 GB ram, and XP tablet edition. I have Painter 11, but you can get a free version of Artrage (though there is a $20, $40, and $80 version if I recall correctly - and it presents a very natural way of drawing, at least to most traditional artists).
Yes, its heavier and has less battery life than the iPad. However, using an iPad for digital art is like using an original Asus EEE PC for writing software... you can do it if you really want to, but it is definitely the wrong tool for the job!
So, my point is this - if you want to get into digital art, all you need is a free program and a used $250-$500 tablet pc... and then use the extra money to get something like a Tekkeon universal battery. Its not as light as an iPad, but its much lighter than carrying around a full stock of art supplies (sketchbook, chalks, pastels, paints, charcoal, conte, canvas, watercolors, and so forth).
My other point is this - I said everyone would criticize the iPad until it was released, and then everyone would gobble it up and sensationalize it. To us who have used tablet PCs in the past, we see the device for what it is... the "netbook" of the tablet pc world. How many people are called stupid for trying to use a netbook where a tablet should be used? Well, that's what a digital artist would say about a person using an iPad over a tablet PC (even an old used one).
People did this on the ipod touch and iphone too... i don't find it news worthy though. =)
This just in: noone gives a shit about the iPad, so fuck it!
I could link you to youtube showing videos that showed far more creativity than the crap above.
Why why why do people think that just because something is done on an iPad/iPhone/iPod it is new or amazing? People have been doing portraits with similar software on PCs for years.
Because it has a bitten Apple on the back.