Apple Yet to Crack Top Five, Nokia Already Cutting Prices
The cell phone industry has been turned on its side since the release of Apple’s original iPhone more than a year ago, with the worldwide release of the 3G version amplifying the effect even further.
Despite its relatively huge success in sales of its iPhone and iPhone 3G, Apple has not done quite enough yet to garner a position in the top five mobile phone vendors globally. This is one of the major unwritten takeaways from a new report by research firm IDC.
The iPhone, in part though, may have contributed to an overall increase of global phone sales. IDC believes “advanced features in high-end phones” helped drive just slightly over 15 percent in sales growth between the second quarter of this year and the same time last year. Overall numbers show an increase from 265.4 million phones to 306 million.
The niche phone category of smartphones, which includes the iPhone, saw year-over-year growth rates of 40 percent, compared to roughly 10 percent of the rest of the industry.
The top five global mobile phone vendors, meanwhile, are Nokia, Samsung, Motorola, LG Electronics and Sony Ericsson. It is interesting to note that while Nokia leads the pack with nearly 40 percent market share in the most recent quarter.
Even with the commanding lead in market share, Nokia is keeping a keen eye on its rear view mirror. It was revealed that the Finnish cell phone maker is cutting the prices of its handsets by up to 10 percent, with the 5310, 5610 and N81 8GB getting the largest drops. The price cuts come at a time when profits are already thin.
“This is basically a way to run away from competition. You’re putting a lot of pressure on your less competitive peers,” said David Hallden, analyst at Cheuvreux, in a Reuters story.
As the market leader, Nokia stands to have the most to lose. Times are tough for some and better for others in the mobile sector. Motorola and Sony Ericsson reporting downward trends, while the Korean firms Samsung and LG Electronics are picking up with improved carrier agreements, no doubt helped by the weaker Korean won.
“Nokia has always been extremely tactical with its pricing, pinpointing sweet spots in different segments of the market and making adjustments to wrongfoot competitors,” said Ben Wood, research director at CCS Insight, in the report.
Although Apple has yet to crack the top five, Nokia is surely cutting prices in hopes of maintaining its spot at the top.
- iPhone 2.1 Firmware Update Looms, Delivers Missing Features?
- Portugal Signs Deal for 500,000 Low-Cost Laptops From Intel
- Wordscraper: The Scrabulous Knock-off
- LCD TV And Monitor Makers Trimming Shipment Targets, Says CPT
- Asustek Expects To Ship Up To 200,000 Eee Boxes Worldwide In 2008
- Asustek Preps Launch Of Ultimate And Pro Fashion Eee PCs, Prices To Hit $700 Or More
- Double-digit Growth For SOI Market Through 2012, Says VLSI Research
- LG's New Blu-ray Player Gets Netflixed
- Colossal Carbon Nanotubes Could Replace Cotton Fibers For High-tech Clothing
- Sun Previews JavaFX
- iPod Rumor Mill: 64 GB IPod Touch On The Way?
- Yahoo Relents, Gives Coupons, Refunds To Music DRM Captives
- Adobe Adds New Features To Photoshop Express
- Researchers Confirm Water On Mars
- Scientist Find Key To Lock Up Solar Power
- Cuil Beats Google ... In One Key Metric
- Google Announces Acquisition of Omnisio
- DHS Policies Allow Border Officials to Seize Your Laptop
- FCC Orders Comcast Allow Bittorrent Traffic
The article is kind of a fluff piece in general. The kind of thing where I wouldn't usually bother reading more than the first paragraph.
However, I choose to read the entire article so I could comment and no one could fault me for not reading the whole thing.
The phrase "relatively huge success" bugs me.
Huge means extraordinary..., exceedingly..., mammoth..., unusually great....
Relatively means by comparison to....
To justify the use of "relatively" we need to compare the iPhone's success to something so we can call it huge, but I can't think of anything. I would qualify the iPhone's success as "good" or "better than typical/expected".
If the author was thinking of something in particular to compare it to then it would have been good writing style to mention it in the article, as your typical reader probably doesn't have a ready reference.(example: "compared to other smart phones")
My interpretation:
To me, it seems likely that the author was using the phrase to generate hype or a sense of urgency for his writing(an effort that feel flat on its face).
Less likely but even worse, the author was attempting to pad an already fluffy article.
Either case is disappointing at best.
TG, I expect better.
BGP_Spook- r u unemployed or something!
You could say that I am unemployed.
My point is TG sells itself as a technical/professional website and that phrase, doesn't fit very well or stand by itself. It needs something to support it.
Its great that the over 15 percent in sales growth between the second quarter of this year and the same time last year.Its great to have this.
synjones
Crack Cocaine